Abstract
The popularity of the stakeholder model has been achieved thanks to its powerful visual scheme and its very simplicity. Stakeholder management has become an important tool to transfer ethics to management practice and strategy. Nevertheless, legitimate criticism continues to insist on clarification and emphasises on the perfectible nature of the model. Here, rather than building on the discussion from a philosophical or theoretical point of view, a different and innovative approach has been chosen: the analysis will return to the origin of stakeholder theory and will keep the graphical framework firmly in perspective. It will confront the stakeholder model’s graphical representation to the discussion on stakeholder definition, stakeholder identification and categorisation, to re-centre the debate to the strategic origin of the stakeholder model. The ambiguity and the vagueness of the stakeholder concept are discussed from managerial and legal approaches. The impacts of two major shortcomings of the popular stakeholder framework are examined: the boundaries and the level of the firm’s environment, and the ambivalent position of pressure groups and regulators. Working pragmatically, with a focus on the managerial and organisational perspective, an attempt is made to clarify the categorisations and classifications by introducing new terminology with a distinction between stakeholders, stakewatchers and stakekeepers. The analysis will finally lead to a proposed upgraded and refined version of the stakeholder model, with incremental ameliorations close to Freeman’s original model and a return of focus to its essence, the managerial implications in a strategic approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen T. 1966. Performance of Information Channels in the Transfer of Technology. Industrial Management Review, 8(1): 87–98
Anderson J. 1980. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
Andriof J., Waddock S., Husted B., Sutherland Rahman, S. 2002. Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield
Argandona A. 1998. The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10): 1093–1102
Argenti J. 1997, Stakeholders: The Case Against. Long Range Planning, 30(3): 441–445
Argenti P. 1998. Corporate Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill
Attarça, M. and T. Jacquot: 2005, ‹La représentation de la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises: une confrontation entre les approches théoriques et les visions managériales’, Paper presented at the XIViéme Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique, Angers
Attas D. 2004. A Moral Stakeholder Theory of the Firm. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3): 312–318
Bingham L., Nabatchi T., O’Leary R. 2005. The New Governance: Practices and Process for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. Public Administration Review, 65(5): 547
Blair M. 1998. For Whom Should Corporations be Run?: An Economic Rationale for Stakeholder Management. Long Range Planning, 31(2): 195–200
Boatright J. 1994. Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation: Or, What’s so Special About Shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 393–407
Bowie N. 1999. Business Ethics – a Kantian Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
Campbell A. 1997. Stakeholders: The Case in Favour. Long Range Planning, 30(3): 446–449
Cappelen A. 2004. Two Approaches to Stakeholder Identification. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3): 319–325
Carroll A. 1991. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4): 39–48
Carroll A., Buchholtz A. 2006. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management (6th ed.). Mason: Thompson Learning
Child J., Marcoux A. 1999. Freeman and Evan: Stakeholder Theory in the Original Position. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2): 207–225
Clarkson M. 1994. The Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory. Business & Society, 33(1): 82–131
Clarkson M. 1995. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92–117
Clarkson, M. (ed.): 1998. The Corporation and Its Stakeholders – the Classic and Contemporary Readings. University of Toronto Press
Coffee J. 2006. Gatekeepers: The Role of Professions in Corporate Governance. Oxford: University Press
Collier J., Roberts J. 2001. An Ethic for Corporate Governance? Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1): 67–71
Collins, J. and J. Porras: 1994, Built to Last (Harper-Business)
Cooper, G. and C. Argyris (eds.): 1998, The Concise Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management (Blackwell)
Crane, A. and D. Matten: 2004, Business Ethics: A European Perspective (Oxford University Press)
Cyert R., March J. 1963. The Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Dentchev, N.: 2008, `To What Extent is Business & Society Literature Idealistic?', Business & Society (Forthcoming)
Dill W. 1958. Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1958: 409–442
Dodd, M.: 1932, ‹For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?’, Harvard Law Review 45(7), 1145–1163 (in Clarkson (ed.), 1998)
Donaldson T. 2002. The Stakeholder Revolution and the Clarkson Principles. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 107–111
