Abstract
Does neo-Rawlsian political philosophy offer an adequate account of the social conditions of capitalism? In this paper, I present two arguments for thinking that it does not. First, I develop a historicist critique of liberal egalitarianism, arguing that it provides a vision of social reality that is intimately connected to the historical and ideological constellation that I call postwar liberalism, and as such cannot account for social reality since the neoliberal revolutions of the late twentieth century. Second, I explore arguments in Marxist and critical social theory that cast liberal egalitarianism as partial, on account of its inadequate portrait of capitalist society. In surveying responses to these critiques, I argue that merely extending liberal egalitarianism into new domains to account for how contemporary circumstances have changed since the mid-twentieth century cannot address the problem of its partial view of the social world. Taking seriously the insights of critical social theory and the study of capitalism should lead to a challenge to liberal egalitarianism, not an extension of it.
References
Adkins, L., M. Cooper, and M. Konigs. 2020. The Asset Economy. London: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Arnold, S. 2020. “No Community without Socialism: Why Liberal Egalitarianism is Not Enough.” Philosophical Topics 48 (2): 1–21 https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics202048213 .Search in Google Scholar
Battistoni, A. 2020. “Review.” In H-Diplo Roundtable XXI-24 on In the Shadow of Justice. https://networks.h-net.org/node/28443/discussions/5704868/h-diplo-roundtable-xxi-24-shadow-justice-postwar-liberalism-and#_Toc29596366.Search in Google Scholar
Beitz, C. 1971. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.10.14452/MR-026-03-1974-07_1Search in Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 2006. The Economics of Global Turbulence. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Brick, H. 2006. Transcending Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Callison, W., and Z. Manfredi. 2019. Mutant Neoliberalism: Market Rule and Political Rupture. New York: Fordham University Press.10.5422/fordham/9780823285716.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Canaday, M. 2009. The Straight State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830428Search in Google Scholar
Chamayou, G. 2021. The Ungovernable Society. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. 2004. “Learning from the Outsider within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” In The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader, edited by S. Harding. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, M. 2017. Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1qft0n6Search in Google Scholar
Cordelli, C. 2020. The Privatized State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691205755.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Cordelli, C., and J. Levy. 2021. “The Ethics of Global Capital Mobility.” American Political Science Review 116 (2): 439–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000964.Search in Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2021. “Will the Gig Economy Prevail? (London, 2019).” In Work without the Worker, edited by P. Jones. London: Polity.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, M. 1986. Prisoners of the American Dream: Politics and the Economy in the History of the US Working Class. New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Duran, C. 2017. Fictitious Capital: How Finance is Appropriating our Future. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Edmundson, W. 2017. John Rawls: Reticent Socialist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316779934Search in Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B., and J. Ehrenreich. 1977. "The Professional-Managerial Class." Radical America 11 (2): 7–32.Search in Google Scholar
Fine, S., and L. Ypi. 2016. Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Finlayson, L. 2015. The Political is Political: Conformity and the Illusion of Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Finlayson, L. 2017. “With Radicals like these, who Needs Conservatives? Doom, Gloom, and Realism in Political Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory 16 (3): 264–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885114568815.Search in Google Scholar
Forrester, K. 2019a. The Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691189420Search in Google Scholar
Forrester, K. 2019b. “History, Reparations, and the Origins of Global Justice.” In Empire, Race, and Global Justice, edited by D. Bell, 22–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108576307.002Search in Google Scholar
Forrester, K. 2022. “The History of Liberal Political Philosophy Revisited.” Review of Politics (forthcoming).Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2010. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Picador.Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, N. 2016. “Contradictions of Capital and Care.” New Left Review 100: 99–117.Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, N., and R. Jaeggi. 2018. Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Frega, R., L. Herzog, and C. Neuhäuser. 2019. “Workplace Democracy—The Recent Debate.” Philosophy Compass 14 (4): e12574. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12574.Search in Google Scholar
Gardiner, J. 1976. “The Political Economy of Domestic Labour in Capitalist Societies.” In Dependence and Exploitation in Work and Marriage, edited by D. Leonard, S. Allen, and D. L. Barker, 109–20. London: Longman Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Geuss, R. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835515Search in Google Scholar
Gilabert, P., and M. O’Neill. 2019. “Socialism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socialism/ (accessed 08/10/2022).Search in Google Scholar
Gilmore, R. W. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 1980. Farewell to the Working Class. London: Pluto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hinton, E. 2016. From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674969223Search in Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817298Search in Google Scholar
