Abstract
While poststructuralist feminist theorists have clarified our understanding of the gendered subject as produced through a matrix of language, culture, and psycho-sexual affects, they have found agency difficult to ground. I argue that this is because in these theories the body has served primarily as an inscribed surface. In response to this surface body, particular to this age, I have turned to Merleau-Ponty's concept of depth which allows us to theorize the agency crucial to feminist politics. While the poststructuralists' rejection of depth is largely due to its roots in Cartesian rationality, depth is much more than this. Rather than allowing for the impossibility of political action, depth means that as bodily moving and acting subjects we are part of Being, and thus part of the questions raised in this age, even if it is a mark of this age that this tends to be forgotten.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Casey, E.S. (1991). “The element of voluminousness”: Depth and place re-examined. In M.C. Dillon (Ed.), Merleau-Ponty Vivant. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Chow, R. (1992). Postmodern automatons. In J. Butler and J.W. Scott (Eds.). Feminists theorize the political. New York: Routledge.
Duden, B. (1991). Der Frauenleib als öffentlicher Ort: vom Mißbrauch des Begriffs Leben. Hamburg: Luchterhand Literatur Verlag GmbH.
Duden, B. (1987). Geschichte unter der Haut. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.
Finn, G. (1992). The politics of contingency: The contingency of politics—On the political implications of Merleau-Ponty's ontology of the flesh. In T.W. Busch and S. Gallagher (Eds.). Hermeneutics and Post-Modernism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Gregg, R. (1993). “Choice” as a double-edged sword: Information, guilt and mother-blaming in a high-tech age. Women and Health 20 (3): 53–73.
Hindmarch, G. (1976). A birth account. Vancouver: New Star Books.
Hubbard, R. and Landall, M. (1988). The shape of red: Insider/outsider reflections. San Francisco: Cleis Press.
King, C.R. (1992). The ideological and technological shaping of motherhood. Women and Health 19 (2/3): 1–12.
Kolker, A. and Burke, B.M. (1993). Deciding about the unknown: Perceptions of risk of women who have prenatal diagnosis. Women and Health 20 (4): 37–57.
Mallin, S.B. (1990). Chiasm, line and art. In H. Pietersma (Ed.) Merleau-Ponty: Critical essays. Boston: University Press of America, Inc.
Mazis, G.A. (1988). Merleau-Ponty: The depth of memory as the depth of the world. In H.J. Silverman et al. (Eds.). The Horizons of Continental Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Eye and mind. In J. Edie (Ed.) The primacy ofperception. Trans. C. Dallery. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology ofperception. Trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Quéniart, A. (1992). Risky business: Medical definitions of pregnancy. In Currie, D.H. and Raoul, V. (Eds.). Anatomy of Gender. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
Scott, J.W. (1992). “Experience”. In. J. Butler and J.W. Scott (Eds.). Feminists theorize the political. New York: Routledge.
Stafford, B.M. (1991). Body of criticism: Imaging the unseen in Enlightenment art and medicine. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Steinbock, A.J. (1987). Merleau-Ponty's concept of depth. Philosophy Today 31 (4/4): 336–351.
Wynn, F. (Disseration in progress). The Forgotten Harbouring: The Recollection of Early Mothering. Toronto: York University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fielding, H. Grounding agency in depth: The implications of Merleau-Ponty's thought for the politics of feminism. Hum Stud 19, 175–184 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131492
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131492