Abstract
In recent years, several philosophers have used “situationist” findings in social psychology to criticize character-based ethical theories. After showing how these criticisms apply, prima facie, to Kant’s moral theory, I lay out a Kantian response to them. Kant admits the empirical reality of situation-dependence in human actions but articulates a conception of “ought implies can” that vindicates his character-based moral theory in the face of rarity of character. Moreover, he provides an interpretive framework for the situation-dependence of human motivation in terms of humans’ “propensity to evil.” He also provides a framework for highlighting empirical bases for moral hope, a framework that makes it possible to see lack of character as something human beings can overcome. And he outlines a “moral anthropology” that develops something akin to what Mark Alfano calls “moral technologies,” but in Kant’s case, these technologies focus on cultivating character as such rather than merely good behavioral outcomes.
Alfano, M. 2013. Character as Moral Fiction. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139208536Search in Google Scholar
Allais, L. 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747130.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Allison, H. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139172295Search in Google Scholar
–. 2001. “Ethics, Evil, and Anthropology in Kant: Remarks on Allen Wood’s Kants Ethical Thought”. Ethics 111, 594–613.10.1086/233528Search in Google Scholar
Ameriks, K. 1982. “Recent Work on Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy”. American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 1–24.10.1093/0199247315.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Anderson-Gold, S. 2001. Unnecessary Evil. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2005. “Comments on John Doris’s Lack of Character”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71, 636–42.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00476.xSearch in Google Scholar
Badhwar, N. 2009. “The Milgram Experiments, Learned Helplessness, and Character Traits”. Journal of Ethics 13, 257–89.10.1007/s10892-009-9052-4Search in Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 1987. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 2007. Structures of Agency: Essays. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187717.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Casey, W. M./Burton R. V. 1982. “Training Children to Be Consistently Honest through Verbal Self-Instructions”. Child Development 53, 911–19.10.2307/1129127Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, A. 2009. Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology, and History. New York/London.10.1057/9780230280779Search in Google Scholar
Darley, J. M./Batson, C. D. 1973. “From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27, 100–108.10.1037/h0034449Search in Google Scholar
Doris, J. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139878364Search in Google Scholar
Doris. J./Stich, S. 2005. “As a Matter of Fact: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics”. In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Eds. F. Jackson/M. Smith. Oxford, 114–53.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234769.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Dweck, C. 2000. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. New York.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2006. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Frierson, P. 2018 “Towards a Research Program in Kantian Positive Psychology”. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 71, 89–98.10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.07.005Search in Google Scholar
–. 2014. Kant’s Empirical Psychology. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2013. Kant’s Questions: What is the Human Being? London.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2010a. “Two Standpoints and the Problem of Moral Anthropology”. In Kant’s Moral Metaphysics. Eds. J. Krueger/B. Lipscomb. Berlin, 83–110.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2010b. “Kantian Moral Pessimism”. In Kant’s Anatomy of Evil. Eds. s. Anderson-Gold/P. Muchnik. Cambridge, 33–56.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2007. “Providence and Divine Mercy in Kant’s Ethical Cosmopolitanism”. Faith and Philosophy 24, 143–63.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2006. “Character and Evil in Kant’s Moral Anthropology”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44, 623–34.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2005. “The Moral Importance of Politeness in Kant’s Anthropology”. Kantian Review 9, 105–27.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2003. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Frimer, J. et al. 2011. “The Integration of Agency and Communion in Moral Personality: Evidence of Enlightened Self-Interest”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101, 149–63.10.1037/a0023780Search in Google Scholar
Grenberg, J. 2005. Kant and the Ethics of Humility. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511627859Search in Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P./Bargh, J. (eds.) 1996. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Haney, C. et al. 1973. “Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison”. International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1, 69–97.10.21236/AD0751041Search in Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2000a. Explaining Value and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford.10.1093/0198238045.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000b. “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error”. In Harman 2000a. Oxford, 165–80.10.1093/0198238045.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Isen, A./Levin, P. 1972. “Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21, 384–8.10.1037/h0032317Search in Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. 2003. “Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character”. Ethics 114, 458–91.10.1086/381696Search in Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P. 2014. “Debunking Confabulation: Emotions and the Significance of Empirical Psychology for Kantian Ethics”. In Kant on Emotions and Value. Ed. A. Cohen. Basingstoke, 146–65.10.1057/9781137276650_8Search in Google Scholar
