Skip to main content
Log in

Militant atheism, pragmatism, and the God-shaped hole

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses recent examples of militant atheism. It considers the theistic reply that describes atheism as deriving from a “God-shaped hole” in the human soul. The paper will argue that American pragmatism offers a middle path that avoids militant atheism without suffering from this problem. The paper describes this middle path and considers the problem that is seen in Rorty’s recent work: how the pragmatist can remain critical of religious fundamentalism without succumbing to a militant version of atheism. The solution proposed is tolerant acceptance of religion along with melioristic criticism developed within shared norms of inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken S. and Hodges M. (2006). Wittgenstein, Dewey and the possibility of religion. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 20: 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman P. (2003). Terror and liberalism. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer P. (2001). Religion explained. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford W.K. (1964). The ethics of belief. In: Kaufmann, W. (eds) Religion from Tolstoy to Camus. Harper Torchbooks, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. (2006). The god delusion. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D. (2006). Breaking the spell. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J. (1934). A common faith. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala A. (2005). Tolerance and the ethical life. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala A. (2007). What would Jesus really do? The power and limits of Jesus’ moral teachings. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberry N.K. (2006). Bernstein and Rorty on justification by faith alone. In: Davaney, S. and Frisina, W. (eds) The Pragmatic Century. SUNY Press, Albany, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris S. (2004). The end of faith. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2006). An atheist manifesto at Truthdig.com (http://www.truthdig.com/dig/item/200512_an_atheist_manifesto/).

  • Hitchens C. (2007). God is not great. Twelve, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W. (1964). The will to believe. In: Kaufmann, W. (eds) Religion from Tolstoy to Camus. Harper Torchbooks, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W. (1981). Pragmatism. Indianapolis, Hackett

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard S. (1980). The sickness unto death. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritain J. (1949). On the meaning of contemporary atheism. The Review of Politics 11(3): 267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, B. (1660). Pensées. At “Christian Classics” etext library: www.ccel.org/ccel/pascal/pensees.html.

  • Rorty, R., & Engel, P. (2007). What’s the use of truth? Columbia University Press.

  • Rorty R. (1998). Pragmatism as romantic polytheism. In: Dickstein, M. (eds) The revival of pragmatism. Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (2000). Philosophy and social hope. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (2001). Decline of redemptive truth and the rise of a literary culture from: http://olincenter.uchicago.edu/pdf/rorty.pdf.

  • Rorty R. (2002). Cultural politics and arguments for God. In: Frankenberry, N.K. (eds) Radical interpretation in religion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (2003). Religion in the public square: A reconsideration. Journal of Religious Ethics 31(1): 141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (2004). Philosophy as “Transitional Genre”. In: Benhabib, S. and Frase, N. (eds) Pragmatism, critique, judgment: Richard J. Bernstein. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Spong J.S. (1998). Why Christianity must change or die. San Francisco, HarperCollins

    Google Scholar 

  • Spong J.S. (2001). A new Christianity for a new world. San Francisco, HaperCollins

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich P. (2005). The new being. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Fiala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiala, A. Militant atheism, pragmatism, and the God-shaped hole. Int J Philos Relig 65, 139–151 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9188-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9188-3

Keywords

Navigation