Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic Opposition and WordNet

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of semantic opposition; in particular, theproblem of determining adjective-verb opposition for transitive changeof state verbs and adjectivally modified grammatical objects. Semanticopposition problems of this type are a sub-case of the classic FrameProblem; the well-known problem of knowing what is preserved orchanged in the world as a result of some action or event. Bydefinition, grammatical objects of change of state verbs undergomodification. In cases where the object is adjectivally modified, theproblem reduces to determining whether the property denoted by theadjective still holds true after the event denoted by the verb. Inthis paper, we evaluate the efficacy of WordNet, a network of conceptsorganized around linguistically relevant semantic relations includingantonymy, for this task. Test examples are drawn from the linguisticliterature. Results are analyzed in detail with a view towardsproviding feedback on the concept of a network as an appropriate modelof semantic relations for problems in semantic inference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fellbaum, C., ed., 1998, WordNet, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C.J., Wooters, C., and Baker, C.F., 2001, “Building a large lexical database which provides deep semantics,” pp. 3-25 in Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC-15), B. Tsou and O. Kwong, eds.

  • Fong, S., Fellbaum, C., and Lebeaux, D., 2001, “Ghosts, shadows and resultatives: The lexical representation of verbs,” TAL 42, 755-789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grishman, R., Macleod, C., and Meyers, A., 1994, “Comlex syntax: Building a computational lexicon,” pp. 268-272 in COLING' 94, Kyoto, Japan.

  • Kowalski, R., 1979, Logic for Problem Solving, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B., 1993, English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettinger, A., 1994, Aspects of Semantic Opposition in English, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J., 1995, The Generative Lexicon, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J., 2000a, “Event-based models of change and persistence in language,” IRCS Colloquium Series handout, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Pustejovsky, J., 2000b, “Events and the semantics of opposition,” pp. 445-482 in Events as Grammatical Objects, C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky, eds., Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav, M. and Levin, B., 1998, “Building verb meanings,” pp. 97-134 in The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Butt and Geuder, eds., CSLI Lecture Notes No. 83, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandiway Fong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fong, S. Semantic Opposition and WordNet. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13, 159–171 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JLLI.0000024732.19671.bc

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JLLI.0000024732.19671.bc

Navigation