Donaldson T., Dunfee, T. 1994. Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contract Theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 252–284
Donaldson T., Preston, L. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91
Egels, N.: 2005, Sorting Out the Mess, A Review of Definitions of Ethical Issues in Business. Center for Business in Society, GRI, Göteborg University
Evan W., Freeman E. 1988. A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In: Beauchamp T., Bowie N. (eds), Ethical Theory and Business, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall
Fassin, Y.: 2008, ‹Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation’, Journal of Business Ethics, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9474-5
Ferrell O., 2004. Business Ethics and Customer Stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2): 126–129
Fombrun, C. 1996, Reputation – Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Freeman E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman
Freeman E. 1994. The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 409–421
Freeman E. 1999. Divergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 233–236
Freeman E. 2000, Business Ethics at the Millenium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1): 169–180
Freeman, E.: 2003, Lecture – Stakeholder Management Revisited: What’s the State of the Art? Leuven, 20 November
Freeman E. 2004. The Stakeholder Approach Revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3):220–241
Freeman E., Evan W. 1990. Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4): 337–359
Freeman E., McVea J. 2001, A Stakeholder Approach to Management: The State of the Art. In Hitt M., Freeman E., Harrison J. (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Freeman E., Reed D. 1994. Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3): 88–106
Friedman A., Miles S. 2006. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Frooman J. 1999. Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review 24(102):191–205
Garriga E., Melé, D. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2):51–71
Gibson K. 2000. The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3): 245–257
Gond, J.-P. and S. Mercier: 2004, ‹Les théories des parties prenantes : une synthèse critique de la littérature’, Actes du Congrès de l’Association francophone des ressources humaines, Montréal. http://www.agrh2004-esg.uqam.ca/pdf/Tome1/Gond_Mercier.pdf
Goodpaster K. 1991. Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1): 53–72
Hall J., Vredenburg H. 2005. Managing Stakeholder Ambiguity. MIT Sloan Management Review. 47(1): 11–13
Hansen U., Bode M., Moosmayer D. 2004. Stakeholder Theory Between General and Contextual Approaches – a German View. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3): 312–318
Harrison J., Freeman E. 1999. Stakeholders, Social Responsibility and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 479–485
Harrison J., Freeman E. 2004. Democracy in and Around Organizations: Is Organizational Democracy Worth the Effort? Academy of Management Executive, 18(3): 49–52
Harrison J., St. John C. 1996. Managing and Partnering with External Stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 10(2): 46–60
Heene A., Dentchev N. 2006. A Strategic Perspective on Stakeholder Management. Accountancy & Bedrijfskunde, 26(1): 25–34
Hendry J. 2001. Missing the Target: Normative Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Governance Debate. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1): 159–176
Hill C., Jones T. 1992. Stakeholder – Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 133–154
Jawahar I., McLaughlin G. 2001. Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: An Organizational Life Cycle Approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 397–414
Jensen M. 2002. Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235–256
Jones T. 1995. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–437
Jones T., Wicks A. 1999. Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 206–221
Kaler J. 2002. Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder Identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39: 91–99
Kaler J. 2003. Differentiating Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 46: 71–83
Kelly, G., D. Kelly and A. Gamble (eds.): 1997, Stakeholder Capitalism (St. Martin’s Press, New York)
Key S. 1999. Toward a New Theory of the Firm: A Critique of Stakeholder “Theory”. Management Decision, 37(4): 317–328
Kochan T. A., Rubinstein S. A. 2000. Toward a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: The Saturn Partnership. Organization Science, 11(4): 367–386
Kotler P.: 1967, Marketing Management, Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs)
Kress G., Van Leeuwen T. 1996. Reading Images – the Grammar of Visual Design. London, Routledge
Langtry B. 1994. Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 431–443
Lépineux F. 2005, Stakeholder Theory, Society and Social Cohesion. Corporate Governance, 5(2): 99–110
Marcoux A. 2003. A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1): 1–24
Maruyama M.: 1986, Toward Picture-Coded Information Systems. Futures, 18, 450–452
