Conclusion
By using the concept of a uniformity, the Structuralists have given us a most useful means of representing approximations. In the second section of this paper, I have made use of this technique to show how we can deal with errors of measurement — imprecise explananda — in the context of theoretical explanation. As well as (I hope) providing further demonstration of the power of the Structuralist approach, this also serves to support the ontic conception of explanation by showing that it can help us resolve substantial problems in the theory of explanation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balzer, W.: 1981, ‘Sneed's Theory Concept and Vagueness’, in A.Hartkamper and H-JSchmidt (eds.),Structure and Approximation in Physical Theories, Plenum, New York.
Balzer, W.: 1983, ‘Theory and Measurement’,Erkenntnis 19, 3–25.
Balzer, W., C. U. Moulines and J. D. Sneed, An Architectonic for Science. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Forge, J. C.: 1980, ‘The Structure of Physical Explanation’,Philosophy of Science 47, 203–226.
Forge, J. C.: 1980, ‘Theoretical Explanation in Physical Science’,Erkenntnis 23, 269–294.
Forge, J. C.: 1986, ‘The Instance Theory of Explanation’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, 127–142.
Forge, J. C.: 1987, ‘On Ellis' Theory of Quantities’, in JohnForge (ed.),Measurement, Realism and Objectivity, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Forge, J. C.: 1989, ‘New Directions in the Theory of Explanation’,Metascience 7, 78–89.
Moulines, C. U.: 1976, ‘Approximate Application of Empirical Theory: A General Explication’,Erkenntnis 10, 210–227.
Salmon, W. C.: 1984,Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Sneed, J. D.: 1979,The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank Professor C. U. Moulines for his kindness in reading an earlier draft of this paper, and in particular for suggesting to me to mention the points made in footnotes 12 and 13. I am also most grateful to this journal's referee for many helpful comments whereby the paper has been much improved.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forge, J. Theoretical explanation and errors of measurement. Erkenntnis 33, 371–390 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717592
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717592