Historical Narrative: A Dispute Between Constructionism and Scientific Realism
An intense discussion about the issue of historical narrative arose during the time when the naïve realism of classical historiography was being critiqued and led to a dispute, in the last century, between constructionism and critical or scientific realism. We can distinguish between constructionism and noetic constructivism. According to ontological constructionism all facts are human constructions; according to noetic constructivism, our notions and theories are constructs with objective meaning (sense and reference); they refer to objective reality. Scientific realism recognizes the existence of noetic construction but does not regard facts as our constructions, as pure fictions. The point of contention is the question over whether historical narrative is merely a discursive construction or whether it is also a scientific reconstruction of the past. Resolving the dispute over whether historical narrative can be objectively true, or whether it is subject to empirical control or not, is dependent on finding the answer to this question.
References
Ankersmit, F.R. Six Theses on Narrativist Philosophy of History. In History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. Berkeley: University of California Press, 333-343, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Appleby, J., Hunt, L., Jacob, M. Jak říkat pravdu o dějinách. Brno: Centrum poro studium demokracie a kultury, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Cleleand, C.E. Methodological and Epistemic Diferences between Historical Science and Experimental Science. Philosophy of Science 69, 474-496, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. The Idea of History. Oxford Univ. Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
Croce, B. History as the Story of Liberty. London: George Allen and Unwin Limited, 1941.Search in Google Scholar
Černík, V., Viceník, J. Formovanie teórie spoločenského faktu. Filozofia 63, no. 8, 670-682, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Černík, V., Viceník, J. (Ed.). Zákon, explanácia a interpretácia v spoločenských vedách. Bratislava: Iris, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Danto, A.C. Analytical Philosophy of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Search in Google Scholar
Domanska, E. Wokol metahistorii. In M. Stanford. An Introduction to the Philosophy of History. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, U. Meno ruže. Bratislava: Sme, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Fergusson, N. et al. Virtuální dejiny. Historické alternativy. Praha: Nakladatelství Dokořán, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
Gulyga, A.V. O povaze historického poznání. In Teoretické problémy historie. Praha, 1972.Search in Google Scholar
Hawking, S. The Universe in a Nutshell. New York: A Bantam Book, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
Kleinhaus, M.G., Bushes, Ch. J. J., de Regt, H.W. Terra Incognita: Explanation and Reduction in Earth Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19, No.3, 289-317, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Magagnini, A. Etruskové. Poklady starobylých civilizací. Praha: Universum, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, K. Kapitál. Bratislava: Pravda, 1985.Search in Google Scholar
Passmore, J.A. The Objectivity of History. In W.H. Dray (Ed.). Philosophical Analysis and History. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.Search in Google Scholar
Pomorski, J. Historyk i Metodologia. Lublin: Wydawnictvo Marie Currie-Sklodowska, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Russel, B. History as an Art. London: Aldington, 1954.Search in Google Scholar
Stanford, M. An Introduction to the Philosophy of History. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Šuch, J. Frank Ankersmit: Narativní logika a historická reprezentácia. Historický časopis 57, No. 1, 3-18, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Topolski, J. Marksizm i historia. Warszawa: PWN, 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Topolski, J. Metodologia historie. Warszawa: PWN, 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Topolski, J. Wprowadzeni do histoprie. Poznan: Wydawnictvo Poznanskie, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Toynbee, A.J. Studium dějin. Úvod. Praha: Práh, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Vico, G. Základy nové vědy o společenské přirozenosti národú. Praha: Academia, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
White, H. Poetika pisarstva historicznego. (E. Domanska, M. Wilczynski). Krakow: Univerista, 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Zeleňák, E. Virtuální dějiny. Historické alternativy. Praha: Nakladatelství Dokořán, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
© 2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
This content is open access.
