Abstract
The primary instrument of dispute management in political liberalism is a form of political thinking and talking that tries to reconcile opposed positions with an impartial settlement based on fair arrangements and mutual respect, one that is careful to treat rival views equitably, and reasoned through from start to finish with open methods that lead to a public justification understandable to the disputants. But this model of reasoning is notoriously deficient in resolving disputes among radically different communities. A more effective form of political reasoning for these disputes that yet respects the background values of liberalism is found in the languages of state depicted in realist accounts of international relations. These languages avoid liberal appeals to be reasonable, reciprocity controlled by moral criteria, and the quest for common reasons. They represent a deliberative search for an accord that will meet the interests of the disputing parties as they define these interests and understand the settlements, and in this sense are welcome models to manage divisive issues in pluralist democracies. A complete version of political reasoning would contain both liberal and realpolitik models and a mechanism to adjudicate the appropriate uses of each model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, B., Why Dialogue? Journal of Philosophy 86(1) (1989), pp. 5–22.
Atiyah, P.S., The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.
Bird, C., Mutual Respect and Neutral Justification, Ethics 107(1) (1996), pp. 62–96.
Bissette, J., The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Bohman, J., Public Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, 2000.
Bohman, J., and Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.
Campos, P.F., Secular Fundamentalism, Columbia Law Review 94 (1994), pp. 1814–1827.
Carr, E.H., The Twenty Years' Crisis: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan, 1946.
Cohen, J., An Epistemic Conception of Democracy, Ethics 97 (1986), pp. 26–38.
Cohen, J., Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy, in A. Hamlin and Philip Pettit (eds.), The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Oxford: Blackwells, 1989.
Davenport, D., The New Diplomacy, Policy Review 116 (2002/2003), pp. 17–30.
De Magalhÿes, J.C., The Pure Concept of Diplomacy, (Trans. B.F. Pereira). New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.
Dewey, J., How We Think, Toronto, Canada: Dover Publications, 1997.
Doty, R.L., Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
Doyle, M.W., Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York: Norton, 1997.
Duffy, G., Frederking, B.K., and Tucker, S., Language Games: Dialogical Analysis of INF Negotiations, International Studies 42 (1998), pp. 271–294.
Dunn, D.H. (ed.), Diplomacy at the Highest Level: The Evolution of International Summitry. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996.
Dworkin, R., The Original Position, in Norman Daniels (ed.), Reading Rawls. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.
Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Estlund, D., Who's Afraid of Deliberative Democracy? Texas Law Review 71 (1993), pp. 1437–1477.
Estlund, D., The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth, Ethics 108(2) (1998), pp. 252–275.
Fierke, K., Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations, International Studies. 46 (2000), pp. 331–354.
Fish, S., Mission Impossible: Settling the Just Bounds Between Church and State, Columbia Law Review 97(8) (1997), pp. 2255–2333.
Fish, S., Mutual Respect as a Device of Exclusion, in S. Macedo, Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Fish, S., The Trouble with Principles. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Fishkin, J., Democracy and Deliberation. New Haven: Yale, 1991.
Flathman, R., It all Depends ... On How One Understands Liberalism, Political Theory 26(1) (1998), pp. 81–84.
Freeman, S., Reason and Agreement in Social Contract Views, Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(2) (1990), pp. 122–157.
Freeman, S., Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment, Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (2000), pp. 371–418.
Frohock, F., Sacred Texts, Religion 33 (2003), pp. 1–21.
Gray, J., Two Faces of Liberalism. New York: The New Press, 2000.
Grice, H.P., Logic and Conversation, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D., Moral Conflict and Political Consensus, Ethics 101 (1990a), pp. 64–88.
Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D., Moral Conflict and Political Consensus, in R. B. Douglass, G.R. Mara and H.S. Richardson (eds.), In Liberalism and the Good. New York: Routledge, 1990b.
Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D., Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1998.
Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D., Reply to the Critics, in S. Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Guzzini, S., Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
Hartman, F.H., Germany Between East and West. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1965.
Hayek, F.A., The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Hermann, M., and Hermann, C., Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry, International Studies Quarterly. 33 (1989), pp. 361– 387.
Holton, G., Werner Heisenberg and Albert Einstein, Paper presented at the Symposium, Creating Copenhagen. Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 27 March 2000.
Johnson, J., Is Talk Really Cheap? Prompting Conversation Between Critical Theory and Rational Choice, American Political Science Review 87(1) (1993), pp. 74–86.
Johnson, J., Arguing for Deliberation: Some Skeptical Considerations, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Johnson, J., and Knight, J., Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy, Political Theory 22 (1994), pp. 277–296.
Keohane, R.O., Neorealism and its Critics: The Political Economy of International Change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
King, M.L., Letter from Birmingham Jail, in J.S. Bass, Blessed Are the Peacemakers: Martin Luther King, Jr., Eight White Religious Leaders, and the Letter from the Birmingham Jail, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001.
Kissinger, H., Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994.
Kornbluh, P., The Pinochet Files. New York: New Press, 2003.
Kratochwil, F., The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-realism and the Science of Realpolitik Without Politics, Review of International Studies 19(1) (1993), pp. 63–80.
