Abstract
The phenomenon of industrial melanism (IM) became widely acknowledged as a well-documented example of natural selection largely as a result of H.B.D. Kettlewell’s pioneering research on the subject in the early 1950s. It was quickly picked up by American biology textbooks starting in the early 1960s and became ubiquitous throughout the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. While recent research on the phenomenon broadly supports Kettlewell’s explanation of IM in the peppered moth, which in turn has strengthened this example of natural selection, textbook IM entries have actually declined in recent years in favor of other examples. In a previous paper, we drew attention to the pivotal role visual aspects played in the introduction of IM into (and its subsequent removal from) textbook accounts. The present article continues this investigation by analyzing textual passages on industrial melanism within a stratified random sample of textbooks from the 1960s to the 2000s. The fact that this example of natural selection was included by multiple publishers independently, in a short period of time, makes it uniquely qualified for a textbook study of this kind. The purpose of the present project was to determine whether these textbooks contain what has come to be known as the standard peppered moth story. Three complete series were also inspected for change across time. Our analysis focused on (1) the amount of text devoted to industrial melanism; (2) what specific science content elements were present; and (3) what, if any, nature of science (NOS) aspects were included. The study documents an increase in the amount of text devoted to industrial melanism over the decades. In spite of this increase, only modest changes in science content and NOS aspects were found.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Teaching, 45(7), 835–855.
Allchin, D. K. (2002). Kettlewell’s missing evidence. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(4), 240–245.
Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891–1901.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061 benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blachowicz, J. (2009). How science textbooks treat scientific method: A philosopher’s perspective. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 60, 303–344.
Brito, A., Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2005). A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 84–111.
Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2009). Biology (8th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings/Pearson Education Inc.
Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2008). See the wood for the trees: An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks. BioScience, 58(10), 976–988.
Cengage Annual Report. (2010). www.Cengage.com/investor/annual_reports.html.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 713–725.
Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 939–951.
Clough, M. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(5), 463–494.
Clough, M. (2011). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 701–717.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
Cook, L. M. (2003). The rise and fall of the carbonaria form of the peppered moth. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 78, 399–417.
Cook, L. M., Grant, B. S., Saccheri, I. J., & Mallet, J. (2012). Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: The last experiment of Michael Majerus. Biological Letters, 8(4), 609–612.
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Encyclopedia Dubuque. (2011). http://www.encyclopediadubuque.org/index.php?title=WILLIAM_.
Grant, B. S. (1999). Fine tuning the peppered moth paradigm. Evolution, 53(3), 980–984.
Grant, B. S., Owen, D. F., & Clarke, C. A. (1996). Parallel rise and fall of melanic peppered moths in America and Britain. Journal of Heredity, 87, 351–357.
Guisasola, J. K., Almudi, J. M., & Furio, C. (2005). The nature of science and its implications for physics textbooks. Science & Education, 14(3–4), 321–338.
Hagen, J. (1996). H. B. D. Kettlewell & the peppered moths. In J. B. Hagen, D. K. Allchin, & F. Singer (Eds.), Doing biology (pp. 1–20). Glenview, IL: Harper Collins.
Hooper, J. (2002). Of moths and men: An evolutionary tale. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Klassen, S. (2009). The construction and analysis of a science story: A proposed methodology. Science & Education, 18(3–4), 401–423.
Klassen, S. (2010). The relation of story structure to a model of conceptual change in science learning. Science & Education, 19(3), 305–317.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
Kubli, F. (2001). Can the theory of narratives help science teachers be better storytellers? Science & Education, 10(6), 595–599.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Liete, L. (2002). History of science in science education: Development and validation of a checklist for analyzing the historical content of science textbooks. Science & Education, 11(4), 333–359.
Majerus, M. E. N. (1998). Melanism: Evolution in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Majerus, M. E. N. (2005). The peppered moth: Decline of a Darwinian disciple. In M. D. E. Fellowes, G. J. Holloway, & J. Rolff (Eds.), Insect evolutionary ecology (pp. 371–396). Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.
Majerus, M. E. N. (2009). Industrial melanism in the peppered moth, Biston betularia: An excellent teaching example of Darwinian evolution in action. Evolution Education Outreach, 2, 63–74.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Matzke, N. (2004). Icon of obfuscation. The Talk Origins Archive. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wells/iconob.html.
McComas, W. (2003). A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 141–155.
McComas, W. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 249–263.
McGraw-Hill Annual Report. (2011). www.mcgraw-hill.com/about/annual_report/ar2011.pdf.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nehm, R. H., Poole, T. M., Lyford, M. E., Hoskins, S. G., Carruth, L., Ewere, B. E., & Colberg, P. J. S. (2009). Does the segregation of evolution in biology textbooks and introductory courses reinforce students’ faulty mental models of biology and evolution? Evolution Education Outreach, 2, 527–532.
Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263–272.
Nehm, R. H., & Young, R. (2008). “Sex hormones” in secondary school biology textbooks. Science & Education, 17(10), 1175–1190.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS.
