Abstract
“Prototypes” and “fuzziness” are regarded in this paper as fundamental phenomena in the inherent logic of concepts whose relationship, however, has not been sufficiently clarified. Therefore, modifications are proposed in the definition of both. Prototypes are defined as the elements possessing maximal degree of membership in the given category such thatthis membership has maximal cognitive efficiency in representing theelement. A modified fuzzy set (m-fuzzy set) is defined on aclass (possibly self-contradictory collection) such that its core (the collection of elements with full membership) is aset (self-consistent collection) comprising the finite set of the prototypes. In this scheme of recursive representation the possibility of contradictions, which has been proven to be inevitable in the logic of concepts, islocalized. Finally a related model of the brain's pattern recognition mechanism is briefly summarized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R. and Gleitman, H.: 1983, ‘What Some Concepts Might Not Be’,Cognition 13, 263–308.
Barsalou, L. W.: 1983, ‘Ad Hoc Categories’,Memory and Cognition 11, 211–27.
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E. and Raven, P. H.: 1973, ‘General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology’,American Anthropologist 75, 214–42.
Berlin, B. and Kay, P.: 1969,Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Cantor, N., Mischel, W. and Schwartz, J. C.: 1982, ‘A Prototype Analysis of Psychological Situations’,Cognitive Psychology 14, 45–77.
Chen, C. H.: 1973,Statistical Pattern Recognition, Hayden, New York.
Cohen, L. J.: 1981, ‘Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?’,Behavior and Brain Sciences 4 317–70.
Cohen, B. and Murphy, G. L.: 1984, ‘Models of Concepts’,Cognitive Science 8, 27–58.
Dahlgren, K.: 1985, ‘The Cognitive Structure of Social Categories’,Cognitive Science 9, 379–98.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: 1980,Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Academic Press, New York.
Fodor, J. A.: 1983,The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Fraenkel, A. A., Bar-Hillel, Y. and Levy, A.: 1973,Foundations of Set Theory, (2nd rev. ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Fu, K. S.: 1982,Syntactic Pattern Recognition and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: 1981, ‘Modelling the Visual Cortex with “Modulo System” Concept’,Biological Cybernetics 40, 39–48.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: 1982, ‘A Recognizing Neural Network: Modulo System, for Extracting and Syntactically Processing of the Important Properties of Patterns’, in R. Trappl, G. Pask and L. M. Ricciardi (eds.),Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research, IX, pp. 305–11, Hemisphere, Washington. Reprinted in R. K. Ragade (ed.),General Systems XXVII, pp. 147–53, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, 1983.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: 1984, ‘Syntax as the Model of Semantics in Brain Modelling’,Cybernetica 27, 39–56.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: 1985a, ‘Interdisciplinary Approach to the Brain's Pattern Recognition’,Cybernetica 28, 107–45.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: 1985b, ‘Arithmetic Model for the Distributed Encoding in the Neuron Module’,International Journal of Neuroscience 27, 131–48.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: 1985c, ‘Mathematical Approach to Integrating the “Neuron-Module” and the “Cell-Assembly”’,International Journal of Neuroscience 28, 91–110.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: 1986, ‘Arithmetic Codes Resembling Neural Encoding’,Information Sciences 39, 197–203.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: 1988, ‘Fuzziness of Concepts and Concepts of Fuzziness’,Synthese 75, 349–372.
Fuhrmann, Gy.: forthcoming a, Note on the Generality of Fuzzy Sets. (Submitted for publication.)
Fuhrmann, Gy.: forthcoming b, Note on the Integration of Prototype Theory and Fuzzy-set Theory. (Submitted for publication.)
Goguen, J. A.: 1969, ‘The Logic of Inexact Concepts’,Synthese 19, 325–73.
Goguen, J. A.: 1974, ‘Concept Representation in Natural and Artificial Languages: Axioms, Extensions, and Applications for Fuzzy Sets’,International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 6, 513–61. Reprinted in E. H. Mamdani and B. R. Gaines (eds.): 1981,Fuzzy Reasoning and Its Applications, Academic Press, New York, pp. 67–115.
Hampton, J. A.: 1982, ‘A Demonstration of Intransitivity in Natural Categories’,Cognition 12, 151–64.
Hebb, D. O.: 1949,The Organization of Behavior, Wiley, New York.
Hersch, H. M. and Caramazza, A.: 1976, ‘A Fuzzy Set Approach to Modifiers and Vagueness in Natural Language’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 105, 245–67.
Herskovits, A.: 1985, ‘Semantics and Pragmatics of Locative Expressions’,Cognitive Science 9, 341–78.
Jones, G. V.: 1982, ‘Stacks Not Fuzzy Sets: An Ordinal Basis for Prototype Theory of Concepts’,Cognition 12, 281–90.
Kandel, A.: 1986,Fuzzy Mathematical Techniques with Applications, Addison-Wesley, Reading.
Kaufmann, A.: 1975,Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets 1, Academic Press, New York.
