Skip to main content
Log in

Business Infomediary Representations of Corporate Responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on the recent discussion about the role information intermediaries (infomediaries) play in affecting corporate responsibility (CR) adoption, we analyze the representation of CR issues in a business infomediary distributed by a leading business organization. The explicit task of the business infomediary is to promote a competitive national business environment. This paper contributes to (1) research on CR, by providing new knowledge on the current CR discourse within the business community, and (2) research on infomediaries, by introducing a distinction between watchdog-oriented and business-oriented infomediaries. The findings show that the business infomediary promotes green practices and constructs a national business identity in terms of environmental business when responsible practices are voluntary. We argue that as business-oriented infomediaries shape the meaning of CR according to their own interests, signifiers that refer to the positive contributions of business become preferred in the articles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The subsequent word count of the exact term (including all the times “CSR” or “CR” is mentioned and also considering how often it is mentioned within each article) revealed that “corporate social responsibility” [yhteiskuntavastuu] is mentioned only three times (once per article in Prima, June 10, 2010, p. 48; Prima, October 11, 2012, p. 24; Prima, June 13, 2013, p. 42). One article was coded with the representative word “CSR,” as it covered best what is discussed in the article, while in the two other cases, the terms “sustainability” and “transparency” represented the content of the articles better. In addition, two articles mention “corporations’ responsibility,” one article mentions a specific “corporation’s responsibility,” and one article mentions “social responsibility.”

References

  • Barkemeyer, R., Figge, F., Holt, D., & Hahn, T. (2009). What the papers say: Trends in sustainability. A comparative analysis of 115 leading national newspapers worldwide. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 33, 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkemeyer, R., Holt, D., Figge, F., & Napolitano, G. (2010). A longitudinal and contextual analysis of media representation of business ethics. European Business Review, 22(4), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, D. F., Sauerbronn, J. F. R., & Mello da Costa, A. (2014). Corporate sustainability discourses in a Brazilian business magazine. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhr, H., & Grafström, M. (2007). The making of meaning in the media: The case of corporate social responsibility in the financial times. In F. Den Hond & P. Neergaard (Eds.), Managing corporate social responsibility in action: Talking, doing and measuring (pp. 15–32). Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ChernovG, J. L., & Tsetsura, K. (2012). Building a bridge between corporate reputation and corporate social responsibility in the Ukrainian print media. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 7(2), 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confederation of Finnish industries. (2014). Confederation of Finnish Industries. Accessed June 2, 2015, from http://www.ek.fi/ek/en/index.php.

  • De Geer, H., Borglund, T., & Frostenson, M. (2009). Reconciling CSR with the role of the corporation in welfare states: The problematic Swedish example. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, D. (2007). Yesterday’s papers and today’s technology. Digital newspaper archives and ‘push button’ content analysis. European Journal of Communication, 22(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, D., Pickering, M., Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (1999). Researching communications. A practical guide to methods in media and cultural analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2009). Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the infomediary process. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubbink, W., Graafland, J., & van Liedekerke, L. (2008). CSR, transparency and the role of intermediate organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for corporate social responsibility. Accessed October 22, 2014, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF.

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2007). A macromarketing ethics framework: Stakeholder orientation and distributive justice. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(1), 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnwatch. (2011). Risuja ja ruusuja komission tuoreelle yritysvastuulinjaukselle [Bouquets and brickbats for the European Commission’s new CSR definition]. Accessed July 21, 2015, from http://www.finnwatch.org/fi/uutiset/30-risuja-ja-ruusuja-komission-tuoreelle-yritysvastuulinjaukselle.

  • Foucault, M. (1971). The order of things. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankental, P. (2001). Corporate social responsibility—a PR invention? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadian, A., Money, K., & Hillebrand, C. (2015). Corporate responsibility research: Past-present-future. Group and Organization Management, 40(3), 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Hamilton, A. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales-Padron, T. L., & Nason, R. W. (2009). Market responsiveness to societal interests. Journal of Macromarketing, 29(4), 392–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafström, M., & Windell, K. (2011). The role of infomediaries: CSR in the business press during 2000–2009. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthey, E., & Morsing, M. (2014). CSR and the mediated emergence of strategic ambiguity. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(4), 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, R., & Kapelus, P. (2004). Corporate social responsibility in mining in Southern Africa: Fair accountability or just greenwash? Development, 47(3), 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A. (2014). How is sustainability structured? The discursive life of environmentalism. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivonen, K., & Moisander, J. (2014). Rhetorical construction of narcissistic CSR orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juholin, E. (2004). For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 4(3), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junior, R., Best, P. J., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepa. (2014). Temaattiset suositukset. Yritysvastuu [Thematic guidelines. CSR]. Accessed July 21, 2015, from http://www.maailmantaloudentekijat.fi/tiedostot/temaattinen-suositus-yritysvastuu-2014.pdf.

