Abstract
Directing attention to features in the here and now (via individual or joint ventures) is the single, most basic purpose for Dicisigns in human ontogeny. To effectively individuate in the stream of relational awareness, attentional devices must maximize notice of the dynamicity of primary graphical displays. This is a complex process, in that it requires codification of several interconnected but individualized spatial systems and event correlates: associating objects with locations, utilizing other objects as reference points, using intrinsic sidedness and absolute points of reference to orient, and anticipating potential alterations of participants within the spatial array. Early awareness of shifting object location relies upon a double sign (index, icon) to identify and implement landmarks for precise object location. Afterward, establishing other persons/objects as referent points becomes critical. Determining orientation and motility ultimately requires individuating-shape representamen which can leverage spatial inferencing –defining participant action schemes via event profiles. In other words, expectations of action paths which attentional signs afford drives well-formed abductions of participants’ likely momentary orientational shifts. Nonetheless, to successfully predict these shifts, Dicisigns must supersede affiliation with single energetic interpretants; they need to incorporate logical interpretants realized in agent-receiver role reciprocation.
References
Acredolo, Linda. 1988. From signal to “symbol”: The development of landmark knowledge from 9 to 13 months. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 6. 369–393.10.1111/j.2044-835X.1988.tb01110.xSearch in Google Scholar
Atkin, Albert. 2005. Peirce on the index and indexical reference. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41(1). 161–168.Search in Google Scholar
Bellucci, Francesco. 2014. “Logic, considered as semeiotic”: On Peirce’s philosophy of logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50(4). 523–547.10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.50.4.523Search in Google Scholar
Bergman, Mats. 2016. Habit-change as ultimate interpretant. In Donna E West & Myrdene Anderson (eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit: Before and beyond consciousness, 171–197. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2_11Search in Google Scholar
Bremner, J. Gavin & Peter Bryant. 1977. Place versus response as the basis of spatial errors made by young infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 23. 162–171.10.1016/0022-0965(77)90082-0Search in Google Scholar
Kilpinen, Erkki. 2016. In what sense exactly is Peirce’s habit-concept revolutionary? In Donna E. West & Myrdene Anderson (eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit: Before and beyond consciousness, 199–213. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2_12Search in Google Scholar
Leslie, Alan, Fei Xu, Patrice Tremoulet & Brian Scholl. 1998. Indexing and the object concept: Developing “what” and “where” systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2. 10–18.10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01113-3Search in Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean. 2010. The spatial foundations of the conceptual system. Language and Cognition 2(1). 21–44.10.1515/langcog.2010.002Search in Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean. 2012. On the spatial foundations of the conceptual system and its enrichment. Cognitive Science 36(3). 421–451.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01241.xSearch in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.), The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 8. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1998. In Peirce Edition Project (eds.), Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Vol. 2, 1893–1913. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.].Search in Google Scholar
Quinn, Paul C. 1994. The categorization of above and below spatial relations by young infants. Child Development 65. 58–69.10.2307/1131365Search in Google Scholar
Saylor, Megan M. 2004. Twelve- and 16-month-old infants recognize properties of mentioned absent things. Developmental Science 7(5). 599–611.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00383.xSearch in Google Scholar
Scaife, Michael & Jerome Bruner. 1975. The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature 253. 265–266.10.1038/253265a0Search in Google Scholar
Short, Thomas L. 1996. Interpreting Peirce’s interpretant: A response to Lalor, Liszka, and Meyers. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32(4). 488–541.Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of Dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2015. Dicisigns: Peirce’s semiotic doctrine of propositions. Synthese 2015. 1–36.10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5Search in Google Scholar
West, Donna E. 2011. Deixis as a symbolic phenomenon. Linguistik Online 50(6). 89–100.10.13092/lo.50.321Search in Google Scholar
West, Donna E. 2013a. Deictic imaginings: Semiosis at work and at play. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-39443-0Search in Google Scholar
West, Donna E. 2013b. Peircean index in the naming process: Nouns, pronouns, and proper names. Public Journal of Semiotics 5(2). 31–46.10.37693/pjos.2013.5.9755Search in Google Scholar
West, Donna E. 2015a. Course of action recommendations and their place in developmental abduction. IfCoLog Journal of Logic and its Applications 3(3), 123–150.Search in Google Scholar
West, Donna E. 2015b. Recommendations as imperative propositions in the operation of abductive reasoning: Peirce and beyond. In M. Bergman & J. Queiroz (eds.), The commens encyclopedia: The digital encyclopedia of Peirce studies, 150526–0100a. http://www.commens.org/encyclopedia/article/west-donna-recommendations-imperative-propositions-operation-abductive (accessed 11 August 2018).).Search in Google Scholar
West, Donna E. 2016a. Individuating in the dark: Diagrammatic reasoning and attentional shifts. Semiotica 210(1/4). 35–56.10.1515/sem-2016-0057Search in Google Scholar
West, Donna E. 2016b. Indexical scaffolds to habit-formation. In Donna E West & Myrdene Anderson (eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit: Before and beyond consciousness, 215–240. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2_13Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
