Abstract
The goal of this paper is to better understand Kant’s conception of philosophy as a “world concept” (Weltbegriff), which is at the heart of the Architectonic of Pure Reason. This is pursued in two major parts. The first evaluates the textual foundation for reading Kant’s world concept of philosophy as cosmopolitanism and concludes that he most probably never himself equated philosophy as a world concept with any form of cosmopolitanism. The second major part of the paper clarifies this concept of philosophy through the specific role it plays in the argument of the Architectonic. Kant’s unique concept of science is examined and compared with several specific applications of it found elsewhere in Kant’s writings. From this it is concluded that Kant’s intention in the Architectonic was to derive his world concept of philosophy from its logical counterpart, namely the scholastic concept of philosophy, and that its function there is to provide the idea from which the entire structure (schema) of Kantian critical metaphysics can be derived. Philosophy as a world concept, it is further argued, is the complete system of critical or Kantian metaphysics in application and the philosopher in this sense is the ideal critical metaphysician who fully realizes its laws through her own understanding and will.
Ameriks, K. 2012a. Kant’s Elliptical Path. Oxford10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693689.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 2012b. “Kant’s Ambivalent Cosmopolitanism”. In Ameriks 2012a, 145–161.10.1515/9783110246490.55Search in Google Scholar
Bacin, S./Ferrarin, A./La Rocca, C./Ruffing, M. 2013. Kant und die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010. 5 vols. Berlin/Boston.10.1515/9783110246490Search in Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. 2013. Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials. Trans./ed. C. Fugate/J. Hymers. London/New York.10.5040/9781350244016Search in Google Scholar
Bianco, B. 2001. “Schulbegriff und Weltbegriff der Philosophie in der Wiener Logik”. In Vernunftkritik und Aufklärung: Studien zur Philosophie Kants und seines Jahrhunderts. Ed. M. Oberhausen in collaboration with H. P. Delfosse/R. Pozzo. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 41–57.Search in Google Scholar
Boswell, T. 1988. “On the Textual Authenticity of Kant’s Logic”. History and Philosophy of Logic 9, 193–203.10.1080/014453408808837133Search in Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. 2015. The Powers of Reason: Kant and the Idea of Cosmic Philosophy. Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226243290.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Friedrich, M. 2001. “Pölitz, Karl Heinrich Ludwig”. In Neue Deutsche Biographie 20, 562 f. Also available online at: http://www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd11624870X.html.Search in Google Scholar
Fugate, C. D. 2015. “The Unity of Metaphysics in Kant’s Lectures.”. In Reading Kant’s Lectures. Ed. R. Clewis. Berlin/Boston, 64–87.10.1515/9783110345339-008Search in Google Scholar
Gava, G. 2014. “Kant’s Definition of Science in the Architectonic of Pure Reason and the Essential Ends of Reason.” Kant-Studien 105, 372–393.10.1515/kant-2014-0016Search in Google Scholar
Grimm, J./Grimm, W. 1854–. “Weltbürger,” in Deutsches Wörterbuch. Edited by the Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin and maintained online at http://dwb.uni-trier.de/de/ by the Kompetenzzentrums für elektronische Erschließungs- und Publikationsverfahren in den Geisteswissenschaften an der Universität Trier.Search in Google Scholar
Hinske, N. 1995. Forschungen und Materialien zur deutschen Aufklärung. Abteilung III: Indices. Kant-Index. Section 1: Indices zum Kantschen Logikcorpus. Band 6.1: Stellenindex und Konkordanz zur ›Logik Pölitz‹. Prepared in collaboration with T. Boswell/H. P. Delfosse/R. Pozzo and assistance by S. Ganz/S. Harwardt/M. Oberhausen/M. Trauth. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2013. “Kants Verankerung der Kritik im Weltbegriff”. In Bacin 2013, vol. 1, 263–275.10.1515/9783110246490.263Search in Google Scholar
Höffe, O. 2006. Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace. Trans. a. Newton. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Kaldis, B. 2013. “Worldhood: Between Scholasticism and Cosmopolitanism.” In Bacin 2013, vol. 1, 589–601.10.1515/9783110246490.589Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1800. Logik: Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen. Edited by Gottlob Jäsche. Königsberg.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1821. Vorlesung über die Metaphysik. Ed. K. Pölitz. Erfurt.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998a. Logik-Vorlesung: Unveröffentlichte Nachschriften I – Logik Bauch. Ed. T. Pinder. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998b. Logik-Vorlesung: Unveröffentlichte Nachschriften II – Logik Hechsel, Warschau Logik. Ed. T. Pinder. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P. 1999. “Six Varieties of Cosmopolitanism in Late Eighteenth-Century Germany”. Journal of the History of Ideas 60, 505–524.10.1353/jhi.1999.0025Search in Google Scholar
Kresse, K. 2008. “Can Wisdom Be Taught? Kant, Sage Philosophy, and Ethnographic Reflections from the Swahili Coast”. In Teaching for Wisdom. Ed. M. Ferrari/G. Potworowski. Dordrecht, 189–206.10.1007/978-1-4020-6532-3_11Search in Google Scholar
Lindgren, J. R. 1963. “Kant’s Conceptus Cosmicus”. Dialogue 2, 280–300.10.1017/S0012217300029437Search in Google Scholar
Makkreel, R. A. 2013. “Differentiating Worldly and Cosmopolitan Senses of Philosophy in Kant”. In Bacin 2013. vol. 1, 644–652.Search in Google Scholar
Manchester, P. 2003. “Kant’s Conception of Architectonic in its Historical Context”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41, 187–207.10.1353/hph.2003.0016Search in Google Scholar
–. 2008. “Kant’s Conception of Architectonic in Its Philosophical Context”. Kantstudien 99, 133–151.10.1515/KANT.2008.010Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1997. “Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism”. The Journal of Political Philosophy 5, 1–25.10.1111/1467-9760.00021Search in Google Scholar
Stark, W. 1987. “Neue Kant-Logiken: Beobachtungen, Überlegungen und Daten zu gedruckten Kollegheften nach Kants Vorlesungen über Logik”. In Kant-Forschungen I. Ed. R. Brandt/W. Stark. Hamburg, 123–164.Search in Google Scholar
Tonelli, G. 1994. Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason” within the Tradition of Modern Logic. Ed. D. H. Chandler. Hildesheim.Search in Google Scholar
Uleman, J. K. 2010. An Introduction to Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge/New York.10.1017/CBO9780511801082Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, H. L. 2013. “Is Kant’s Worldly Concept of Philosophy really ‘Regional Philosophy’?”. In Bacin 2013, 763–772.10.1515/9783110246490.763Search in Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 2005. Erste Philosophie oder Ontologie: Lateinisch-Deutsch. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
Ypi, L. 2011. “Practical Agency, Teleology and System in Kant’s Architectonic of Pure Reason”. In Politics and Metaphysics in Kant. Ed. H. Williams/S. Baiasu/S. Philstrom. Cardiff, 134–151.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