  • Kiousis, S. (2004). Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 US presidential election. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y., & Carroll, C. E. (2011). The emergence, variation, and evolution of corporate social responsibility in the public sphere, 1980–2004: The exposure of firms to public debate. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midttun, A., Gjølberg, M., Kourula, A., Sweet, S., & Vallentin, S. (2015). Public policies for corporate social responsibility in four Nordic countries: Harmony of goals and conflict of means. Business and Society, 54(4), 464–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Employment and the Economy. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Accessed December 2, 2014, from http://www.tem.fi/en/enterprises/corporate_social_responsibility_(csr).

  • Natural Resources Institute Finland. (2015). Natural Resources Institute Finland. Accessed April 19, 2015, from http://www.luke.fi/en/.

  • Nieminen, H., & Pantti, M. (2012). Media markkinoilla. Johdatus joukkoviestintään ja sen tutkimukseen [Media market. Introduction to mass communications and its research] (3rd ed.). Tampere: Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordiska ministerrådet. (2014). Strategi för internationell profilering och positionering av Norden 2015–2018. Accessed July 21, 2015, from http://www.norden.org/is/norraena-radherranefndin/skrifstofa-norraenu-radherranefndarinnar/upplysingasvid-komm/verkefni/strategi-foer-internationell-profilering-och-positionering-av-norden-201520132018.

  • O’Connor, A., & Gronewold, K. L. (2012). Black gold, green earth: An analysis of the petroleum industry’s CSR environmental sustainability discourse. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 318–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantti, M. (2004). Taistelu sydämistä ja mielistä: Stuart Hall ja kulttuurintutkimus [A battle for hearts and minds: Stuart Hall and culture research]. In T. Mörä, I. Salovaara-Moring, & S. Valtonen (Eds.), Mediatutkimuksen vaeltava teoria [Wandering theory of media research] (pp. 230–254). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pippuri, M. (2012). Asiantuntija: Talvivaara on 2000-luvun vakavin ympäristöonnettomuus [Expert: Talvivaara is the most severe environmental accident of the decade]. Accessed January 7, 2015, from: http://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/a1305614058708.

  • Rossi, L. (2010). Esityksiä, edustamista ja eroja: representaatio on politiikkaa [Presentations, representations, and distinctions: Representation is politics]. In T. Knuuttila, A. P. Lehtinen, & S. Valtonen (Eds.), Representaatio. Tiedon kivijalasta tieteiden työkaluksi [Representation. From a knowledge foundation to a tool for sciences] (pp. 261–275). Helsinki: Gaudeam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozanova, J. (2006). Portrayals of corporate social responsibility: A comparative analysis of a Russian and a Canadian newspaper. Journal for East European Management Studies, 11(1), 48–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanoma Magazines. (2013). Elinkeinoelämän Keskusliitto. Accessed May 24, 2013, from http://www.sanomamagazines.fi/yritysjulkaisut/asiakkaamme/ek/.

  • Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer-oriented CSR communication: Focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, F., Castello, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network society: A communication view. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 681–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siltaoja, M., & Onkila, T. (2013). Business in society or business and society: The construction of business-society relations in responsibility reports from a critical discursive perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(4), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R., Freeman, R., & Hockerts, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takala, T., Tanttu, S., Lämsä, A., & Virtanen, A. (2012). Discourses of charisma: Barack Obama’s first 6 months as the President of the USA. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubken, N., & Leibold, I. (2010). Ten rules for successful CSR communication. In M. Pohl & N. Tolhurst (Eds.), Responsible business: How to manage a CSR strategy successfully (pp. 129–142). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tench, R., Bowd, R., & Jones, B. (2007). Perceptions and perspectives: Corporate social responsibility and the media. Journal of Communication Management, 11(4), 348–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Finnish Associaton for Nature Conservation. (2013). Talvivaaran kaivos suljettava [Talvivaara mine must be closed down]. Accessed January 7, 2015, from http://www.sll.fi/ajankohtaista/tiedotteet/2013/talvivaaran-kaivos-suljettava.

  • UPM. (2015). About UPM. Accessed June 2, 2015, from http://www.upm.com/EN/ABOUT-UPM/Pages/default.aspx.

  • van Tulder, R., & van der Zwart, A. (2006). International business-society management. Linking corporate responsibility and globalization. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2011). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of bus. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivarta, V., & Canela, G. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Brazil. The role of the press as watchdog. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2006(21), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2014). Global competitiveness. Accessed October 22, 2014, from http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2014-2015/economies/#economy=FIN.

  • Zhang, J., & Swanson, D. (2006). Analysis of news media’s representation of corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Quarterly, 51(2), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Georgiadis, A. P., Carroll, C. E., & Siegel, D. S. (2012). Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1622–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meri Frig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frig, M., Fougère, M., Liljander, V. et al. Business Infomediary Representations of Corporate Responsibility. J Bus Ethics 151, 337–351 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3200-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3200-0

Keywords

Navigation