Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advances in multiattribute utility theory

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several advances in multiattribute expected utility theory have emerged recently. Much of the existing theory deals with independence axioms on whole attributes and the corresponding utility decompositions. This paper reviews three alternate approaches for obtaining representations of multiattribute utility functions: (1) multi-valent preference analysis, (2) approximation methods, and (3) indifference spanning analysis. Unlike some utility decompositions, these approaches require the assessment of only single-attribute functions which makes implementation relatively simple. Only multivalent preference analysis and indifference spanning analysis, however, provide axioms that can be empirically tested to justify a particular utility representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, David E., ‘Interpolation Independence’, in S. Zionts (ed.), Multiple Criteria Problem Solving, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 155, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1–7, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, David E., ‘Consistent Assessment Procedures Using Conditional Utility Functions’, Operations Research 27 (1979a), 1054–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, David E., ‘Multiattribute Utility Functions: Decompositions Using Interpolation’, Management Science 25 (1979b), 744–753.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farquhar, Peter H., ‘Fractional Hypercube Decompositions of Multiattribute Utility Functions’, Technical Report 222, Department of Operations Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farquhar, Peter H., ‘A Fractional Hypercube Decomposition Theorem for Multi-attribute Utility Functions’, Operations Research 23 (1975), 941–967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farquhar, Peter H., ‘Pyramid and Semicube Decompositions of Multiattribute Utility Functions’, Operations Research 24 (1976), 256–271.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farquhar, Peter H., ‘A Survey of Multiattribute Utility Theory and Applications’, in M. K. Starr and M. Zeleny (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, North-Holland/TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences 6 (1977), 59–89.

  8. Farquhar, Peter H., ‘Interdependent Criteria in Utility Analysis’, in S. Zionts (ed.), Multiple Criteria Problem Solving, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 155, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 131–180, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farquhar, Peter H., ‘Multivalent Preference Structures’, Mathematical Social Sciences 1 (1980).

  10. Farquhar, Peter H. and Fishburn, Peter C., ‘Equivalence and Continuity in Multivalent Preference Structures’, Operations Research 29 (1981).

  11. Farquhar, Peter H. and Rao, Vithala R., ‘A Balance Model for Evaluating Subsets of Multiattributed Items’, Management Science 22 (1976), 528–539.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fishburn, Peter C., ‘Independence in Utility Theory with Whole Product Sets’, Operations Research 13 (1965), 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fishburn, Peter C., Utility Theory for Decison Making, Wiley, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fishburn, Peter C., ‘Bernoullian Utilities for Multiple-Factor Situations’, in J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, 47–61, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fishburn, Peter C., ‘von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Functions on Two Attributes’, Operations Research 22 (1974), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fishburn, Peter C., ‘Approximations of Two-Attribute Utility Functions’, Mathematics of Operations Research 2 (1977), 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fishburn, Peter C., ‘Approximations of Multiattribute Utility Functions’, Journal of Approximation Theory 27 (1979), 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fishburn, Peter C. and Farquhar, Peter H., ‘Finite-Degree Utility Independence’, unpublished manuscript, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fishburn, Peter C. and Keeney, Ralph L., ‘Seven Independence Conditions and Continuous Multiattribute Utility Functions’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 11 (1974), 294–327.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fishburn, Peter C. and Keeney, Ralph L., ‘Generalized Utility Independence and Some Implications’, Operations Research 23 (1975), 928–940.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson, Edgar M. and Huber, George P., ‘The Technology of Utility Assessment’, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-7 (1977), 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Keeney, Ralph L., ‘Quasi-Separable Utility Functions’, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 15 (1968), 551–565.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Keeney, Ralph L., ‘Utility Independence and Preferences for Multiattributed Consequences’, Operations Research 19 (1971), 875–893.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keeney, Ralph L., ‘Utility Functions for Multiattributed Consequences’, Management Science 18 (1972), 276–287.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Keeney, Ralph L., ‘Multiplicative Utility Functions’, Operations Research 22 (1974), 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Keeney, Ralph L. and Raiffa, Howard, Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kirkwood, Craig W., ‘Parametrically Dependent Preferences for Multiattributed Consequences’, Operations Research 24 (1976), 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meyer, Richard F., ‘State-Dependent Time Preference’, in D. E. Bell, R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa (eds.), Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, Wiley, New York, 232–243, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nahas, Khaled H., ‘Preference Modeling of Utility Surfaces’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pollak, Robert A., ‘Additive von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Functions’, Econometrica 35 (1967), 485–494.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raiffa, Howard, ‘Preferences for Multiattributed Alternatives’, RM-5868-DOT/RC, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tamura, Hiroyuki and Nakamura, Yutaka, ‘Decompositions of Multiattribute Utility Functions Based on a New Concept of Convex Dependence’, Proceedings of International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society, Tokyo, 1978a.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tamura, Hiroyuki and Nakamura, Yutaka, ‘Convex Decomposition of a Two-Attribute Utility Function for Pollution and Consumption’, unpublished manuscript, Department of Precision Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan, 1978b.

    Google Scholar 

  34. von Neumann, John and Morgenstern, Oskar, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Davis, USA

    Peter H. Farquhar

Authors
  1. Peter H. Farquhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research under Contract No. N00014-78-C-0638, Task No. NR-277-258.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farquhar, P.H. Advances in multiattribute utility theory. Theor Decis 12, 381–394 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131317

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131317

Keywords

Search

Navigation