Skip to main content
Log in

New Zealand Farmer Narratives of the Benefits of Reduced Human Intervention During Lambing in Extensive Farming Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Easy-care or natural lambing pertainsto those sheep able to successfully lamb andrear at least one lamb without human assistancein a difficult environment. Such sheep may havea higher survival rate, lower lamb mortality,and require less shepherding at lambing thanother sheep breeds or strains. The farmer orshepherd account of easy-care lambing revealsseveral themes. Firstly, stock were bred tosurvive or suit local environments orconditions, particularly steep hill country inNew Zealand. This involved extensive culling ofundesirable dams, regardless of how well theymight perform in traits other than the abilityto survive and to produce live lambs atweaning. Sheep that did have problems wereoften assisted, recorded or marked and thenculled at an appropriate time; thus bothartificial (culling) and natural selection wereused. Secondly, natural selection enabled theimportant traits to be identified and they weresubsequently incorporated into artificialselection programs. Thirdly, the practice wasnecessitated by the impracticality ofsupervising lambing in difficult terrain andthe cost of skilled farm labor. Finally, it wasacknowledged that disturbance at lambingcreated problems and most importantly, theeasy-care approach reduced some of the problemstraditionally associated with lambing.Easy-care lambing systems thus aim to minimizesome of the detrimental effects associated withcarefully supervised lambing in someenvironments, by selecting sheep to suit boththat environment and modern farm management.They overcame pervasive influences our culturallegacy was exerting on the way we interact withanimals, and may have produced a system more inkeeping with the biology of the animal in anextensive environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alexander, G., “Constraints to Lamb Survival,” in D. R. Lindsay and D. T. Pearce (eds.), Reproduction in Sheep (Australian Academy of Science and Australian Wool Corporation, Canberra, 1984), pp. 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelley, S., “The Art of Moral Ecology,” Ecosystem Health 1 (1995), 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (2000), “Animal Welfare - a Constraint or a Stimulus,” in D. Mellor, M. Fisher, and G. Sutherland (eds.), Innovation, Ethics, and Animal Welfare: Public Confidence in Science and Agriculture (ANZCCART, Wellington, 2000), pp. 68–72.

  • Fisher, M.W. and D. J. Mellor, “The Welfare Implications of Shepherding During Lambing in Extensive New Zealand Farming Systems,” Animal Welfare 11 (2002),157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, R. and H. de Langen, “Neonatal Behaviour in ‘Easy-Care’ Sheep,” in M. Wodzicka-Tomaszewka, T. N. Edey, and J. J. Lynch (eds.), Behaviour - Reviews in Rural Science, Behaviour in Relation to Reproduction, Management and Welfare of Farm Animals, Vol. 4 (University of New England Press, Armidale, 1980), pp. 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T. W., P. R. Lynch, D. R. H. Hall, and H-U P. Hockey, “Identification of Factors Contributing to the Improved Lamb Survival in Marshall Romney Sheep,” New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 31 (1988), 259–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T. W., L. D. Wilson, P. R. Lynch, and H-U P. Hockey, “Slope and the Choice of Birth Sites by Ewes,” New Zealand Journal Agricultural Research 32 (1989), 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, F., “How Farmers Research and Learn: The Case of Arable Farmers of East Anglia, UK,” Agriculture and Human Values 13 (1996), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackereth, V. J., “A Practical View Point of Modern Sheep Breeding,” Proceedings Australian Society of Animal Production 15 (1984), 438–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSporran, K. D. and E. D. Fielden, “Studies on Dystocia in Sheep. II: Pelvic Measurements of Ewes with Histories of Dystocia and Eutocia,” New Zealand Veterinary Journal 27 (1979), 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M., Science as Salvation. A Modern Myth and its Meaning (Routledge, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. C., “Ethical Issues Associated with Sheep Fly Strike Research, Prevention, and Control,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (2000), 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, R., R. H. Porter, F. Levy, P. Orgeur, and B. Schaal, “Role of Mother-Young Interactions in the Survival of Offspring in Domestic Mammals,” Reviews of Reproduction 5 (2000), 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, R. S., “Animal selection and Breeding Techniques that Create Diseased Populations and CompromiseWelfare,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 208 (1996), 1969–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. J. C., “Animal Welfare Considerations in Future Breeding Programmes for Farm Livestock,” Animal Breeding Abstracts 65 (1997), 645–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, V. R., “Bioethics, the Science of Survival,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine (Autumn 1970), 127–153.

  • Rauw, W. M., E. R. Kanis, E. N. Noordhuizen-Stassen, and F. J. Grommers “Undesirable Side Effects of Selection for High Production Efficiency in Farm Animals: A Review,” Livestock Production Science 56 (1998), 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. E., Farm Animal Welfare. Social, Bioethical, and Research Issues (Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. E., “On Telos and Genetic Engineering,” in A. Holland and A. Johnson (eds.), Animal Biotechnology and Ethics (Chapman & Hall, London, 1998), pp. 156–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszak, T., The Engendered Atom. Reflections on the Sexual Psychology of Science (Barclay: Konari Press, Barclay, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoe, P., N. Holtug, and H. B. Simonsen, “Ethical limits to Domestication,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9 (1996), 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobie, D., “Back Off Man, I'm a Scientist,” in M. Fisher, J. Marbrook, and G. Sutherland (eds.), Learning, Animals and the Environment: Changing the Face of the Future, Wellington: ANZCCART, Wellington, 2002), pp. 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobie, D. R., A. R. Bray, and D. O'Connell, “A Breeding Goal to Improve the Welfare of Sheep,” Animal Welfare 8 (1999), 391–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simm, G., J. Conington, S. C. Bishop, C. M. Dwyer, and S. Pattinson, “Genetic Selection for Extensive Conditions,” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49 (1996), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G., “A ‘Curious Blend’: The Successful farmer in American Farm Magazines, 1984- 1991,” Agriculture and Human Values 12(3) (1995), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. D., “Easy Care Shepherding,” Proceedings New Zealand Veterinary Association Sheep Society 5 (1975), 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, M. New Zealand Farmer Narratives of the Benefits of Reduced Human Intervention During Lambing in Extensive Farming Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16, 77–90 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021758427469

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021758427469

Navigation