Abstract
This paper examines the role of the physician in a pluralistic community. A personal and communal sense of identity must resolve a vast array of often conflicting backgrounds and contexts in order to function smoothly. Physicians are neither entitled to impose their own moral views on their patients nor expected to surrender their own moral agency. Several illustrative cases are given. The solution of inevitable conflicts is embodied within the context of the situation, but since irreconcilable differences remain, a resolution is not always possible. Tolerance for such differences and ways of dealing with them allows the integrity of both parties to remain intact.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Engelhardt H.T. Bioethics in Pluralist Society.Persp. in Bio. & Med. 26, 1982 64–78.
Kant IFoundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Bobbs-Merrill, 1980.
Macklin R. Consent, Coercion & Conflicts of Rights,Persp. in Bio. J Med., 20 1977, 360–371.
Kass L.R. Regarding the End of Medicine and the Pursuit of Health.Public Interest, 40 1975, 11–45.
Kass L.R. Ethical Dilemmas in the Care of the Ill: II. What is the Patient's Good?JAMA, 244(17), 1980, 1946–1949.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loewy, E.H. Physicians and patients: Moral agency in a pluralistic world. J Med Hum 7, 57–68 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115177
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115177