Skip to main content
Log in

Apophasis and the turn of philosophy to religion: From Neoplatonic negative theology to postmodern negation of theology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay represents part of an effort to rewrite the history metaphysics in terms of what philosophy never said, nor could say. It works from the Neoplatonic commentary tradition on Plato’s Parmenides as the matrix for a distinctively apophatic thinking that takes the truth of metaphysical doctrines as something other than anything that can be logically articulated. It focuses on Damascius in the 5–6th century AD as the culmination of this tradition in the ancient world and emphasizes that Neoplatonism represents the crisis of Greek metaphysics on account of the inability to give a rational account of foundations for knowing and of the ultimate principle of beings. Neoplatonism discovered how all such ultimate principles were necessarily beyond the reach of reason and speech. This apophatic insight is drawn out with the help of contemporary criticism of Neoplatonic philosophy, defining also some points of divergence. The essay then discusses the motives for thinking the unsayable in postmodern times on the basis of this parallel with Neoplatonic thought. Discourse’s becoming critical of itself to the point of self-subversion animates them both. However, the tendency in postmodern thought to totally reject theology, including negative theology, is a betrayal of its own deepest motivations. This tendency is debated through an examination of the thought of Jean-Luc Nancy. While any traditional discourse can be negated, the negating and self-negating capacity of discourse itself is infinite, and this is where a perennial negative theological philosophy of the unsayable is to be located. Language, eminently the language of philosophy, as infinitely open, points in a direction which becomes equally and ineluctably theological.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (2002). Idea Bella prosa. Macerata: Quodlibet, pp. 9–12.

  • Armstrong, A. H. (1979). Plotinus’s doctrine of the infinite and its significance for christian thought. In Plotinian and christian studies, vol. 47. London: Varoriurn Reprints.

  • Armstrong, A. H. (1979). Negative theology. In Plotinian and christian studies, p. XXIV: 178.

  • Armstrong, A. H. (1979). The escape of the one: An investigation of some possibilities of apophatic theology imperfectly realised in the West. In Plotinian and christian studies, p. XXIIII: 87.

  • Aubenque, P. (1971). Plotin et le dépassement de l’ontologie grecque classique. In P. Maxime Schuhl & P. Hadot (Eds.), Le Néopolatonisme, Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

  • Benjamin, W. (1977) Über die Sprache überhaupt and über die Sprache des Menschen (1916). In Gesammelte Schriften. II, I (pp. 140–157). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, translated by Jephcott, E. (1978). On language as such and on the language of man. In Reflections: essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings (pp. 314–332). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  • Blanchot, M. (1969). Comment découvrir l’obscur? In L’Entretien infini. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 57–69, translated by Hanson, S. (1993). How to discover the obscure? In The infinite conversation (pp. 40–48). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Blanchot M. (1969). L ’Entretien infini. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulhof I.N., Laurens ten Kate ed. (2000). Flight of the Gods: Philosophical perspectives on negative theology. Fordham University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo J.D., Scanlon M.J., Dooley M. ed. (2001). Questioning God. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo J.D., Scanlon M.J. ed. (1999) God, the gift, and postmodernism. Indiana University Press, Bloomingtonp. 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson T.A. (1999) Indiscretion: Finitude and the naming of God. University of Chicago Press, Chicago pp. 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Combés, J. (1996). La théologie aporétique de Damascius. In Études néoplatoniciennes, 2nd ed. rev., Grenoble: Jérome Millon Connor, P. (1991). Of divine places, In The inoperative community (pp. 110–125). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Damascius (1966). Traité des Premiers Principes, vol. I: De L’Ineffable et de 1’Un, Leendert Gerrit Westerink (Ed.), translated by Combès, J. vol. I 21 (pp. 8–10) Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

  • Davies, O., & Turner, D. (Eds.) (2002) Silence and the word: Negative theology and incarnation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

  • Derrida, J (1993) Sauf le nom (pp. 15–21, 38–65). Paris: Galilée, translated as “Sauf le nom (Post-Scriptum)” in Derrida, J. (1995), Thomas Dutoit (Ed.), On the name. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Derrida, J., & Spire, A. (2002). Au-delà des apparences. Latresne, Bordeaux: Le Bord de 1’eau, p. 53.

  • Dillon, J. M. (1997). Damascius on the ineffable. In The great tradition: Further studies in the development of platonism and early christianity. London: Variorum Editions.

  • Franke, W. (forthcoming) On what cannot be said. Apophatic Discourses in philosophy, religion, literature, and the arts. Vol. I: Classic Formulations. Vol. II: Modern and Contemporary Transformations. University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Hadot P. (2002). Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Albin Michel, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, J. H. (1991). Plotinus and the Apeiron of Plato’s Parmenides. Thomist, 55, 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hent de Vries (1989). Theologie im Pianissimo: Zur Aktualitcit der Denlguren Adornos and Levinas. Kampen, Netherlands: J.H. Kok. English translation by Hale, G. (forthcoming). Minimal Theologies: Critiques of Secular Reason in Adorno and Levinas. Fordham University Press.

  • Hent de Vries (1999). Philosophy and the turn to religion. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore p. 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz S. (1992). Mystical speech and mystical meaning. In: Katz S. (eds). Mysticism and language. Oxford University Press, New York, p. 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney J.P. (1991). Mystical monotheism. University Press of New England, Hannover, New Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney J.P. (1993). The critical value of negative theology. Harvard Theological Review 86, 439–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas (1967). La Trace de l’Autre and Énigme et phénoméne. In En découvrant 1’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris: Vrin.

  • Milbank J. (1977). The word made strange: theology, language, culture. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy (2000) Corpus. Paris: Métailié.

  • Nancy (2003) Noli me tangere: Essai sur la levée du corps. Bayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy (2005). Déconstruction du christianisme, vol 1. Galilée, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sara Rappe (2000) Reading neoplatonism. Non-discursive thinking in the texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharlemann R.P. ed. (1992). Negation and theology. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells M. (1994). Mystical languages of unsaying. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerell O.F. ed. (1998). The otherness of God. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M.C. (1987) Altarity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M.C. (1990). Tears. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990, p. 106.

  • Trouillard J. (August, 1961). Valeur critique de la mystique Plotinienne. Revue philosophique de Louvain 59, 431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner D. (1995). The darkness of God: Negativity in christian mysticism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 34

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward G. ed. (1997). The postmodern God: A theological reader. Blackwell, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward G. ed. (2001). The Blackwell companion to postmodern theology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J.P. (2000). Denying divinity: Apophasis in the patristic christian and Soto Zen Buddhist traditions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 6.522, translated by C. K. Ogden (1992) with introduction by Bertrand Russell. London: Routledge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Franke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franke, W. Apophasis and the turn of philosophy to religion: From Neoplatonic negative theology to postmodern negation of theology. Int J Philos Relig 60, 61–76 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-0012-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-0012-7

Keywords

Navigation