Abstract
There have been essentially two types of theoretical approaches to account for the grammatical relations associated with the causee argument of causative constructions. Ignoring the specifics of particular theories, there are transitivity based approaches in which the causee is a direct object when the embedded clause is intransitive, and an indirect object or oblique when the embedded clause is transitive. This pattern finds considerable cross-linguistic support. On the other hand, there are languages in which the causee exhibits alternative grammatical relations irrespective of transitivity: the causee direct object correlates with direct causation, while indirect object or oblique causees are associated with indirect causation. Such phenomena have motivated a semantic approach.
Focusing primarily on data from Spanish, we account for both sorts of phenomena by proposing a novel extension of Dowty's [(1991) Language 67, 547–619] proto-property proposal, thereby rendering it a comprehensive model of argument selection for both simple and complex predicates. According to Dowty's original Argument Selection Principle, the most proto-patientive argument in a single argument structure tends to be encoded as a direct object. In the case of causatives with intransitive base predicates, the most proto-patientive argument will be the causee. However, if the embedded clause is transitive, the causee will be less proto-patientive that the embedded patient, and will not be encoded as a direct object. Thus, the Argument Selection Principle, operating in a syntagmatic fashion over co-arguments, effectively derives the transitivity-determined causee encodings. In order to address the effects associated with the semantic approach, we develop paradigmatic interpretation of the Argument Selection Principle. That is, when the causee argument varies in degree of proto-patientivity, the most proto-patientive alternant is encoded as a direct object, and any decrease in proto-patientivity is reflected by relational encodings that are sequentially lower than direct object on the relational hierarchy. Thus, the transitivity and semantic effects of causee encoding are accounted for by the interaction of the syntagmatic and paradigmatic argument selection strategies. We propose that these two strategies represent organizing principles for argument selection information associated with lexical entries.
Finally, the interaction of these two selection strategies creates a tension in the encoding of causee arguments that is resolved in different ways in different languages. Hence, we suggest that some of the cross-linguistic variation with respect to causee encoding is due to the resolution of this conflict. Thus, we conclude by showing how these selection principles and lexical properties interact to derive a typology for well-attested patterns of variation in causee encoding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abeillé, A., D. Godard and P. Miller: 1994, ‘The Syntactic Structure of French Causative Constructions’, Paper presented at the Sixty Eighth Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston.
Ackerman, F.: 1994, ‘Entailments of Predicates and the Encoding of Causees’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 535–547.
Ackerman, F. and J. Moore: forthcoming, Proto-Properties and Grammatical Encodings: A Correspondence Theory of Argument Selection, CSLI Publications.
Ackerman, F. and G. Webelhuth: 1998, A Theory of Predicates, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA.
Aissen, J. L.: 1979, The Syntax of Causative Constructions, Garland, New York.
Aissen, J. L. and D. M. Perlmutter: 1976, ‘Clause Reduction in Spanish’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 2, 1–30. Revised in D. M. Perlmutter (ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar 1, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Alsina, A.: 1992, ‘On the Argument Structure of Causatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 517–56.
Alsina, A.: 1996, The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
Alsina, A. and S. Joshi: 1991, ‘Parameters in Causative Constructions’, Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–15, Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society.
Austin, P.: 1993, Causatives and Applicatives in Australian Languages, Ms, La Trobe University, Melbourne.
Authier, J.-M. and L. Reed: 1991, ‘Ergative Predicates and Dative Cliticization in French Causatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 197–205.
Baker, M.: 1988, Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Bell, S. J.: 1976, Cebuano Subjects in Two Frameworks, MIT dissertation, Cambridge, MA.
Cole, P.: 1976, ‘A Causative Construction in Modern Hebrew: Theoretical Implications’, in P. Cole (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics, pp. 99–126, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.
Cole, P.: 1983, ‘The Grammatical Role of the Causee in Universal Grammar’, International Journal of American Linguistics 49, 115–133.
Comrie, B.: 1976, ‘The Syntax of Causative Constructions: Cross-Language Similarities and Divergences’, in M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, pp. 261–312, Academic Press, New York.
Comrie, B.: 1981, Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Croft, W. A.: 1986, ‘Surface Subject Choice of Mental Verbs’, Paper presented at the Sixty First Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.
Davies, W. D.: 1981, Choctaw Clause Structure, dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Davies, W. D. and C. G. Rosen: 1988, ‘Unions as Multi-Predicate Clauses’, Language 64, 52–88.
Davis, A.: 1997, ‘Lexical Semantics and Linking and the Hierarchical Lexicon’, dissertation, Stanford University.
DeSimone, J.: 1997, ‘Alternations in Korean Causatives’, Papers from the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, The Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL.
Dorel, M. A.: 1980, ‘The Two Verbs faire in French Expressions of Causation’, in F. H. Nuessel Jr. (ed.), Contemporary Studies in Romance Languages, Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on Romance Languages, pp. 27–47, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
Dowty, D.: 1991, ‘Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection’, Language 67, 547–619.
Fillmore, C. J. and P. Kay: 1993, Construction Grammar, Ms, University of California, Berkeley.
Fillmore, C. J., P. Kay and M. C. O'Connor: 1988, ‘Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions’, Language 64, 501–538.
Finnemann, M. D.: 1982, Aspects of the Spanish Causative Construction, University of Minnesota dissertation, Minneapolis, MN.
Foley, W. A. and R. D. Van Valin Jr.: 1984, Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fontana, J. M.: 1991, ‘Catalan and Spanish Psych-Verbs and the Universal Alignment Hypothesis’, Paper presented at the Twenty First Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages.
