Abstract
I begin by formulating the problem of the nature of fallacy in terms of the logic of the negative evaluation of argument, that is, in terms of a theory of logical criticism; here I discuss several features of my approach and several advantages vis-à-vis other approaches; a main feature of my approach is the concern to avoid both formalist and empiricist excesses. I then define six types of fallaciousness, labeled formal, explanatory, presuppositional, positive, semantical, and persuasive; they all involve arguments whose conclusion may be said not to follow from the premises, that is, they involve the logical evaluation of relationships among propositions. I also provide a set of data consisting of four historical cases or nine specific instances of fallacious arguments; these all pertain to the Copernican controversy about the earth's motion in the seventeenth century. I end with a discussion of further problems and inquiries that deserve attention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angell, R. B.: 1964, Reasoning and Logic, New York: Appleton.
Bencivenga, E.: 1979, ‘On Good and Bad Arguments’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 247–59.
Cohen, L. J.: 1982, ‘Are People Programmed to Commit Fallacies?’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 12, 251–74.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard (eds.): 1986, Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. Papers contributed to the First International Conference on Argumentation of the University of Amsterdam, June 3–6, 1986. Foris Publications: Dordrecht/Providence, PDA3.
Evans, J. St. B. T.: 1982, The Psychology of Deductive Reasoning, London: Routledge.
Evans, J. St. B. T.: 1983a, ‘Selective Processes in Reasoning’, in Evans (1983b), pp. 135–63.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (ed.): 1983b, Thinking and Reasoning: Psychological Approaches, London: Routledge.
Feyerabend, P. K.: 1975, Against Method, London, NLB.
Finocchiaro, M. A.: 1979, ‘The Psychological Explanation of Reasoning: Logical and Methodological Problems’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9, 277–91.
Finocchiaro, M. A.: 1980, Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Finocchiaro, M. A.: 1981, ‘Fallacies and the Evaluation of Reasoning’, American Philosophical Quarterly 18, 13–22.
Finocchiaro, M. A.: 1986, ‘An Historical Approach to the Study of Argumentation’, in Frans H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.).
Finocchiaro, M. A. (1987).: Review of Walton's Arguer's Position. Philosophy and Rhetoric 20, 63–65.
Galilei, G.: 1632, Dialogo sopra i Due Massimi Sistemi. Now in Opere, volume 7. National Edition in 20 vols. directed by A. Favaro. Florence: Barbera, 1890–1909.
Galilei, G.: 1953, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, translated by S. Drake, Berkeley: University of California Press.
George, R.: 1983, ‘A Postscript on Fallacies’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, 319–26.
Govier, T.: 1982, ‘Who Says There Are No Fallacies?’ Informal Logic Newsletter, vol. v, no. i, December 1982, pp. 2–10.
Govier, T.: 1985, ‘Logical Analogies’, Informal Logic, vol. vi, no. i, Winter 1985, pp. 27–33.
Grootendorst, R.: 1986, ‘Some Fallacies about Fallacies’, in Frans van Eemeren et al. (eds.).
Johnson, R. H., and J. A. Blair: 1980, ‘The Recent Development of Informal Logic’, in R. H. Johnson and J. A. Blair (eds.), Informal Logic, Inverness, CA.: Edgepress.
Johnson, R. H., and J. A. Blair: 1985, ‘Informal Logic: The Past Five Years 1978–1983’, American Philosophical Quarterly 22, 181–196.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second, enlarged edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Massey, G. J.: 1975a, ‘In Defense of the Asymmetry’, Philosophy in Context, Supplement to volume 4, pp. 44–56.
Massey, G. J.: 1975b, ‘Are There Good Arguments That Bad Arguments Are Bad?’ Philosophy in Context 4, 61–77.
Massey, G. J.: 1981a, ‘The Fallacy Behind Fallacies’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6, 489–500.
Massey, G. J.: 1981b, ‘The Pedagogy of Logic’, Teaching Philosophy 4, 303–36.
Nisbett, R. E., and L. Ross.: Human Inference, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Staal, J. F. (ed.): 1969, ‘Formal Logic and Natural Language Argumentation (A Symposium)’, Foundations of Language 5, 256–84.
Strawson, P. F.: 1952, Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen.
Walton, D. N.: 1981, ‘The Fallacy of Many Questions’, Logique et Analyse 24, 291–313.
Walton, D. N.: 1985, Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation, and Fallacy, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Walton, D. N. (in press).: ‘What is a Fallacy?’ in Eemeren and Grootendorst (in press).
Wason, P. C.: 1983, ‘Realism and Rationality in the Selection Task’, in Evans (1983b), pp. 44–75.
Wason, P. C., and P. N. Johnson-Laird: 1972, Psychology of Reasoning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Woods, J., and D. N. Walton: 1977, ‘Towards a Theory of Argument’, Metaphilosophy 8, 298–315.
Woods, J., and D. N. Walton: 1982, Argument: The Logic of Fallacies, Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Finocchiaro, M.A. Six types of fallaciousness: Toward a realistic theory of logical criticism. Argumentation 1, 263–282 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136778
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136778