Abstract
This paper offers a new semantic theory of existentials (sentences of the form There be NP pivot XP coda ) in which pivots are (second order) predicates and codas are modifiers. The theory retains the analysis of pivots as denoting generalized quantifiers (Barwise and Cooper 1981; Keenan 1987), but departs from previous analyses in analyzing codas as contextual modifiers on a par with temporal/locative frame adverbials. Existing analyses universally assume that pivots are arguments of some predicate, and that codas are main or secondary predicates. It is shown that these analyses cannot account for the behavior of codas with quantifiers and for the interaction of multiple codas, both of which receive a simple treatment on the proposed theory. The assimilation of codas to frame adverbials explains several semantic properties which have not been analyzed in the semantic literature, and that distinguish existentials from their copular counterparts. Furthermore, it highlights important properties of the semantics of modification and its relation to predication.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artstein R. (2005) Quantificational arguments in temporal adjunct clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(5): 541–597
Babby L.H. (1980) Existential sentences and negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI, Karoma Publishers
Barker C., Jacobson P. (2007) Direct compositionality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Barwise J., Cooper R. (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219
Bauer W. (1993) Maori. Routledge, London
Beaver, D., Francez, I., & Levinson, D. (2006). Bad subject! (non)-canonicality and NP distribution in existentials. In E. Georgala & J. Howell (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT XV. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Bolinger D. (1967) Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18(1): 1–34
Borschev, V., & Partee, B. (2001). The Russian genitive of negation in existentials sentences: The role of Theme-Rheme structure reconsidered. In E. Hajičová, P. Sgall, J. Hana, & T. Hoskovec (Eds.), Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague (Vol. 4, pp. 185–250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Caponigro, I., & Pearl, L. (2008). Silent prepositions: Evidence from free relatives. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlaèil, B. Gehrke, & R. Nouwen (Eds.), The syntax and semantics of spatial P. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Chierchia G. (1985) Formal semantics and the grammar of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 417–443
Chierchia G. (1992) Anaphora and dynamic binding. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(2): 111–183
Chierchia G. (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405
Chierchia G., Turner R. (1988) Semantics and property theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 11(3): 261–302
Chomsky N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris, Dordrecht
Chung S., Ladusaw W.A. (2004) Restriction and saturation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Condoravdi, C. (2008). Punctual until as a scalar NPI. In The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparksy (pp. 631–655). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Condoravdi C., Gawron J.M. (1996) The context-dependency of implicit arguments. In: Kanazawa M., Piñón C., de Swart H. (eds) Quantifiers, deduction and context. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 1–32
Dayal V. (1998) ANY as inherently modal. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(5): 433–476
de Swart H. (1996) Meaning and use of not until. Journal of Semantics 13(3): 221–263
Declerck, R. (1995). The problem of not . . . until. Linguistics (33), 51–98.
Doron, E. (1983). Verbless predicates in Hebrew. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Dowty D.R. (1979) Word meaning and montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in montague’s PTQ. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Dowty D. (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619
Emonds J. (1976) A transformational approach to English syntax. Academic Press, New York
Erteschik Shir N. (1997) The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Falk, Y. (2004). The Hebrew present-tense copula as a mixed category. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 04 conference, University of Canterbury, (pp. 226–246). On-line: CSLI Publications.
Francez, I. (2007a). Existental propositions. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Francez, I. (2007b). Quantification in the coda of existentials. In M. Aloni, P. Dekker, & F. Roelofsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam colloquium.
Francez N., Steedman M. (2006) Categorial grammar and the semantics of contextual preposition phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(4): 381–417
Freeze R. (1992) Existentials and other locatives. Language 68(3): 553–595
Gendler Szabó Z. (2006) Counting across times. Philosophical Perspectives 20(1): 399–426
Giannakidou, A. (2001). The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2459–735.
Giannakidou A. (2002) UNTIL, aspect, and negation: A novel argument for two untils. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 12: 84–103
Harris S.H. (1994) Factories of death: Japanese biological warfare and the American coverup. Routledge, London
Hazout I. (2004) The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 393–430
Heim I. (1987) Where does the definiteness constraint apply? Evidence from the definiteness of variables. In: Reuland E., ter Meulen A. (eds) The representation of (In)definiteness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 21–42
Heim I. (1991) Atikel und Definiteheit. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Hanbuch der Semantik. de Gruyter, Berlin
Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD thesis, UCLA.
Horn, L. (2000). Any and (-)ever: Free choice and free relatives. In A. Z. Weyner (Ed.), Proceedings of IATL 15 (pp. 71–111).
Jenkins L. (1975) The English existential. Tübingen, Niemeyer
Karttunen, L. (1974). Until. In Papers fromthe 10th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 283–297).
Keenan E. (1987) A semantic definition of indefinite NP. In: Reuland E., ter Meulen A. (eds) The representation of (in)definiteness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 286–317
Keenan E. (2003) The definiteness effect: Semantics or pragmatics?. Natural Language Semantics 11(2): 187–216
Kim, Y. (1997). A situation semantic account of existential sentences. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Kimball J. (1973) The grammar of existence. In: Corum C., Smith-Stark C.T., Weiser A. (eds) Papers from the ninth regional meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago, IL, CLS, pp 262–270
Kuno S. (1971) The position of locatives in existential sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 2(3): 233–278
Kuroda S.Y. (1972) The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185
Lambrecht K. (1994) Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lambrecht K. (2000) When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language 24(3): 611–682
Larson R. (1985) Bare–NP adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 595–621
Larson, R. (2000). Temporal modification in nominals. Handout of paper presented at the International Round Table “The Syntax of Tense and Aspect” Paris, France.
Lumsden M. (1988) Existential sentences: Their structure and meaning. Croom Helm, London
May R. (1985) Logical form. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
McCawley J. (1988) Adverbial NPs: Bare or clad in see–through garb?. Language 64(3): 683–590
McNally L. (1992) An interpretation for the English existential construction. Garland, New York
McNally L. (1998) Existential sentences without existential quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(4): 353–392
Milsark, G. (1974). Existential sentences in English. PhD thesis, MIT.
Milsark G. (1977) Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29
Moro A. (1997) The raising of predicates. Cambridge University Press, New York
Pollard C., Sag I. (1994) Head driven phrase structure grammar. CSLI publications, Stanford
Pratt I., Francez N. (2001) Temporal prepositions and temporal generalized quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(2): 187–222
Rooth, M. (1995). Indefinites, adverbs of quantification, and focus semantics. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 265–299). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Safir, K. (1982). Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect. PhD thesis, MIT.
Sasse H.-J. (1995) “Theticity” and VS order: A case study. Sprachtypologie und Unversalienforschung 48(1): 3–31
Stanley, J., & Gendler Szabó, Z. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. Mind and Language, 15 (2 and 3), 219–261.
Stowell, T. (1978). What was there before there was there. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen, & K.W. Todrys (Eds.), Proceedings of CLS 14 (pp. 458–471).
von Fintel K. (1997) Bare plurals, bare conditionals, and only. Journal of Semantics 14(1): 1–56
von Stechow A. (2002) Temporal prepositional phrases with quantifiers: Some additions to Pratt and Francez (2001). Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5): 755–800
Westerståhl, D. (1984). Determiners and context sets. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Generalized quantifiers in natural language (pp. 45–71). Dordrecht: Floris.
Williams E. (1980) Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238
Williams E. (1984) There-insertion. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 131–153
Zucchi A. (1995) The ingredients of definiteness and the definiteness effect. Natural Language Semantics 3(1): 33–78
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francez, I. Existentials, predication, and modification. Linguist and Philos 32, 1–50 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9055-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9055-4