References
Barth, E.M., ‘Philosophy of Religion and the Reality of Models for Modalities’,Erkenntnis 9 (1975), pp. 393–399.
Carnap, Rudolf,Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1947, 1956).
Church, Alonzo,Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1956.
Davidson, Donald and Gilbert Harman (eds.),The Logic of Grammar, Dickenson Publishing Co., Encino, California, 1975.
Descartes, René,Meditations on First Philosophy inDescartes Selections, R.M. Eaton (ed.), Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1927.
Donnellan, Keith, ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’ (1966) in Schwartz (1977).
Frege, Gottlob,The Foundations of Arithmetic, translated by J.L. Austin, Harper's, New York, 1950 (original 1884).
Friedman, Joel I., ‘Was Spinoza Fooled by the Ontological Argument?’, to appear inPhilosophia, 1980.
Friedman, Joel I., ‘The Mystic's Ontological Argument’,American Philosophical Quarterly,16 (1979), pp. 73–78.
Friedman, Joel I., ‘Carnapian Analyticity and Kripkean Necessity’, to appear.
Friedman, Joel I., ‘Bare Kripkean Necessity’ (1980), to appear.
Hartshorne, Charles,The Logic of Perfection, Open Court, LaSalle, 1962.
Hubbeling, H.G., ‘The Meaningfulness of Metaphysics within Certain Systems’,Erkenntnis 9 (1975), pp. 401–409.
Hubbeling, H.G.,Language, Logic, and Criterion: A Defense of non-Positivistic Logical Empiricism, Born N.V. Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1971.
Hughes G.E. and M.J. Cresswell,An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen and Co., London, 1968.
Jarrett, Charles, ‘Spinoza's Ontological Argument’,Canad. Journ. of Philosophy,6 (1976), pp. 685–692.
Kripke, Saul A., ‘A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic’,JSL,24 (1959), pp. 1–15.
Kripke, Saul A., ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’ (1963), in Linsky (1971), pp. 63–72.
Kripke, Saul A., ‘Naming and Necessity’ (1970 lectures), in Davidson and Harman (1972), pp. 253–355.
Kripke, Saul A., ‘Identity and Necessity’ (1971), in Schwartz (1977), pp. 66–101.
Leibniz, Gottfried W.,New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, translated by A.G. Langley, Open Court, Chicago 1916.
Lewis, Clarence I.,A Survey of Symbolic Logic, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1918.
Linsky, Leonard (ed.),Reference and Modality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971.
Malcolm, Norman, ‘Anselm's Ontological Arguments’ (1960), in Plantinga (1965), pp. 136–159.
Matson, Wallace, ‘Steps Toward Spinozism’, delivered before the UC, Davis Tercentenary Spinoza Symposium, March 1977.
Plantinga, Alvin, (ed.),The Ontological Argument, Doubleday-Anchor, Garden City, N.Y., 1965.
Plantinga, Alvin,The Nature of Necessity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974.
Plantinga, Alvin, ‘De Dicto et De Re’ (1969), inNecessary Truth, R.C. Sleigh Jr. (ed.), Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1972, pp. 152–172.
Russell, Betrand, ‘On Denoting’,Mind 14 (1905).
Russell, Bertrand, ‘Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types’ (1908), inLogic and Knowledge, R.C. Marsh (ed.), George Allen and Unwin, London, 1956.
Schwartz, Stephen P. (ed.),Naming, Necessity, and Natural Kinds, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1977.
Smith, T.V. and Marjorie Grene,From Descartes to Locke, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1940.
Spinoza, Benedict,Ethics, J. Gutmann (ed.), Hafner Publishing Co., New York, 1949. (Also see Everyman's Library edition, with an introduction by G. Santayana, 1910).
Spinoza, Benedict,Opera Posthuma, C. Gebhardt (ed.), Carl Winter, Heidelberg, 1925.
St. Anselm,Proslogion, reprinted in part in Plantinga (1965).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedman, J.I. Necessity and the Ontological Argument. Erkenntnis 15, 301–331 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02070841
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02070841