Skip to main content
Log in

The Limits of Liberal Cosmopolitanism

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The essay critically reviews two recent contributions to the debate on global justice made by Darrel Moellendorf and Thomas Pogge respectively. Given both authors’ acknowledgement of the substantial contributions which liberal economic practice currently makes to ever-increasing levels of global deprivation and injustice, can we continue to assume with confidence that liberal morality is capable of providing the solution? It is a central claim of the essay that both authors are able to sustain this optimistic assumption only because of their abstraction of liberal morality from its statist political and competitive economic settings. Were these settings to be taken into account, some liberal values might be shown to be less universalisable than they are routinely assumed to be. In that case, we should not argue, implausibly, for the extension of these values to the global context, but should focus on their critical revision in the context of mature liberal societies’ domestic politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flikschuh, K. The Limits of Liberal Cosmopolitanism. Res Publica 10, 175–192 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESP.0000034639.33496.60

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESP.0000034639.33496.60

Keywords

Navigation