Skip to main content
Log in

A New Science Publishing System for a Budding Science Publishing Crisis

  • Opinion
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current science publishing system is in need of a positive transformation for the good of scientists and society as a whole. Herein, we propose features that, in our view, will distinguish the science publishing system of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agoramoorthy, G. (2017). Time for revelation: Unmasking the anonymity of blind reviewers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23, 313–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, B. C. (2015). Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? PeerJ, 3, e981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, K. (2016). Does it take too long to publish research? Nature, 530, 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. (2015). Scientific theory, the publishing crisis and the wisdom of editors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 132, 427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Carlos Fernandez-Patron or Eugenio Hardy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernandez-Patron, C., Hardy, E. A New Science Publishing System for a Budding Science Publishing Crisis. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 805–808 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9902-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9902-6

Keywords

Navigation