Skip to main content

Patient-Driven Drug Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophical Issues in Pharmaceutics

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 122))

Abstract

Patient-driven drug development is an emerging approach to pharmaceutical research that is forged in rare-disease communities and patient advocacy networks. Patients and their advocates increasingly engage in drug discovery and influence early-stage drug research as clinical trial participants or through compassionate-use programs. Some advocacy groups and patients also influence which therapies are developed by financing promising treatments that otherwise would not secure funding. Though some critics of patient-driven drug development worry about the ethical and scientific implications of this new approach to research, it also has several advantages over the current system. In this essay I argue that patient-driven drug development is morally permissible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • “About | iCancer”. 2015. http://icancer.org.uk/about/. Accessed 27 Apr 2015.

  • Carroll, J. 2015, January 20. CytRx Surges after FDA Lifts a Partial Hold on Late-Stage Cancer Drug. Fierce Biotech. http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/cytrx-surges-after-fda-lifts-partial-hold-late-stage-cancer-drug/2015-01-20. Accessed 29 Apr 2015.

  • Cha, A.E. 2014, March 23. Crowdsourcing Medical Decisions: Ethicists Worry Josh Hardy Case May Set Bad Precedent. The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Bioethics. 1995. Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics 95(2): 314–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. 2001. Justice, Health, and Healthcare. The American Journal of Bioethics 1(2): 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrow, J.J., A. Sarpatwari, J. Avorn, and A.S. Kesselheim. 2015. Practical, Legal, and Ethical Issues in Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs. The New England Journal of Medicine 372(3): 279–286. doi:10.1056/NEJMhle1409465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deBronkart, D. 2013. How the E-Patient Community Helped Save My Life: An Essay by Dave deBronkart. British Medical Journal 346: f1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMasi, J.A., R.W. Hansen, and H.G. Grabowski. 2003. The Price of Innovation: New Estimates of Drug Development Costs. Journal of Health Economics 22(2): 151–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwamena, F., M. Holmes-Rovner, C.M. Gaulden, S. Jorgenson, G. Sadigh, A. Sikorskii, S. Lewin et al. 2012. Interventions for Providers to Promote a Patient-Centred Approach in Clinical Consultations. In Cochrane database of systematic reviews, ed. The Cochrane Collaboration. Chichester: Wiley. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2. Accessed 11 Aug 2016.

  • Epstein, S. 1995. The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials. Science, Technology & Human Values 20(4): 408–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanigan, J. 2012. Three Arguments against Prescription Requirements. Journal of Medical Ethics 38(10): 579–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frydman, G.J. 2009. Patient-Driven Research: Rich Opportunities and Real Risks. Journal of Participatory Medicine 1(1): e12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, H.G., and J.M. Vernon. 1983. The Regulation of Pharmaceuticals: Balancing the Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, H.G., J.M. Vernon, and L.G. Thomas. 1978. Estimating the Effects of Regulation on Innovation: An International Comparative Analysis of the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Law and Economics 21(1): 133–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, L. 2008, January 15. Justices Won’t Hear Appeal on Drugs for Terminally Ill. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkes-Jones, L. 2015, January 5. Stop Subsidizing Big Pharma. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, J.M. 2013. Moral Psychology and the Intuition That Pharmaceutical Companies Have a ‘Special’ Obligation to Society. Journal of Business Ethics 122(3): 501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E.J. 1987. Research Expenditures and the Discovery of New Drugs. The Journal of Industrial Economics 36(1): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesselheim, A.S., and J.J. Darrow. 2015. FDA Designations for Therapeutics and Their Impact on Drug Development and Regulatory Review Outcomes. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 97(1): 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F.R., and J. Waldfogel. 2008. Does Misery Love Company–Evidence from Pharmaceutical Markets before and after the Orphan Drug Act. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 15: 335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A.D. 2010. The Loneliness Of Fighting A Rare Cancer. Health Affairs 29(1): 203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015a, March 2. Deaf or Death? In Drug Trial, Parents Weigh Life vs. Hearing Loss. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Niemann-Pick Type C: A Fight to Save Children with a Drug. The Wall Street Journal. http://on.wsj.com/1due624. Accessed 10 Mar 2015.

  • Masters, A. 2015. A Plutocratic Proposal. Mosaic. http://mosaicscience.com/story/plutocratic-proposal. Accessed 7 Apr 2015.

  • Morrow, K.J. 2015, April 25. Drug Development in the Age of Social Media. Life Science Leader.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. 1973. An Evaluation of Consumer Protection Legislation: The 1962 Drug Amendments. Journal of Political Economy 81(5): 1049–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, A. 2007, August 8. Court Rejects the Right to Use Drugs Being Tested. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, F. 2014, August 24. The Ice Bucket Challenge Isn’t Going Away: But Giving Money to Disease-Specific Charities Is Still a Bad Idea. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/08/als_ice_bucket_challenge_giving_money_to_disease_specific_charities_is_a.html. Accessed 29 Apr 2015.

  • Sanghavi, D.M. 2013, October 31. How Dying Patients Get Access to Experimental Drugs. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. 2000. The Pharmaceutical Industry. In Handbook of Health Economics, ed. A.J. Culyer and J.P. Newhouse, 1297–1336. 1st edition. Elsevier. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574006400800384. Accessed 11 Aug 2016.

  • Sofer, G.J. 2008, December 30. The FDA Is Killing Crohn’s Patients. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thadhani, R. 2006. Formal Trials versus Observational Studies. In Fabry Disease: Perspectives from 5 Years of FOS, ed. A. Mehta, M. Beck, and G. Sunder-Plassmann. Oxford: Oxford PharmaGenesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. 2014, February 7. Oakland Pediatrician Opens Her Home To Patients. NBC Bay Area.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topol, E. 2015. The Patient Will See You Now: The Future of Medicine Is in Your Hands, 1st ed. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volokh, E. 2007. Medical Self-Defense, Prohibited Experimental Therapies, and Payment for Organs. Harvard Law Review 20: 1813–1846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S.N. 1981. Product Quality Regulation and New Drug Introductions: Some New Evidence from the 1970s. The Review of Economics and Statistics 63(4): 615–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, W. 2008. Market Incentives and Pharmaceutical Innovation. Journal of Health Economics 27(4): 1060–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Flanigan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flanigan, J. (2017). Patient-Driven Drug Development. In: Ho, D. (eds) Philosophical Issues in Pharmaceutics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 122. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0979-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics