Abstract
What I propose is to explicit the relationship between two dimensions, which, in my opinion, are inseparable from any discourse about vulnerability. On the one hand, the horizon of politics and institutions, the horizon of practice; on the other, that relative to the definition of the ‘humanity of the human’, the theoretical horizon. To talk about the ‘politics of vulnerability’, we need to understand what is meant by vulnerability and the dimensions it implies. In this particular case, I want to discuss two philosophers who found a way to keep these two dimensions together, namely, Judith Butler and Simone Weil. The thesis I would like to arrive at could be articulated in the following points: (1) vulnerability is ‘constitutive’ of the humanity of the human; (2) vulnerability also stems from certain discourses of power; (3) to accept vulnerability as the common trait of humanity can be the basis upon which to construct a nonviolent or least violent possible coexistence; (4) in order to arrive at this, the philosophical and political problems to be addressed are ‘attention for’ and ‘recognition’ of vulnerability, and this implies circumstances where vulnerability is not obvious or is not recognised as such.
There is in each human being something sacred. But it is not his person, which is not anything more than his personality. It is him, this man, wholly and simply.
There is a passerby in the street who has long arms, blue eyes, a mind where thoughts are swirling that I know nothing about, but that may well be nothing special.
It is neither his person nor his personality that is sacred to me. It is him. Him as a whole. Arms, eyes, thoughts, everything. I would not violate any of this without infinite scruples
Simone Weil, Human Personality, 1943
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
One of the reasons why this issue has not been adequately explored is because confronted with the malheur, as Simone Weil says, recoiling is the spontaneous response: “Thought revolts from contemplating affliction, to the same degree that living flesh recoils from death. A stag advancing voluntarily step by step to offer itself to the teeth of a pack of hounds is about as probable as an act of attention directed towards a real affliction, which is close at hand, on the part of a mind which is free to avoid it” [2, p. 85].
- 2.
However, in the malheur there is something ‘inassumable’, as Levinas argued about suffering: “Suffering is, of course, a datum in consciousness, a certain ‘psychological content,’ similar to the lived experience of color, sound, contact, or any other sensation. However, in this very ‘content’ it is an in-spite-of consciousness, the unassumable. The unassumable and ‘unassumability’” [3, p. 91]. About Levinas’ philosophy see [4].
- 3.
It is no coincidence that Levinas strongly proclaims the uselessness of all suffering: “Thus, the least one can say about suffering is that, in its own phenomenality, intrinsically, it is useless: ‘for nothing.’ Doubtless this depth of meaninglessness that the analysis seems to suggest is confirmed by empirical situations of pain, in which pain remains undiluted, so to speak, and isolates itself in consciousness, or absorbs the rest of consciousness” [3, p. 93]. I focused on this issue in [5].
- 4.
The question of the relationship between subjectivity, power and vulnerability is the core of [7].
- 5.
We have seen during the Covid 19 pandemic, how the concept of ‘obligation to the other’ has been used by all governments that have decided to practice policies of restricting freedom and lock down. The issue of obligation, in that case, is intertwined with that of community and immunity. To clarify these issues, the work of Roberto Esposito is indispensable: see [9, 10].
References
Weil S (1956) The notebooks of Simone Weil, vol 1. Putnam’s, New York
Weil S (2005) Human personality in Id, an anthology. Penguin Books, London
Levinas E (1998) Useless suffering, in id, Entre Nous. on thinking-of-the-other. Columbia University Press, New York
Fulco R (2013) Essere insieme in un luogo. Etica, politica e diritto nel pensiero di Emmanuel Levinas. Mimesis, Milano-Udine
Fulco R (2022) Life and useless suffering: responsibility for others and the impossible theodicy. In Benso S (ed) Rethinking life. Italian philosophy in Precarius Times. SUNY, New York, pp 145–158
Weil S (1991) The Iliad or the poem of force. Pendle Ill, Wallingford Pennsylvania
Fulco R (2020) Soggettività e potere. Ontologia della vulnerabilità in Simone Weil. Quodlibet, Macerata
Weil S (2002) The need for roots. prelude to a declaration of duties towards mankind. Routledge, London and New York
Esposito R (2011) Immunitas. the protection and negation of life. Polity Press, Cambridge
Christiaens T, De Cauwer S (2020), The biopolitics of immunity in times of COVID-19: an interview with Roberto Esposito: https://antipodeonline.org/2020/06/16/interview-with-roberto-esposito/?fbclid=IwAR16BcM07RjGaOOpmJkL3qn8JSBn2UsqXx8FB7dVhBK9WL-lP8FSUyuuzz8
Butler J (2004) Violence, mourning, politics. In: Butler J, Precarious life. the power of mourning and violence. Verso, London-New York
Butler J (2015) Bodily vulnerability, coalitional politics. In: Butler J, Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) and London
Esposito R (2021) Instituting thought: three paradigms of political ontology. Polity, Cambridge and New York
Fulco R (2021) A political ontology for Europe: Roberto Esposito’s instituent paradigm. Cont Philos Rev 54:367–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-021-09542-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fulco, R. (2023). Humanity of the Human and the Politics of Vulnerability. In: Achella, S., Marazia, C. (eds) Vulnerabilities. Integrated Science, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39378-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39378-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39377-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39378-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)