Abstract
With recent advancements in technology and computer science, we have reached a point where we can clearly state that thinking is no longer the exclusive privilege of living minds. Artificial intelligence (AI) can gather and process information in a manner fairly similar or even superior to our thinking process. AI can use this processed information in a reasoning process to make decisions and execute them. However, what makes our mind distinct from AI is the addition of “I,” that is, an entity composed of two mental processes of awareness-based choice selection (ABCS) and discretionary selection of information for attention (DSIA) that are the fundamental core function of decision making and awareness processes, respectively. ABCS allows the coexistence of free will alongside—but unrestrained by—the chain of causality in the decision-making process with the help of awareness. “I” also allows for DSIA, which is a key step in the awareness process. This intertwined process is crucial for our consciousness. Similar to AI, the mind is devoid of any form of self-recognition without awareness. Self-awareness is a collaborative function of “I” and the mind. “I” is instrumental in the sense of self-awareness, but on its own, it is selfless. Additionally, “I” is the heart of the decision-making process. Therefore, AI is missing “I,” a selfless master of the mind.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albuquerque J, Deshauer D, Grof P (2003) Descartes’ passions of the soul: seeds of psychiatry? J Affect Disord. 76:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00104-0
Antonakou EI, Triarhou LC (2017) Soul, butterfly, mythological nymph: psyche in philosophy and neuroscience. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 75:176–179. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20170012
Baars BJ (1988) A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New York
Bennett MR (2017) Development of the concept of mind. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 41:943–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670701689477
Chalmers DJ (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Consci Stud 2(3):200–219
Chisholm R (1966) Freedom and action. In: Keith L (ed) Freedom and Determinism. Random House, pp 11–40.
Colman W (2017) Soul in the world: symbolic culture as the medium for psyche. J Anal Psychol 62:32–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12278
Dehaene S, Kerszberg M, Changeux J-P (1998) A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:14529–14534. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529
Dennett D (1984) Elbow room: the varieties of free will worth wanting. MIT Press, Cambridge (ISBN: 0-262-04077-8)
Dennett D, Kinsbourne M (1992) Time and the observer, the where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behav Brain Sci 15:183–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068229
Dreyfus H (1972) What computers can’t do. MIT Press, New York (ISBN 978-0-06-011082-6)
Facco E, Lucangeli D, Tressoldi P (2017) On the science of consciousness: epistemological reflections and clinical implications. Explore (NY) 13:163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2017.02.007
Farhadi, A. (in press). Trilogy theory of mind: Introducing a selfless master of mind.
Frankfurt HG (1969) Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. J Philos 66(23):829–839
Ginet C (1966) Might we have no choice? In: Keith L (ed) Freedom and determinisim. Random House. pp 87–104
Ginet C (2008) In defense of a non-causal account of reasons explanations. J Ethics 12(3/4): 229–237. Retrieved August 23, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40345380
Graziano MS, Webb TW (2015) The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness. Front Psychol 6:500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00500
Kane R (1999) Responsibility, luck, and chance. J Philos 96:217–240
Katz L (2009) Robo-scientist makes gene discovery-on its own. Crave-CNET News.cnet.com. Retrieved 2010–07–29.
Lamme VA (2006) Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends Cogn Sci 10(11):494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.001
Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK (1983) Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 106(3):623–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623
Lucas JR (1961) Minds, machines and gödel. Philosophy 36 (137): 112–27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3749270.
Markoff J (2009) Scientists worry machines may outsmart man. NY Times, July 26, 2009.
O’Connor T (1993) Indeterminism and free agency: three recent views. Philos Phenomenol Res 53(3):499–526
Rosenthal DM (2002) How many kinds of consciousness? Conscious Cogn 11(4):653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8100(02)00017-x
Russell SJ, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach (2nd ed). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. ISBN 0–13–790395–2
Saraswathi TS (2005) Hindu worldview in the development of selfways: the “Atman” as the real self. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev 109:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.136
Searle J (1980) Minds, brains and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3:417–457
Shute C (1961) The dilemma of determinism after seventy-five years. Mind 70: 331–350. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2251621
Tononi G, Boly M, Massimini M, Koch C (2016) Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nat Rev Neurosci 17(7):450–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.44
Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 236:433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
Acknowledgement
I want to thank the insightful comments and feedbacks offered by Dr. Shahriar Shadkhoo and Professor Patrick grim during the preparation of this manuscript.
Funding
There was no funding source for this research and manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farhadi, A. There is no “I” in “AI”. AI & Soc 36, 1035–1046 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01136-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01136-2