García, E. C.: 1975, The Role of Theory in Linguistic Analysis: The Spanish Pronoun System, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.
Gerdts, D. B.: 1990, ‘Revaluation and Inheritance in Korean Causative Union’, in P. M. Postal and B. D. Joseph (eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar 3, pp. 203–246, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Gibson, J. D.: 1980, Clause Union in Chamorro and in Universal Grammar, University of California dissertation, San Diego, CA.
Gibson, J. D. and E. Raposo: 1986, ‘Clause Union, The Stratal Uniqueness Law and the Chômeur Relation’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 295–331.
Goldberg, A. E.: 1995, Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Hetzron, R.: 1976, ‘On the Hungarian Causative Verb and Its Syntax’, in M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, pp. 371–398, Academic Press, New York.
Holisky, D. A.: 1987, ‘The Case of the Intransitive Subject in Tsova-Tush (Batsbi)’, Lingua 71, 103–132.
Hyman, L. M. and K. E. Zimmer: 1976, ‘Embedded Topic in French’, in C. N. Li, Subject and Topic, pp. 189–211, Academic Press, New York.
Jackendoff, R.: 1991, Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Jackendoff, R.: 1996, ‘The Proper Treatment of Measuring Out, Telicity, and Perhaps Even Quantification in English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14, 305–354.
Kang, Y.-S.: 1984, ‘Two Types of Periphrastic Causative Constructions in Korean’, Linguistic Journal of Korea 9, 29–71.
Kayne, R. S.: 1975, French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kemmer, S. and A. Verhagen: 1994, ‘The Grammar of Causatives and the Conceptual Structure of Events’, Cognitive Linguistics 5, 115–156.
Kozinsky, I. and M. Polinsky: 1993, ‘Causee and Patient in the Causative of Transitive: Coding Conflict or Doubling of Grammatical Relations?’, in B. Comrie and M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity, pp. 177–224, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Kuroda, S.-Y.: 1965, ‘Causative Forms in Japanese’, Foundations of Language 1, 30–50.
Ladusaw, W. A. and D. R. Dowty: 1988, ‘Towards a Non-Grammatical Account of Thematic Roles’, in W. Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Roles, pp. 61–73, Academic Press, New York.
Langacker, R. W.: 1991, Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav: 1995, Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav: to appear, ‘From Lexical Semantics to Argument Realization’, in H. Borer (ed.), Handbook of Morphosyntax and Argument Structure, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Masica, C. P.: 1976, Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Marantz, A.: 1984, On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mohanan, T.: 1991, Causativization in Malayalam, ms., Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Moore, J.: 1989, ‘Spanish Restructuring and Psych Verbs: A Case for VP-complementation’, West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 8, 262–276.
Moore, J.: 1990, ‘Spanish Clause Reduction with Downstairs Cliticization’, in K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell and E. Mejías-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective, pp. 319–334, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
Park, J.-W.: 1994, Morphological Causatives in Korean: Problems in Grammatical Polysemy and Constructional Relations, University of California dissertation, Berkeley, CA.
Perlmutter, D. M. and P. M. Postal: 1974, ‘Lectures on Relational Grammar’, unpublished notes, Summer Linguistics Institute of the LSA, Amherst, MA.
Pesetsky, D.: 1995, Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Postal, P. M.: 1970, ‘On the Surface Verb ‘Remind’’, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 37–120.
Polinsky, M.: 1994, ‘Double Objects in Causatives: Towards a Study of Coding Conflict’, Studies in Language 19, 129–221.
Reed, L.: 1992, ‘On Clitic Case Alternations in French Causatives’, in P. Hirschbühler and K. Koerner (eds.), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory: Papers from the 20th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, pp. 205–224, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Reed, L.: 1993, Non-Truth-Conditional Aspects of Meaning and the Level of LF, dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
Roldán, M.: 1972, ‘In Defense of Raising’, Papers in Linguistics 5, 514–529.
Rosen, S. T.: 1990, Argument Structure and Complex Predicates, Garland, New York, NY.
Saksena, A.: 1982, Topics in the Analysis of Causatives with an Account of Hindi Paradigms, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Shibatani, M.: 1973, A Linguistic Study of Causative Constructions, dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Shibatani, M.: 1976, ‘A Grammar of Causative Constructions: A Conspectus’, in M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, pp. 1–40, Academic Press, New York.
Strozer, J. R.: 1976, Clitics in Spanish, University of California dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Syeed, S. M.: 1985, Morphological Causatives and the Problems of the Transformational Approach, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
Talmy, L.: 1988, ‘Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition’, Cognitive Science 12, 49–100.
Treviño, E.: 1990, Non-Canonical Subjects in Spanish: Evidence from Causative and Psych Verbs, ms., University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
Treviño, E.: 1992, ‘Subjects in Spanish Causative Constructions’, in P. Hirschbühler and K. Koerner (eds.), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory: Papers from the 20th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, pp. 309–324, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Van Valin, R. D. and D. P. Wilkins: 1996 ‘The Case for ‘Effector’: Case Roles, Agents, and Agency Revisited’, in M. Shibatani and S. A. Thompson, Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 289–322.
Volodin, A. P. et al.: 1969, ‘Kauzativy, antikauzativy i kauzativnye konstruktsii v finskom jazyke’, in A. A. Xolodovič (ed.), Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij, pp. 221–237, Nauka, Leningrad.
Zubizarreta, M. L.: 1985, ‘The Relation between Morphology and Morphosyntax: The Case of Romance Causatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 247–289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ackerman, F., Moore, J. Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Dimensions of Causee Encodings. Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 1–44 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005462027684
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005462027684