Metcalfe C. 1998, The Stakeholder Corporation. Business Ethics: A European Review 7(1), 30–36
Meyer A. 1991. Visual Data in Organizational Research. Organization Science, 2(2): 218–236
Mintzberg H.: 1979, The Structure of Organizations, A Synthesis of the Research (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs)
Mintzberg H.: 1983, Power in and Around Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs)
Mitchell R., Agle B., Wood D. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886
Moore G. 1999. Tinged Shareholder Theory: Or What’s so Special About Stakeholders? Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(2): 117–127
Nasi, J.: 1995, Understanding Stakeholder Thinking (Helsinki, LSR-Julkaisut Oy)
Orts E., Strudler A. 2002. The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 215–234
Ouchi W.: 1981, Theory Z – How American Business can Meet the Japanese Challenge (Addison-Wesley, Reading)
Pascale R., Athos A. 1982, The Art of Japanese Management (Simon & Schuster, New York)
Pesqueux Y., Damak-Ayadi S. 2005. Stakeholder Theory in Perspective. Corporate Governance, 5(2): 5–21
Peters T., Waterman R. 1982. In Search of Excellence. New York, Harper & Rowe
Phillips R.: 1997, Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 51–67
Phillips R. 1999. On Stakeholder Delimitation. Business & Society, 38(1): 32–34
Phillips R. 2003a. Stakeholder Theory and Organization Ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler
Phillips R. 2003b. Stakeholder Legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1): 25–41
Phillips R., Freeman E., Wicks A. 2003. What Stakeholder Theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4): 479–502
Phillips R., Reichart J. 2000. The Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness-Based Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(2): 185–197
Porter M. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press
Post J., Preston L., Sachs S. 2002. Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review, 45(1): 6–28
Post, J., L. Preston and S. Sachs: 2002b, Redefining the Corporation – Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth (Stanford Business Books)
Preston L., Donaldson T. 1999. Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 619–620
Rawls J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Rowley T. 1997. Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887–910
Savage G., Nix T., Whitehead J., Blair J. 1991. Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders. Academy of Management Review, 5(2): 61–75
Shankman N. 1999. Reframing the Debate Between Agency and Stakeholder Theories of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(4-1): 319–334
Spence L., Coles A.-M., Harris L. 2001. The Forgotten Stakeholder? Ethics and Social Responsibility in Relation to Competitors. Business and Society Review, 106(4): 331–352
Sternberg E., 1996. The Defects of Stakeholder Theory. Corporate Governance, 1:3–10
Stoney C., Winstanley D. 2001. Stakeholding: Confusion or Utopia? Mapping the Conceptual Terrain. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6): 600–623
Valor C. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability. Business & Society Review, 110(2): 191–212
Van den Berghe L.: 2002, Corporate Governance in a Globalising World: Convergence or Divergence?: A European Perspective (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
Venkataraman, S.: 2002, ‹Stakeholder Value Equilibrium and the Entrepreneurial Process’, Business Ethics Quarterly, The Ruffin series: Special Issue 3, 45–58
Waxenberger B., Spence L. 2003, Reinterpretation of a Metaphor: From Stakes to Claims. Strategic Change, 12: 239–249
Weaver G., Treviño L. 1994. Normative and Empirical Business Ethics: Separation, Marriage of Convenience, or Marriage of Necessity? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2): 129–143
Weiss, A.: 1995, ‹Cracks in the Foundations of Stakeholder Theory’, Electronic Journal of Radical Organizational Theory, http://www.mgnt.waikato.ac.nz/research/ejrot:Vol1_1/weiss.pdf
Werhane, P. and E. Freeman (eds.): 1997, The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics (Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford), pp. 460–462
Wheeler D., Silampää M. 1997. The Stakeholder Corporation, a Blueprint for Maximizing Stakeholder Value. London: Pitman
Wicks A. 1996. Overcoming the Separation Thesis: The Need for a Reconsideration of Business and Society Research. Business & Society, 35(1): 89–118
Williamson O. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press
Winn M. 2001. Building Stakeholder Theory with a Decision Modelling Methodology. Business & Society, 40(2): 133–166
Wolfe R. A., Putler D. S., 2002. How Tight are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups? Organizational Science, 13(1): 64–82
Worren N., Moore K., Elliott R. 2002. When Theories Become Tools: Toward a Framework for Pragmatic Validity. Human Relations, 55(10): 1227–1249
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fassin, Y. The Stakeholder Model Refined. J Bus Ethics 84, 113–135 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9677-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9677-4