Niaz, M., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2005). The oil drop experiment: Do physical chemistry textbooks refer to its controversial nature? Science & Education, 14(1), 43–57.
Pearson Education Annual Report. (2005). http://ar2005.pearson.com/operating/education.html.
Pearson Education Annual Report. (2007). http://ar2007.pearson.com/operating/education.html.
Publishers Weekly. (2010). www.publishersweekly.com//pw/by-topic/international/international-book-news/article/43564-global-publishing-rankings-2009.html.
Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2004). A reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks: A history and philosophy of science perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 409–424.
Rudge, D. W. (2000). Does being wrong make Kettlewell wrong for science teaching? Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 5–11.
Rudge, D. W. (2003). The role of photographs and films in Kettlewell’s popularizations of the phenomenon of industrial melanism. Science & Education, 12(3), 261–287.
Rudge, D. W. (2004). The mystery phenomenon: Lesson plans. In D. Metz (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventh international history, philosophy and science teaching group meeting (pp. 773–811). IHPST: Winnipeg, Canada.
Rudge, D. W. (2005). Did Kettlewell commit fraud? Re-examining the evidence. Public Understanding of Science, 14(3), 249–268.
Rudge, D. W. (2006). Myths about moths: A study in contrasts. Endeavour, 30(1), 19–23.
Rudge, D. W., Cassidy, D. P., Fulford, J. M., & Howe, E. M. (2014). Changes observed in views of nature of science in a historically based unit. Science & Education, 23(9), 1879–1909.
Rudge, D. W., & Fulford, J. M. (2011). The role of visual imagery in textbook portrayals of industrial melanism. In F. Seroglou, V. Koulountzos & A. Siatras (Eds.), Science & culture: promise, challenge and demand, book of proceedings for the eleventh international history, philosophy & science teaching (IHPST) and sixth greek history, philosophy and science teaching joint conference, Aristotle University, 1–5 July 2011 (pp. 630–637). Thessaloniki, Greece: Epikentro Publications.
Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18(5), 561–580.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.
Skoog, G. (1979). Topic of evolution in secondary school biology textbooks: 1900–1977. Science Education, 63(5), 621–640.
Skoog, G. (1984). The coverage of evolution in high school biology textbooks published in the 1980s. Science Education, 68(2), 117–128.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., & Scot, L. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421.
Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Finding from Project 2016’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.
Weiss, I., Banilower, E., McMahon, K., & Smith, P. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
Appendix: Codes for Questions 2 and 3
Appendix: Codes for Questions 2 and 3
Code number | |
---|---|
Question 2: Are there any trends over time in what content is included? | |
1 Standard | There are two forms of the peppered moth (light and dark) |
2 | There are three forms of the peppered moth (light, intermediate and dark) |
3 Standard | The dark form is controlled by a single gene which is dominant over the light form |
4 | Intermediate form is controlled by a complex of genes, which is dominant to the light form but recessive to the dark form |
5 Standard | Peppered moths fly at night and/or rest on during the day (On trees or other sites) |
6 Standard | Moths are eaten by birds. (Moths are eaten by a visual predator) |
7 Standard | The moth’s camouflage determines how easily it can be spotted (on resting site) by visual predators/birds |
8 Standard | Moth frequencies in a particular area are dependent on relative level of bird predation |
9 | Moth frequencies in a particular area are dependent on migration from areas where form frequencies are different |
10 | Melanism in some species was observed before the industrial revolution |
11 | Other moth species have undergone industrial melanism |
Question 3: Are there any trends in pre-Kettlewell, Kettlewell or post-Kettlewell investigations on IM? | |
1 | Insect collecting is a popular past time in England |
2 | Amateurs provided data on changes on wing color/pattern in moths |
3 | Tutt’s explanation of melanic moths |
4 | Haldane’s survey data on peppered moths |
5 | Heslop Harrison mentioned by name |
6 | Harrison’s caterpillar experiments |
7 | Harrison’s claim of inheritance of acquired traits |
8 | Controversies with Harrison’s work |
9 | E.B. Ford is mentioned by name |
10 | Ford’s explanation of natural selection acting on camouflage and physiological advantages |
11 | Ford’s role as a mentor to Kettlewell |
12 Typical | H.B.D. Kettlewell mentioned by name |
13 Typical | Kettlewell’s field investigations |
14 | Kettlewell’s moth survey |
15 | Kettlewell’s visibility scores with human observers |
16 Typical | Kettlewell’s mark–release–recapture experiments |
17 Typical | Kettlewell’s predation observations |
18 | Kettlewell’s background choice experiments |
19 Typical | Kettlewell’s explanation of natural selection by bird predation |
20 | Controversies surrounding Kettlewell’s work |
21 | Kettlewell’s leaf-washing experiments |
22 | The mark–release–recapture experiments called a controlled experiment |
23 Typical | The decline of melanics due to clean-air legislation |
24 | Post-Kettlewell research |
25 | Post-Kettlewell researchers mentioned by name |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fulford, J.M., Rudge, D.W. The Portrayal of Industrial Melanism in American College General Biology Textbooks. Sci & Educ 25, 547–574 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9820-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9820-z