Lewis, E. R.: 1983, ‘The Elements of Single Neurons: A Review’,IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 13, 702–10.
Loftus, E. F.: 1975, ‘Spreading Activation within Semantic Categories: Comments on Rosch's ‘Cognitive representations of semantic categories’’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 234–40.
Maurer, H. A., Salomaa, A. and Wood, D.: 1980, ‘Pure Grammars’,Information and Control 44, 47–72.
Mervis, C. B. and Rosch, E.: 1981, ‘Categorization of Natural Objects’,Annual Review of Psychology 32, 89–115.
Miller, G. A. and Johnson-Laird, P. N.: 1976,Language and Perception, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Mountcastle, V. B.: 1978, ‘An Organizing Principle for Cerebral Function: The Unit Module and the Distributed System’, in G. M. Edelman and V. B. Mountcastle:The Mindful Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 7–50. Reprinted in F. O. Schmitt and F. G. Worden (eds.),The Neurosciences: Fourth Study Program, pp. 21–42, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1979.
Murphy, G. L. and Smith, E. E.: 1982, ‘Basic-level Superiority in Picture Categorization’,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21, 1–20.
Oden, G. C.: 1977, ‘Integration of Fuzzy Logical Information’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3, 565–75.
Osheron, D. N. and Smith, E. E.: 1981, ‘On the Adequacy of Prototype Theory as a Theory of Concepts’,Cognition 9, 35–58.
Osheron, D. N. and Smith, E. E.: 1982, ‘Gradedness and Conceptual Combination’,Cognition 12, 299–318.
Piaget, J.: 1963, ‘L'explication en psychologie et le parallélisme psychophysiologique’, in J. Piaget, P. Fraisse and M. Reuchlin,Traité de psychologie expérimentale, I. Histoire et méthode, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp. 121–52.
Posner, M. I. and Keele, S. W.: 1968, ‘On the Genesis of Abstract Ideas’,Journal of Experimental Psychology 77, 353–63.
Reed, S. K.: 1972, ‘Pattern Recognition and Categorization’,Cognitive Psychology 3, 382–407.
Reed, S. K.: 1973,Psychological Processes in Pattern Recognition, Academic Press, New York.
Rescher, N.: 1969,Many-Valued Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Rosch, E.: 1973, ‘On the Internal Structure of Perceptual and Semantic Categories’, in T. E. Moore (ed.),Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Academic Press, New York, pp. 111–44.
Rosch, E.: 1975a, ‘Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 192–233.
Rosch, E.: 1975b, ‘Cognitive Reference Points’,Cognitive Psychology 7, 532–47.
Rosch, E.: 1978, ‘Principles of categorization’, in Rosch and Lloyd (1978), pp. 27–48.
Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. B. (eds.): 1978,Cognition and Categorization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. B.: 1975, ‘Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories’,Cognitive Psychology 7, 573–605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M. and Boyes-Braem, P.: 1976, ‘Basic Objects in Natural Categories’,Cognitive Psychology 8, 382–439.
Rosch, E., Simpson, C. and Miller, R. S.: 1976, ‘Structural Basis of Typicality Effects’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2, 491–502.
Roth, E. M. and Mervis, C. B.: 1983, ‘Fuzzy Set Theory and Class Inclusion Relations in Semantic Categories’,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22, 509–25.
Salomaa, A.: 1973,Formal Languages, Academic Press, New York. (Chapter V, ‘Regulated Rewriting’, pp. 142–94.)
Simpson, G. G.: 1961,Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University, New York.
Smith, E. E. and Osheron, D. N.: 1984, ‘Conceptual Combination with Prototype Concepts’,Cognitive Science 8, 337–61.
Szentágothai, J.: 1975, ‘The “Module Concept’ in Cerebral Cortex Architecture’,Brain Research 95, 475–96.
Szentágothai, J.: 1978, ‘The Neuron Network of the Cerebral Cortex: A Functional Interpretation’,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 201, 219–48.
Tversky, A.: 1977, ‘Features of Similarity’,Psychological Review 84, 317–52.
Tversky, A. and Hemenway, K.: 1983, ‘Categories of Environmental Scenes’,Cognitive Psychology 15, 121–49.
Vizi, E. S.: 1984,Non-synaptic Interactions Among Neurons, Wiley, New York.
Zadeh, L. A.: 1965, ‘Fuzzy Sets’,Information and Control 8, 338–53.
Zadeh, L. A.: 1975, ‘Calculus of Fuzzy Restrictions’, in L. A. Zadeh, K. S. Fu, K. Tanaka and M. Shimura (eds.),Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–39.
Zadeh, L. A.: 1976, ‘A Fuzzy Algorithmic Approach to the Definition of Complex or Imprecise Concepts’,International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 8, 249–91.
Zadeh, L. A.: 1982, ‘A Note on Prototype Theory and Fuzzy Sets’,Cognition 12, 291–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuhrmann, G. “Prototypes” and “fuzziness” in the logic of concepts. Synthese 75, 317–347 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869404
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869404