Notes
I doubt very much that Cheney and Seyfarth are going to deny that baboons feel pain or even pleasure. This makes their conflation of consciousness and self-consciousness only the more puzzling.
Similarly, the authors open the twelfth chapter with the claim, “Darwin’s goal was to link metaphysics with survival and reproduction” (p. 273).
Reference
Baillargeon R (2002) The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy: a summary in eight lessons. In: Goswami U (ed) Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Blackwell Publishing, Malden
Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1990) How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2007) Baboon metaphysics: the evolution of a social mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Davidson D (1982) Rational animals. Dialectica 36(4):317–327
DeGrazia D (1996) Taking animals seriously: mental life and moral status. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gómez JC (2004) Apes, monkeys, children, and the growth of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
Thanks are owed to members of the Novel Tech Ethics research team for helpful comments on an earlier draft. This work was supported by a research grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fenton, A. D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind. A Review. Biol Philos 24, 129–136 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9118-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9118-x