Kratochwil, F., and Slavik, H., The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-realism and the Science of Realpolitik Without Politics, Review of International Studies 19(1) (2002), pp. 63–80.
Lakatos, I., Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in Imre Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Lakoff, G., Moral Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Larmore, C., The Morals of Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Lyotard, J.F., The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. (trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Macedo, S., Transformative Constitutionalism and the Case of Religion: Defending the Moderate Hegemony of Liberalism, Political Theory 26(1) (1998), pp. 56–80.
Macedo, S., Reply to Flathman, Political Theory 26(1) (1998), pp. 85–89.
Macedo, S., Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Macedo, S., Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Macpherson, C.B., The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.
Mark, L., Diplomacy by Other Means, Foreign Policy 132 (2002), pp. 48–56.
Mill, J.S., On Liberty. New York: Norton, 1975.
Mitchell, G.J., Making Peace. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001.
Morgenthau, H., Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf, 1948.
Nagel, T., Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy, Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (1987), pp. 215–240.
Neal, P., Vulgar Liberalism, Political Theory 21(4) (1993), pp. 623–642.
Nicolson, H., Diplomacy. (Revision of 1939 edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1951.
Nietzsche, F., The Genealogy of Morals. (Trans. W. Kaufmann). New York: Vintage Books, 1989.
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
O'Hear, A., Karl Popper. New York: Routledge Kegan & Paul, 1992.
Onuf, N., World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989.
Owen, J.J., Religion and the Demise of Liberal Rationalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Peirce, C., The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings 1893–1913. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press, 1998.
Popper, K., The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.
Popper, K., Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Posner, R., Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993, 1996 (paper edition).
Rawls, J., The Idea of Public Reason Revisited, University of Chicago Law Review 64(3) (1997), pp. 765–807.
Reidy, D.A., Rawls's Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough, Res Publica 6 (2000), pp. 49–72.
Royal Institute of International Affairs Geneva 1954, The Settlement of the Indochinese War. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1969.
Ryan, A., Liberalism, in R. Goodin and P. Pettit (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
Sandel, M., Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Belknap Press, 1996.
Sartori, A., The Might of the Pen: A Reputational Theory of Communication in International Disputes, International Organization 56(1) (2002), pp. 121–149.
Schumpeter, R., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Allen & Unwin, 1950.
Smith, D.G., The Illiberalism of Liberalism: Religious Discourse in the Public Square, San Diego Law Review 34 (1997), pp. 1571–1641.
Sunstein, C., Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Swaine, L., How Ought Liberal Democracies to Treat Theocratic Communities, Ethics 111 (2001), pp. 302–343.
Swaine, L., Institutions of Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious Pluralism, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2003), pp. 93–118.
The Geneva Conference on Laos, 1961–1962 Washington, D.C., Library of Congress, Legislative Reference Service, 1968.
Thiemann, R.F., Religion in Public Life: A Dilemma for Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1996.
Thompson, J.W., and Padover, S.K., Secret Diplomacy: Espionage and Cryptography. 1500–1815, New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing, 1963.
Tuck, R., The Rights of War and Peace. Political Thought and the International Order From Grotius to Kant. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999.
Vernon, R., Political Morality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Waltz, K. N., Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.
Waltz, K.N., Theory of International Politics. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
Weber, C., Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane's Critique of Feminist International Relations, Millenium 23(2) (1994), pp. 337–49.
Wendt, A., Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Wertheimer, A., Internal Disagreements: Deliberation and Abortion, in S. Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Williams, A. The Alleged Incompleteness of Public Reason, Res Publica 6 (2000), pp. 199–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I do not know how even to begin thanking my spring 2003 graduate seminar for the wonderful discussions that allowed me to refine my thinking on this research project. In different ways the following individual members of the seminar were helpful: Amanda Dipaolo, Dimitria Gatzia, Michael McFall, Michael McKeon, Roald Nashi, Paul Prescott, Joshua Vermette, Amy Widestrom, and the two regular auditors, Cyril Ghosh and Darrell Driver. I have also profited from numerous discussions with other graduate students, including, early in this project, Steven Benko and, more constantly, Ali Shomali. Faculty colleagues who have commented on the work and suggested literatures for me to read and references to track include James Bennett, Hans Schmidt, Peg Hermann, Elizabeth Cohen, Jim Watts, Jim Wiggins, David Miller and Thomas Green. I am particularly grateful to Everita Silina, a graduate student who has been a constant friend and invaluable research assistant for the past five years. The Miami International Relations Theory group provided a critical venue to try out portions of this paper at the University of Miami campus on April 23, 2004. I then presented a later version of the paper to a Philosophy Department colloquium at the University of Miami on April 22, 2005. The comments made by those who attended one or both of the sessions were very helpful. I am also grateful to Ken Baynes and Ned McClennen for allowing me to be an unlisted third instructor in their seminar on “law, economics and public reason” in the fall semester 2004 at Syracuse University, and for the opportunity to present some of this work at one of the seminar meetings. If anything demonstrates the importance of a good collective setting on intellectual work this seminar was one such demonstration.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frohock, F.M. An Alternative Model of Political Reasoning. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 9, 27–64 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-7906-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-7906-4