Skip to main content
Log in

Pre-Persons, Commodities or Cyborgs: The Legal Construction and Representation of the Embryo

  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores how embryos have been representedin law. It argues that two main models haveunderpinned legal discourse concerning the embryo. Onediscourse, which has become increasingly prevalent,views embryos as legal subjects or persons. Suchrepresentations are facilitated by technologicaldevelopments such as ultrasound imaging. In additionto influencing Parliamentary debate prior to thepassage of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act1990, images of embryos as persons featureprominently in popular culture, including advertisingand films, and this discourse came to the fore in the`orphaned embryo' debate in 1996. The main opposingdiscourse dismisses embryos as commodifiable objects,which fits with a trend towards legal recognition thatreproductive materials such as sperm may be classifiedas property which may be donated or sold. In thecase of cryo-preserved embryos these competingperspectives have resulted in litigation over thestatus of frozen embryos. In this paper I argue thatit might be productive to shift the debate from thispolarised dispute over whether embryos matter or not,whether they are pre-persons or commodities. Instead,I suggest that we should attempt to locate them in abiotechnological milieu, where cyborg metaphors may beutilised, and questions of how we should treat embryoswould be contextualised alongside our response toother cyborgs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balsamo, A. (1999) Reading Cyborgs, Writing Feminism. In J. Wolmark (Ed.), Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman Novaes, S. and Salem, T. (1998) Embedding the Embryo. In J. Harris and S. Holm (Eds), the Future of Human Reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazier, M. (1999a) Can You Buy Children? Child and Family Law Quarterly 11, 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazier, M. (1999b) Regulating the Reproduction Business? Medical Law Review 7, 166–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, 1993.

  • Campbell, R. and Porter, S. (1997) Feminist Theory and the Sociology of Childboirth: A Response to Ellen Annadale and Judith Clark. Sociology of Health and Illness 19, 238–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri, P. and Singer, P. (1993), The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condit, D.M. (1995) Fetal Personhood: Political Identity Under Construction. In P. Boling (Ed.), Expecting Trouble: Surrogacy, Fetal Abuse & New Reproductive Technologies (pp. 25–54). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corea, G. (1984) Egg Snatchers. In R. Arditti et al. (Eds), Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? (pp. 37–51). London: Pandora Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Floyd, R. and Dumit, J. (1998) Cyborg Babies: Children of the Third Millenium. In R. Davis Floyd and J. Dumit (Eds), Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots (pp. 67–89). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. (1990) Protecting the Cryopreserved Human Embryo Tennessee Law Review 57, 507–537 at 519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, D. (1997) Property, Women and Politics. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, M. (unpub) Technology, Representation and the Feminine: Science Fictions (cited in Balsamo, 1999: 148).

  • Dyson, A. and Harris, J. (Eds) (1990) Experiments on Embryos. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fovargue, S. (1998) Case-Note. Journal of Family and Social Welfare Law 20 427–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fovargue, S. and Miola, J. (1998) Policing Pregnancy: Implications of the Attorney-General's Reference (No 3 of 1994). Medical Law Review 6, 265–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. and McHale, J. (forthcoming 2000) Framing the Clinical Body: The Legal Regulation of Body Parts and Products. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francione, G. (1995) Animals, Property, and the Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. (1993) Making Representations: The Parliamentary Debate on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. In J. Edwards et al. (Eds), Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, D. (1996) Introduction. In Human, All Too Human. New York: Routledge, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hables Gray, C. (Ed.) (1995) The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1998) Clones, Genes and Immortality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1985) A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s, Reprinted. In L.J. Nicolson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (pp. 190–233). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997) Modest-Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartouni, V. (1997) Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and Human Genetics Advisory Commission (1998) Cloning Issues in Reproduction, Science and Medicine. BMA Discussion Paper, October 1999.

