References
Arnold K, Zuberbühler K (2006) Semantic combinations in primate calls. Nature 441:303
Balari S, Benítez-Burraco A, Camps M et al (2011) The archaeological record speaks: bridging anthropology and linguistics. Int J Evol Biol 1:1–17. doi:10.1177/0539018405058205
Chomsky N (1956) Three models for the description of language. IRE Trans Inf Theory 2:113–124
Deacon T (1997) The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the human brain. Norton, New York
Fitch WT, Friederici AD (2012) Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview. Phil Trans R Soc London B 367:1933–1955
Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–1579
Ouattara K, Lemasson A, Zuberbühler K (2009) Campbell’s monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:22026–22031
Owen R (1848) On the archetype and homologies of the vertebrate skeleton. John Van Voorst, London
ten Cate C, Okanoya K (2012) Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 367:1984–1994
Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by a European Research Council Advanced Grant SOMACCA (No. 230604) awarded to William Tecumseh Fitch. The funders had no role in the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filippi, P. Computo ergo Sum. Biol Theory 9, 115–118 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0147-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0147-6