Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A pragmatic defence of health status measures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A family of instruments has been developed over the last twenty five years in order to measure the individual's subjective view of his health. The instruments vary in how broadly they define health. A wide range of critiques have challenged both the validity of these measures and their uses. This paper argues that disproportionate attention has been given to one form of health status measure—the so-called utility-based measures. The ensuing controversies have distracted from the substantial progress achieved in the application of health status measures. This paper identifies the major areas of progress and argues that any serious critique needs to engage with this now sizeable body of applied knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Jones, D., Spiegelhalter, D. and Cox, D. (1992). Quality of life measures in health care 1: Applications and issues in assessment.British Medical Journal 305, 1074–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guyatt, G., Feeny, D. and Patrick, D. (1993). Measuring health-related quality of life.Annals of Internal Medicine 118, 622–629.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nordenfelt, L. (1994). Introduction. In,Concepts and Measurement of Quality of Life in Health Care, ed. by L. Nordenfelt, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grimley Evans, J. (1992). Quality of life assessments and elderly people. In,Measures of the Quality of Life, ed. by A. Hopkins, Royal College of Physicians, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gill, T. and Feinstein, A. (1994). A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements.Journal of American Medical Association 272, 619–626.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mulkay, M., Ashmore, M. and Pinch, T. (1987). Measuring the quality of life: a sociological invention concerning the application of economics to health care.Sociology 21, 541–564.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, A. (1987). Qualms about QALYs.Lancet 1, 1134–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Potts, S. (1992). The QALY and why it should be resisted. In,Philosophy and Health Care, ed. by E. Mathews and M. Menlowe, Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guyatt, G., Berman, L., Townsend, M., Pugsley, S. and Chambers, L. (1987). A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease.Thorax 42, 773–778.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peto, V., Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R. and Greenhall, R. (1995) The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson's disease.Quality of Life Research 4, 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sullivan, F., Eagers, R., Lynch, K. and Barber, J. (1987). Assessment of disability caused by rheumatic diseases in general practice.Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 46, 598–600.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tugwell, P., Bombardier, C., Buchanan, W., Goldsmith, C., Grace, E. and Hanna, B. (1987). The MACTAR patient preference disability questionnaire: an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of Rheumatology 14, 446–451.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tugwell, P., Bombardier, C., Buchanan, W., Goldsmith, C., Grace, E., Bennett, K., Williams, J.et al. (1990). Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires.Archives of Internal Medicine 150, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ruta, D. and Garratt, A. (1994). Health status to quality of life measurement. In,Measuring Health and Medical Outcomes, ed. by C. Jenkinson, UCL Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O'Boyle, C., McGee, H. and Joyce, C. (1994). Quality of life: assessing the individual. In,Advances in Medical Sociology: Quality of Life in Health Care, ed. by G. Albrecht and R. Fitzpatrick, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clayton, M. and Williams, A. (1994). Subjective health assessment and distributive justice. In,Measuring Health and Medical Outcomes, ed. by C. Jenkinson, UCL Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O'Boyle, C. (1995). Making subjectivity scientific.Lancet 345, 602.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harwood, R., Jitapunkel, S., Dickinson, E. and Ebrahim, S. (1994). Measuring handicap: motives, methods and a model.Quality in Health Care 3, 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guyatt, G. and Cok, D. (1994). Health status, quality of life and the individual.Journal of the American Medical Association 272, 630–631.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sackett, D. and Torrance, G. (1978). The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public.Journal of Chronic Diseases 31, 697–706.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nord, E. (1992). Methods for quality adjustment of life years.Social Science and Medicine 35, 559–569.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Froberg, D. and Kane, R. (1989). Methodology for measuring health state preferences—II: scaling methods.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 42, 459–471.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kind, P. and Dolan, P. (1995). The effect of past and present illness experience on the valuations of health states.Medical Care 33, AS255-AS263.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kahneman, D. and Varey, C. (1991). Notes on the psychology of utility. In,Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, ed. by J. Elster and J. Roemer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cox, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Spiegelhalter, D. and Jones, D. (1992). Quality of life assessment: can we keep it simple?Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A,155, 353–393.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bombardier, C., Ware, J., Russell, I., Chalmer, A., Read, J. and the Auranofin Cooperating Group (1986). Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter trial.American Journal of Medicine 81, 565–578.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Testa, M., Anderson, R., Nackley, J., Hollenberg, N. and the Quality of Life Hypertension Study Group (1993). Quality of life and antihypertensive therapy in men: a comparison of captopril with enalpril.New England Journal of Medicine 328, 907–913.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ware, J., Brook, R., Rogers, W., Keeler, E., Davies, A., Sherbourne, C.et al. (1986). Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care.Lancet 1, 1017–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lansky, D., Butler, J. and Waller, F. (1992). Using health status measures in the hospital setting: from acute care to ‘outcomes management’.Medical Care 30, MS57-MS73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cleary, R., Venables, C., Watson, J., Goodfellow, J. and Wright, P. (1995). Comparison of short term outcomes of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Quality in Health Care 4, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Greenfield, S. and Nelson, E. (1992). Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings.Medical Care 30, MS23-MS41.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wasson, J., Keller, A., Rubenstein, L., Hays, R., Nelson, E., Johnson, D. and the Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project (1992). Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings.Medical Care 30, MS42-MS49.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kazis, L., Callahan, L., Meenan, R. and Pincus, T. (1990). Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 43, 1243–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ahmad, W., Kernohan, E. and Baker, M. (1989). Influence of ethnicity and unemployment on the perceived health of a sample of general practice attenders.Community Medicine 11, 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reuben, D., Rubenstein, L., Hirsch, S. and Hays, R. (1992). The value of functional status as a predictor of mortality: results of a prospective study.American Journal of Medicine 93, 663–669.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Donovan, J., Frankel, S. and Eyles, J. (1993). Assessing the need for health status measures.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 47, 158–162.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Carr-Hill, R. (1989). Assumptions of the QALY procedure.Social Science and Medicine 29, 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nuffield College, Oxford and Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, UK

    Ray Fitzpatrick

Authors
  1. Ray Fitzpatrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fitzpatrick, R. A pragmatic defence of health status measures. Health Care Anal 4, 265–272 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249313

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249313

Keywords

Search

Navigation