Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 28, 2014

Raymond Boudon as Social Theorist: A Comparison with Ludwig von Mises

  • Renaud Fillieule EMAIL logo

Abstract

This comparison between Boudon and Mises focuses on the main tenets of their respective conceptions of social science. It covers action theory, the theory of belief, the epistemology of social science, and also addresses the topic of liberalism.

References

Benedict, R. 1934. Patterns of Culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Bhaduri, A. 1976. “A Study of Agricultural Backwardness under Semi-Feudalism.” Economic Journal83:12037.10.2307/2231104Search in Google Scholar

Blaug, M. 1992. The Methodology of Economics. Or How Economists Explain, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511528224Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1973. L’inégalité des Chances. La Mobilité Sociale dans les Sociétés Industrielles. Paris: Armand Colin.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1977. Effets Pervers et Ordre Social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1984. La Place du Désordre. Critique des Théories du Changement Social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1986. L’idéologie ou l’Origine des Idées Reçues. Paris: Fayard.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1989. “Les Sciences Humaines Sont-Elles Des Sciences?” In Encyclopédie Philosophique, Vol. 1, 93842. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1990a. L’art de se Persuader des Idées Douteuses, Fragiles ou Fausses. Paris: Fayard.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1990b. “Les Causes de l’Inégalité des Chances Scolaires.” Commentaire51:53342.10.3917/comm.051.0533Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R., ed. 1992. Traité de Sociologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1994. “Relativiser le Relativisme: Quand la Sociologie Réfute la Sociologie de la Science.” Revue Tocqueville/Tocqueville Review15(2):10931.10.3138/ttr.15.2.109Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1995. Le Juste et le Vrai. Études sur l’Objectivité des Valeurs et de la Connaissance. Paris: Fayard.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1998a. “Social Mechanisms without Black Boxes.” In Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by P. Hedström and R. Swedberg, 172203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511663901.008Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1998b. Études sur les Sociologues Classiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 1999. Le Sens des Valeurs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 2000. Études sur les Sociologues Classiques II. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 2002. Déclin de la Morale? Déclin des Valeurs?Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.10.3917/puf.boud.2002.01Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 2003. Raison, Bonnes Raisons. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 2004. Pourquoi les Intellectuels n’Aiment pas le Libéralisme. Paris: Odile Jacob.10.3917/comm.104.0772Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 2008. Essais sur la Théorie Générale de la Rationalité. Action Sociale et Sens Commun. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 2010. La Sociologie comme Science. Paris: La Découverte.10.3917/dec.boudo.2010.01Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R. 2011a. “La Sociologie comme Science.” Commentaire135:73142.10.3917/comm.135.0731Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R.2011b. “La Scientificité de la Sociologie Durkheimienne.” Paper presented at the conference on Durkheim et ses Usages dans les Sciences Sociales. Paris, 4–5 November 2011, 17 p.Search in Google Scholar

Boudon, R., and F.Bourricaud. 2000 [1982]. Dictionnaire Critique de la Sociologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, L. E., and M.Felson. 1979. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.” American Sociological Review44:588608.10.2307/2094589Search in Google Scholar

Coleman, J., et al. 1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill Co.Search in Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. 1895. Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique. Paris: Alcan.Search in Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. 1897. Le Suicide: Étude de Sociologie. Paris: Alcan.Search in Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. 1968 [1912]. Les Formes Élémentaires de la Vie Religieuse: Le Système Totémique en Australie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, M. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics, edited by M.Friedman, 343. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581427.002Search in Google Scholar

Hazlitt, H. 2008 [1946]. Economics in One Lesson. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Hoppe, H.-H. 1995. Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Hotelling, H. 1929. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal39:4157.10.2307/2224214Search in Google Scholar

Hülsmann, J. G. 2003. “Introduction to the Third Edition: From Value Theory to Praxeology.” In Epistemological Problems of Economics, edited by L.von Mises, ixlv. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Hülsmann, J. G. 2007. Mises. The Last Knight of Liberalism. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Kardiner, A. 1939. The Individual and His Society. The Psychodynamics of Primitive Social Organization. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lepenies, W. 2003 [1985]. Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lévy-Bruhl, L. 1922. La Mentalité Primitive. Paris: Alcan.10.1097/00005053-192306000-00119Search in Google Scholar

Lévy-Bruhl, L., et al. 1923. “La Mentalité Primitive.” Bulletin De La Société Française De Philosophie no. 23.2, séance du 15 février 1923.Search in Google Scholar

Mannheim, K. 1929. Ideologie und Utopie. Bonn: F. Cohen.Search in Google Scholar

McClelland, D. C. 1961. The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.10.1037/14359-000Search in Google Scholar

Mead, M. 1964. Anthropology: A Human Science. Selected Papers, 1939–1960. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.Search in Google Scholar

Merllié, D. 2012. “Durkheim, Lévy-Bruhl et la ‘Pensée Primitive’: Quel Différend?L’année Sociologique62(2):42946.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 1957. Theory and History. An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 1981 [1922]. Socialism. An Economic and Sociological Analysis. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 1996 [1929]. Critique of Interventionism. Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 1998 [1940]. Interventionism. an Economic Analysis. Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 1998 [1949]. Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 2003 [1933]. Epistemological Problems of Economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 2005 [1927]. Liberalism. The Classical Tradition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 2006 [1962]. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. An Essay on Method. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. von. 2008 [1956]. The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Oberschall, A. 1973. Social Conflicts and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Pareto, V. 1968 [1916]. Traité de Sociologie Générale. Genève: Librairie Droz.10.3917/droz.paret.1968.01Search in Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. 1959 [1934]. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.10.1063/1.3060577Search in Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. 1972. Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rothbard, M. N. 1957. “In Defense of ‘Extreme Apriorism’.” Southern Economic Journal23(3): 31420.10.2307/1054221Search in Google Scholar

Simmel, G. 1984 [1923]. Les Problèmes de la Philosophie de l’Histoire, 5th ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Sombart, W. 1906. Warum gibt es in den Vereinigten Staaten keinen Sozialismus?Tübingen: Mohr.Search in Google Scholar

Tocqueville, A. de. 1952 [1856]. L’Ancien Régime et la Révolution. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A., and D.Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science185(4157):112431.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124Search in Google Scholar

Vierkandt, A. 1928. Gesellschaftslehre: Hauptprobleme der philosophischen Soziologie, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Enke.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, M. 1952 [1917–1920]. Ancient Judaism. Glencoe: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-10-28
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 6.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jeeh-2014-0013/html
Scroll to top button