Skip to main content
Log in

Return to Hegel

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that Hegel read Lacan. Put less paradoxically, it claims that situating Hegel within a Lacanian paradigm results in an understanding of the future as still open and of history as not ended. Absolute knowing, on this model, is the recognition of the way in which history has developed, not a claim that it can advance no further. The article aims to persuade those who might otherwise dismiss Hegel – for example, persons au courant with poststructuralism – that he still can make a decisive contribution to current debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fritzman, J. Return to Hegel. Continental Philosophy Review 34, 287–320 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012021606455

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012021606455

Keywords

Navigation