Abstract
In this introductory chapter, we discuss some recent theoretical approaches to the relations between Western Philosophy and Literary Modernism, and at the same time, we get back to some classic contrasts drawn between the two creative enterprises in the foundational texts of each tradition, which make them seem irreconcilable. Recent rapprochements made by commentators on twentieth-century philosophy and the cultural breakthrough of Modernism in the last decade of the nineteenth-century have insisted on a disenchanted rupture with all kinds of metaphysical worldviews (now seen as myths), which had theretofore played a stabilizing role in human beings’ lives and in Western societies at large. Usually this demystifying gesture is associated with a concentration of theoretical attention on the role played by language itself. In terms of the development of philosophical methods in the twentieth-century, this has been especially associated with the so-called ‘linguistic analysis’. You could conceive of the linguistic turn as a new metaphysical framework. This framework would equally encompass the whole of reality in a single, unifying principle. In this book we mean to avoid this essentialist worldview by drawing on highly differentiated resources from human language itself, be it poetry, the novel, the theatre or the plastic arts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cavell, S. 2002. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eliot, T.S. 1975. Selected Prosed of T.S. Eliot, ed. and with an Introduction by Frank Kermode. New York: Harcourt.
Everett, B. 1986. Golding’s Pity. In William Golding: The Man and His Books, ed. J. Carey. London: Faber and Faber.
Fried, M. 1980. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. 2000. The Beginning of Philosophy. New York: Continuum.
Gaita, R. 1998. A Common Humanity: Thinking About Love and Truth and Justice. London: Routledge.
Levenson, M. (ed.). 1999. The Cambridge Companion to Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matar, A. 2006. Modernism and the Language of Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
Mulhall, S. 2009. The Wounded Animal. J.M. Coetzee and the Difficulty of Reality in Literature and Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Pataut, M. 2006. Review of ‘Anat Matar, Modernism and the Language of Philosophy, Routledge, 2006’. In Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Web. 31 July, 2017.
Pessoa, F. 2015. The Book of Disquiet, trans. and ed. Richard Zenith. London: Penguin Books.
Pippin, R. 1999. Modernism as a Philosophical Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Falcato, A., Cardiello, A. (2018). Introduction: Philosophy and Literary Modernism—An Old Problem Finally Made New. In: Falcato, A., Cardiello, A. (eds) Philosophy in the Condition of Modernism . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77078-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77078-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77077-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77078-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)