Skip to main content
Log in

Preconditions of predication: From qualia to quantum mechanics

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although in every inductive inference, an act of invention is requisite, the act soon slips out of notice. Although we bind together facts by superinducing upon them a new Conception, this Conception, once introduced and applied, is looked upon as inseparably connected with the facts, and necessarily implied in them. Having once had the phenomena bound together in their minds in virtue of the Conception men can no longer easily restore them back to the detached and incoherent condition in which they were before they were thus combined. The pearls once strung, they seem to form a chain by their nature. Induction has given them unity which it is so far from costing us an effort to preserve, that it requires an effort to imagine it dissolved — William Whewell, 1858. (Quoted from Butts (ed.), 1989, p. 143)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, J.: 1964, ‘On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox’, Physics 1.

  • Butts, R. (ed.): 1989, William Whewell: Theory of Scientific Method, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis/Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, A.: 1976, ‘Leibniz's principle of the identity of indiscernibles: a false principle’, Philosophy of Science 43, 491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. C. W.: 1984, ‘Particles do not exist’, in S. Christensen (ed.), Quantum Theory of Gravity.

  • Forster, M. R.: 1986, ‘Bell's paradox and path analysis’, in P. Weingartner and G. Dorn (eds.), Foundations of Physics, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1965, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, 2nd edition. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.

  • Hoffman, D.: 1983, ‘The interpretation of visual illusions’, Scientific American 249, 154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyprianidis, Sardelis, and Vigier: 1984, ‘Causal non-local character of quantum statistics’, Physics Letters 100A, 228–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyprianidis, Roy and Vigier: 1987, ‘Distinguishability or indistinguishability in classical and quantum statistics’, Physics Letters 119A, 333–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D.: 1982, Vision, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S.: 1979, The Interpretation of Visual Motion, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forster, M. Preconditions of predication: From qualia to quantum mechanics. Topoi 10, 13–26 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136019

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136019

Keywords

Navigation