–. 2015 “Consistent Egoists and Situation Managers: two Problems for Situationism”. Philosophical Explorations. Preprint at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2015.1038293.10.1080/13869795.2015.1038293Search in Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1981. The Philosophy of Moral Development. San Francisco.Search in Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L./Candee, D. 1984. “The Relationship of Moral Judgment to Moral Action”. In Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development. Eds. W. M. Kurtines/J. L. Gewirtz. New York, 498–581.Search in Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552795.003.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511554476Search in Google Scholar
Kilham, W./Mann, L. 1974. “Level of Destructive Obedience as a Function of Transmitter and Executant Roles in the Milgram Obedience Paradigm”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 692–702.10.1037/h0036636Search in Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. 2008. “An Aristotelian Critique of Situationism”. Philosophy 83, 55–76.10.1017/S0031819108000302Search in Google Scholar
Kupperman, J. 2001. “The Indispensability of Character”. Philosophy 76, 239–50.10.1017/S0031819101000250Search in Google Scholar
Mariña, J. 1997. “Kant on Grace: A Reply to his Critics”. Religious Studies 33, 379–400.10.1017/S0034412597004046Search in Google Scholar
Mazar, N./Amir, O. /Ariely, D. 2008. “The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance”. Journal of Marketing Research 45, 633–44.10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633Search in Google Scholar
McCarty, R. 2009. Kant’s Theory of Action. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567720.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Merritt, M./Doris, J./Harman, G. 2010. “Character”. In Moral Psychology Handbook. Eds. J. Doris and the Moral Psychology Research Group. Oxford, 355–401.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
Michaelson Jr, G. E. 1990. Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511554728Search in Google Scholar
Milgram, S. 1963. “Behavioral Study of Obedience”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67, 371–8.10.1037/h0040525Search in Google Scholar
–. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, C. 2013. Moral Character: An Empirical Theory. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674350.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 2014. Character and Moral Psychology. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674367.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Moran, K. 2012. Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington, D.C.10.2307/j.ctt284v4fSearch in Google Scholar
Munzel, G. F. 2012. Kant’s Conception of Pedagogy: Toward Education for Freedom. Evanston, IL.10.2307/j.ctv4cbg7kSearch in Google Scholar
–. 1999. Kant’s Conception of Moral Character: The “Critical” Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. 2000. “Two Standpoints and the Belief in Freedom”. The Journal of Philosophy 157, 564–76.10.2307/2678468Search in Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E./Wilson, T. D. 1977. “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes”. In Psychological Review 84, 231–59.10.4324/9780203496398-13Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139173773Search in Google Scholar
Pasternak, L. 2013. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. London.10.4324/9781315874302Search in Google Scholar
Peterson, C. 2006. A Primer in Positive Psychology. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts. R./Wood, W. J. 2007. Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283675.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Sabini, J./Silver, M. 2005. “Lack of Character? Situationism Critiqued”. Ethics 115, 535–62.10.1086/428459Search in Google Scholar
Sarkissian, H. 2010. “Minor Tweaks, Major Payoffs: The Problems and Promise of Situationism in Moral Philosophy”. Philosopher’s Imprint 10, 1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Shu, L./Gino, F./Bazerman, M. 2011. “Dishonest Deed, Clear Conscience: When Cheating Leads to Moral Disengagement and Motivated Forgetting”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 330–49.10.1177/0146167211398138Search in Google Scholar
Steele, C./Aronson, J. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and Intellectual Test Performance of African-Americans”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 797–811.10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797Search in Google Scholar
Swanton, C. 2003. Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. Oxford.10.1093/0199253889.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Upton, C. L. 2009a. “Virtue Ethics and Moral Psychology: The Situationism Debate”. Journal of Ethics 13, 103–15.10.1007/s10892-009-9054-2Search in Google Scholar
Vranas, P. 2005. “The Indeterminacy Paradox: Character Evaluations and Human Psychology”. Noûs 39, 1–42.10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00492.xSearch in Google Scholar
Watkins, E. 2006. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511614217Search in Google Scholar
Webber, J. 2006. “Virtue, Character and Situation”. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3, 193–213.10.1177/1740468106065492Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, T. 1998. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Wood, A. 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139173254Search in Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. 2007. The Lucifer Effect. New York.10.1002/9780470672532.wbepp149Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
