Skip to main content

From Capital to Documediality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards a Philosophy of Digital Media

Abstract

Documediality indicates the allegiance between the constitutive power of documents and the mobilizing power of the media. The chapter proposes to treat documediality as the ending point of a great historical transformation whose previous phases have been capitalism and mediality. Capitalism in the strict sense corresponds to the economic era of production, and to the political era of liberalism. When populism prevails over liberalism, and communication has the upper hand over production, we enter the phase of mediality. Finally, documediality corresponds to a third phase, characterized by recording: that is, by the use of a huge apparatus, namely the Web, which has the essential feature of keeping track of any interaction. This chapter highlights the key features of documediality in comparison to those of capitalism and mediality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This transformation is the focus of Richard Sennett’s research. See in particular Sennet (1998).

References

  • Debord, Guy. 1994. The Society of Spectacle. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenicucci, Jacopo, and Milad Doueihi, eds. 2017. La confiance à l’ère numérique. Paris: Éditions Berger-Levrault et Éditions Rue d’Ulm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraris, Maurizio. 2012. Documentality. Why It is Necessary to Leave Traces. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John Rogers. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennet, Richard. 1998. The Corrosion of Character, The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York and London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, Hernando. 2000. The Mystery of Capital. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieviorka, Michel. 2017. Face à la “postvérité” et au “complotisme”. Socio 8: 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Ferraris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ferraris, M. (2018). From Capital to Documediality. In: Romele, A., Terrone, E. (eds) Towards a Philosophy of Digital Media. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75759-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics