Notes
Routledge. 2021. Book Series—Transforming Legal Histories. https://www.routledge.com/Transforming-Legal-Histories/book-series/LAWHISTORY. Accessed 13 December 2021.
References
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.
Cotterrell, Roger. 1998. Why Must Legal Ideas be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society 25: 171.
Conaghan, Joanne. 2000. Resassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law. Journal of Law and Society 3: 351–385.
Lacey, Nicola. 2015. Jurisprudence, History, and the Institutional Quality of Law. Virginia Law Review 4: 101.
Lobban, Michael. 2014. Sociology, History and the “Internal” Study of Law. In Law, Society and Community: Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell, ed. Richard Nobles and David Schiff, 39. Farnham: Ashgate.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1982. Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory. Signs 7: 515–544.
Munro, Vanessa E. 2006. Resemblances of Identity: Ludwig Wittgenstein and Contemporary Feminist Legal Theory. Res Publica 12: 137–162.
Nash, Jennifer C. 2021. On the Beginning of the World: Dominance Feminism, Afropessimism and the Meanings of Gender. Feminist Theory 1–19. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14647001211034084 .
Sandberg, Russell. 2014. Religion, Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandberg, Russell. 2021. Subversive Legal History: A Manifesto for the Future of Legal Education. Oxford: Routledge.
Tilly, Louise A. 1980. Social History and its Critics. Theory and Society 9(5): 668–670.
Tomlins, Christopher. 2012. What is Left of the Law and Society Paradigm After Critique? Law and Social Inquiry 37: 155–156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferguson, R. Russell Sandberg: Subversive Legal History: A Manifesto for the Future of Legal Education. Fem Leg Stud 30, 371–377 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-022-09490-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-022-09490-w