  • Hyde A. (1997) Bodies of Law. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, I. (1987) The Moral Status of the Embryo. In Treat Me Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, M. (1998) Regulating the New Reproductive Technologies: A Cross-Channel Comparison. Medical Law International 3, 89–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, M. (1998) The French Parliamentary Guidelines of May 1997: Clarification or Fudge? Medical Law International 3, 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (1986) Law and Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. (1999) Caesareans and Cyborgs. Feminist Legal Studies, 233–249.

  • Litman, M.M. and Robertson, G.B. (1993) Reproductive Technology: Is a Property Law Regime Appropriate? In Research Volumes prepared for the Canadian Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies.

  • Mentor, S. (1998) Witches, Nurses, Midwives and Cyborgs. In R. Davis Floyd and J. Dumit (Eds), Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots (pp. 67–89). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. and Georges, E. (1998) Baby's First Picture: The Cyborg Fetus of Ultrasound Imaging. In Davis Floyd, R. and Dumit, J. (Eds), Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots. Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D. and Lee, R. (1991) Blackstone's Guide to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. London: Blackstone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. (1997) The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T. (1997) Feminism on Flesh. Law and Critique 8, 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedelsky, J. (1993) Property in Potential Life: A Relational Approach to Choosing Legal Categories. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 6, 343–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, N. (1999) Cyberpunk: Preparing the Ground for Revolution or Keeping the Boys Satisifed? In J. Wolmark (Ed.), Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace (pp. 191–207). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, C. (1995) Frozen Embryos and ‘Fathers’ Rights: Parenthood and Decision-Making in the Cryopreservation of Embryos. In J. Callaghan (Ed.), Reproduction, Ethics and the Law (pp. 178–198) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1991) Real-Time Fetus: The Role of the Sonogram in the Age of Monitored Reproduction. In C. Penley and A. Ross (Eds), Technoculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. (1990) In the Beginning: The Legal Status of Early Embryos. Virginia Law Review 76 437–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B.K. (1984) The Meanings of Choice in Reproductive Technology. In R. Arditti et al. (Eds), Test-Tube Women. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, S. (1993) Who is the Mother to Make the Judgment? The Constructions of Women in English Abortion Law. Feminist Legal Studies 1, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, S. (1997) Out of Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. et al. (Eds) (1990) Embryo Experimentation: Ethcial, Legal and Social Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spallone, P. (1989) Beyond Conception: The New Politics of Reproduction. London: Routledge, pp. 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabile, C. (19994) Shooting the Mother: Fetal Photography and the Politics of Disappearance. In Feminism and the Technological Fix. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, D.L. (1991) Adversarial Politics: The Legal Construction of Abortion. In S. Franklin et al. (Eds), Off Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (pp 175–189). London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, D.L. (1997) Bodies in Glass: Genetics, Eugenics, Embryo Ethics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbock, B. (1987) Life Before Birth: The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbock, B. (1998) Sperm as Property. In J. Harris and S. Holm (Eds), The Future of Human Reproduction. (pp. 150–161) Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (1992) Reproducing the Future: Essays on anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, K. (1994) Strict Liability and the Supply of Donated Gametes. Medical Law Review 2, 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1992) The Public Fetus and the Family Car: From Abortion Politics to a Volvo Advertisement. Public Culture 4, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M. (1998) Reproducing Narrative. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. (1990) An Irresolvable Dipsute? In A. Dyson and J. Harris (Eds), Experiments on Embryos (pp. 106–119). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, M. (1984) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, Cmnd. 9314.

  • Watt, H. (1996) Potential and the Early Human. Journal of Medical Ethics 22, 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, L. (1998) Pregnancy Ultrasound in Maternal Discourse. In M. Shildrick and J. Proce (Eds), Vital Signs: Feminist Reconfigurations of the Bio/logical Body (pp. 78–99) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolmark, J. (1999) Introduction: Cybersubjects: Cyborgs and Cyberpunks. In Wolmark (Ed.), Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs and Cyberspace. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, M. Pre-Persons, Commodities or Cyborgs: The Legal Construction and Representation of the Embryo. Health Care Analysis 8, 171–188 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009406729739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009406729739

Navigation