Hartsock, N. 2004. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” In The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader, edited by S. Harding. New York: Routledge.10.1007/0-306-48017-4_15Search in Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is Strong Objectivity?” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff, and E. Potter. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 2007. “‘But Mom, Crop-Tops Are Cute!’ Social Knowledge, Social Structure and Ideology Critique.” Philosophical Issues 17: 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2007.00123.x.Search in Google Scholar
Jameson, F. 1989. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, P. 2021. Work without the Worker: Labour in the Age of Platform Capitalism. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Katznelson, I. 2005. When Affirmative Action Was White. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Kessler-Harris, A. 2001. Pursuit of Equity: Women, Men, and the Quest for Economic Citizenship in 20th Century America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Klein, J. 2003. For All These Rights: Business, Labor, and the Shaping of America’s Public-Private Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kornhauser, A. 2018. Debating the American State: Liberal Anxieties and the New Leviathan 1930–1970. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, J. 2022. The Meddlers: Sovereignty, Empire, and the Birth of Global Economic Governance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674275768Search in Google Scholar
McKeown, M. 2022. “The View from below: How the Neoliberal Academy is Shaping Contemporary Political Theory.” Society 59 (2): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-022-00705-z.Search in Google Scholar
McKean, B. 2020. Disorienting Neoliberalism: Global Justice and the Outer Limit of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190087807.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mies, M., V. Bennholdt-Thomsen, and C. Von Werlhof. 1988. Women: The Last Colony. London: Zed Books.Search in Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. 1998. Blackness Visible: Essays on Philosophy and Race. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. 1999. The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. 2005. “Ideal Theory’ as Ideology.” Hypatia 20 (3): 165–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/hyp.2005.0107.Search in Google Scholar
Moyn, S. 2018. Not Enough. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674984806Search in Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, M. 2008. “Three Rawlsian Routes towards Economic Democracy.” Revue de Philosophie Economique 9 (1): 29–55.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, M., and T. Williamson. 2012. “Introduction.” In Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond, edited by M. O’Neill, and T. Williamson, 1–14. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444355192.chSearch in Google Scholar
O’Neill, M. 2020. “Social Justice and Economic Systems: On Rawls, Democratic Socialism, and Alternatives to Capitalism.” Philosophical Topics 48 (2): 159–201.10.5840/philtopics202048219Search in Google Scholar
O’Shea, T. 2020. “What Is Economic Liberty?” Philosophical Topics 48 (2): 203–22.10.5840/philtopics202048220Search in Google Scholar
Pineda, E. 2021. Seeing like an Activist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197526422.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Plehwe, D., S. Quinn, and P. Mirowski. 2020. Nine Lives of Neoliberalism. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1966–67. “Lecture 1: Nature and Limits of Political Philosophy 1966.” In Philosophy 171, Lectures I-IV, 1a. Papers of John Rawls HUM 48. Harvard University Archives.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042605Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2006. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, W. 2021. “Do We Live in a Society.” Polity 53: 576–7. https://doi.org/10.1086/716207.Search in Google Scholar
Rodgers, D. T. 2011. Age of Fracture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674059528Search in Google Scholar
Rose, J. 2016. Free Time. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691163451.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Schweickart, D. 2002. After Capitalism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, T. 2017. Beyond Liberal Egalitarianism: Marx and Normative Social Theory. Chicago: Brill.10.1163/9789004352292Search in Google Scholar
Smith, S. 2021. “Historicizing Rawls.” Modern Intellectual History 18: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147924432000044x.Search in Google Scholar
Slobodian, Q. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674919808Search in Google Scholar
Stanczyk, L. 2012. “Productive Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 40: 144–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2012.01212.x.Search in Google Scholar
Terry, B. M. 2021. “Conscription and the Color Line: Rawls, Race, and Vietnam.” Modern Intellectual History 18 (4): 960–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479244320000463.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, A. 2016. Republic of Equals: Predistribution and Property-Owning Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190602116.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Winant, G. 2021. The Next Shift: The Fall of Industry and the Rise of Health Care in Rust Belt America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674259836Search in Google Scholar
Wollner, G. 2020. “Socialist Action.” Philosophical Topics 48 (2): 159–201. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics202048224.Search in Google Scholar
Ypi, L. 2018. “The Politics of Reticent Socialism.” Catalyst 2 (3), https://catalyst-journal.com/2018/12/the-politics-of-reticent-socialism.Search in Google Scholar
Ypi, L. 2020. “Review.” In H-Diplo Roundtable XXI-24 on In the Shadow of Justice. https://networks.h-net.org/node/28443/discussions/5704868/h-diplo-roundtable-xxi-24-shadow-justice-postwar-liberalism-and#_Toc29596366 (accessed 07/01/2022).Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
