Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Discussion (A) Deconstruction, criminalisation and the criminal law: a reply to Pavlich’s ‘The Lore of Criminal Accusation’

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Criminal Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendt, H. (1991). On revolution. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2002). Violence the age of uncertainty. In A. Crawford (Ed.), Crime and insecurity. The governance of safety in Europe. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (1992). The ethics of deconstruction. Derrida & Levinas. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1990). ‘Force de Loi: Le ‘Fondement Mystique de l’Autorité’, Cardozo Law Review, 11(5–6), 920–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1972). Marges de la Philosophie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1987). Psychè: Inventions de l’Autre. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. (1998). Law, language and community: some preconditions of criminal liability. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2003). Victims and offenders. In A. Von Hirsch, J. Roberts, & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice. Competing or reconcilable paradigms? Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N. (2005). Criminalisation as regulation. In Chr. Parker, C. Scott, & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Regulating law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this contribution was first presented on the occasion of the symposium on ‘Criminal Law and Philosophy’, October 2005, London. The author wishes to thank George Pavlich and Ronnie Lippens for comments given on an earlier version of this contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Katholieke Unversiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Erik Claes

Authors
  1. Erik Claes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Claes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Claes, E. Discussion (A) Deconstruction, criminalisation and the criminal law: a reply to Pavlich’s ‘The Lore of Criminal Accusation’. Criminal Law, Philosophy 1, 99–105 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9012-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9012-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation