Skip to main content

Towards a Typology of Natural Logic

  • Chapter
Quantification in Natural Languages

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 54))

Abstract

In this paper1 I would like to explore the notion that the kind of logical structure appropriate to the description of a human language, rather than being uniform for all languages, might depend in a typologically significant way on the language being described. I will examine a selection of grammatical phenomena in certain North American languages with a view towards explicating what I believe to be coherent principles that inform the semantic interpretative components of their grammars. Underlying our exploration will be the question: what are the typologically significant aspects of semantic or logical interpretation?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aissen, J. (1989) Agreement Controllers and Tzotzil Comitatives, Language 65, 518–536. Barwise, J. and Cooper, R. (1981) Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. and Deloria, E. C. (1941) Dakota Grammar, National Academy of Sciences Memoirs, 23: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechel, E., S. J. (1939) A Grammar of Lakota, Rosebud Educational Society, Saint Francis, S.D.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeReuse, W. J. (1978) A Grammar of the Lakhota Noun Phrase, M.A. thesis, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, J. M. (1989) On the Structure of So-Called “Internally-headed” Relative Clauses, Proceedings of the Penn. Linguistics Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frishberg, N. (1972) Navajo Object Markers and the Great Chain of Being. In J. P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics I, Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goossen, I. W. (1967) Navajo Made Easier, Revised Edition, Northland, Flagstaff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairy Shirt, L., One Star, L., Sr., Douville, V., Stands, C., Sosnowski, S., and Brennan, T., S. J. (1973) Lakota Woonspe Wowapi, North Plains Press, Aberdeen, South Dakota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. (1983) Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 5–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1983) Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, E. (1984) Empty Categories, Case, and Configurationality, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 39–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, E. (1987) Headless Relatives and Pronominal Arguments: A Typological Perspective. In P. Kroeber and R. Moore (eds.), Native American Languages and Grammatical Typology. Papers from a CLS parassession, Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, E. (1988) Quantification Without Nouns in Salish, unpublished paper presented at the Symposium on Cross-Linguistic Quantification, LSA Winter Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, E. (1995) Quantification in Straits Salish. In E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 487–540.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. (1981) A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. In J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, and M. B. J. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L. and Faltz, L. M. (1985) Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W. (1988) Group Reference and the Plural Pronoun Construction, Papers on the Plural Pronoun Construction and Comitative Coordination, Syntax Research Center, UC Santa Cruz, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, C. (1984) Der Relativsatz, Gunter Narr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, L. (1988) Comitative Coordination in Russian, Papers on the Plural Pronoun Construction and Comitative Coordination, Syntax Research Center, UC Santa Cruz, pp. 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. (1974) Formal Philosophy,Yale University Press, New Haven. Navajo Language Institute (1986) Diné Bizaad Bôhoo’aah,Farmington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. (1979) Constraining Transformational Montague Grammar: A Framework and a Fragment. In S. Davis and M. Mithun (eds.), Linguistics, Philosophy, and Montague Grammar, University of Texas, pp. 51–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. (1984) Compositionality. In F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 281–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. (1987) Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platero, P. (1974) The Navajo Relative Clause, International Journal of American Linguistics 40, 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, E. T. (1978) The Role of Word Order and Scope in the Interpretation of Navajo Sentences, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rood, D. S. and Taylor, A. R. (1976) Beginning Lakhota, University of Colorado Lakhota Project, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, H.-J. (1988) Der irokesische Sprachtyp, Zeitschrift fir Sprachwissenschaft 7, 2, 173–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, L. (1988) Asymmetric Feature Distribution in Pronominal `Coordinations’. In M. Barlow and C. A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in Natural Language, CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1985) Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description 3, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. S. (1987) An Indefiniteness Restriction for Relative Clauses in Lakhota. In E. J. Reuland and A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 168–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willie, M. A. (1989) Why There is Nothing Missing in Navajo Relative Clauses. In

    Google Scholar 

  • E.-D. Cook and K. D. Rice (eds.), Athapaskan Linguistics,Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. Young, R. and Morgan, W. (1987) The Navajo Language,Revised Edition, UNM Press, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeevat, H. (1989) A Compositional Approach to Discourse Representation Theory, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 95–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Faltz, L.M. (1995). Towards a Typology of Natural Logic. In: Bach, E., Jelinek, E., Kratzer, A., Partee, B.H. (eds) Quantification in Natural Languages. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2817-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2817-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3129-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2817-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics