Skip to main content
Log in

The Portrayal of Industrial Melanism in American College General Biology Textbooks

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phenomenon of industrial melanism (IM) became widely acknowledged as a well-documented example of natural selection largely as a result of H.B.D. Kettlewell’s pioneering research on the subject in the early 1950s. It was quickly picked up by American biology textbooks starting in the early 1960s and became ubiquitous throughout the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. While recent research on the phenomenon broadly supports Kettlewell’s explanation of IM in the peppered moth, which in turn has strengthened this example of natural selection, textbook IM entries have actually declined in recent years in favor of other examples. In a previous paper, we drew attention to the pivotal role visual aspects played in the introduction of IM into (and its subsequent removal from) textbook accounts. The present article continues this investigation by analyzing textual passages on industrial melanism within a stratified random sample of textbooks from the 1960s to the 2000s. The fact that this example of natural selection was included by multiple publishers independently, in a short period of time, makes it uniquely qualified for a textbook study of this kind. The purpose of the present project was to determine whether these textbooks contain what has come to be known as the standard peppered moth story. Three complete series were also inspected for change across time. Our analysis focused on (1) the amount of text devoted to industrial melanism; (2) what specific science content elements were present; and (3) what, if any, nature of science (NOS) aspects were included. The study documents an increase in the amount of text devoted to industrial melanism over the decades. In spite of this increase, only modest changes in science content and NOS aspects were found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Teaching, 45(7), 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. K. (2002). Kettlewell’s missing evidence. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(4), 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061 benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachowicz, J. (2009). How science textbooks treat scientific method: A philosopher’s perspective. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 60, 303–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, A., Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2005). A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 84–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2009). Biology (8th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings/Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2008). See the wood for the trees: An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks. BioScience, 58(10), 976–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cengage Annual Report. (2010). www.Cengage.com/investor/annual_reports.html.

  • Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 939–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(5), 463–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. (2011). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L. M. (2003). The rise and fall of the carbonaria form of the peppered moth. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 78, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L. M., Grant, B. S., Saccheri, I. J., & Mallet, J. (2012). Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: The last experiment of Michael Majerus. Biological Letters, 8(4), 609–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Dubuque. (2011). http://www.encyclopediadubuque.org/index.php?title=WILLIAM_.

  • Grant, B. S. (1999). Fine tuning the peppered moth paradigm. Evolution, 53(3), 980–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, B. S., Owen, D. F., & Clarke, C. A. (1996). Parallel rise and fall of melanic peppered moths in America and Britain. Journal of Heredity, 87, 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisasola, J. K., Almudi, J. M., & Furio, C. (2005). The nature of science and its implications for physics textbooks. Science & Education, 14(3–4), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J. (1996). H. B. D. Kettlewell & the peppered moths. In J. B. Hagen, D. K. Allchin, & F. Singer (Eds.), Doing biology (pp. 1–20). Glenview, IL: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, J. (2002). Of moths and men: An evolutionary tale. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, S. (2009). The construction and analysis of a science story: A proposed methodology. Science & Education, 18(3–4), 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, S. (2010). The relation of story structure to a model of conceptual change in science learning. Science & Education, 19(3), 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubli, F. (2001). Can the theory of narratives help science teachers be better storytellers? Science & Education, 10(6), 595–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liete, L. (2002). History of science in science education: Development and validation of a checklist for analyzing the historical content of science textbooks. Science & Education, 11(4), 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majerus, M. E. N. (1998). Melanism: Evolution in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majerus, M. E. N. (2005). The peppered moth: Decline of a Darwinian disciple. In M. D. E. Fellowes, G. J. Holloway, & J. Rolff (Eds.), Insect evolutionary ecology (pp. 371–396). Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majerus, M. E. N. (2009). Industrial melanism in the peppered moth, Biston betularia: An excellent teaching example of Darwinian evolution in action. Evolution Education Outreach, 2, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzke, N. (2004). Icon of obfuscation. The Talk Origins Archive. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wells/iconob.html.

  • McComas, W. (2003). A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw-Hill Annual Report. (2011). www.mcgraw-hill.com/about/annual_report/ar2011.pdf.

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Poole, T. M., Lyford, M. E., Hoskins, S. G., Carruth, L., Ewere, B. E., & Colberg, P. J. S. (2009). Does the segregation of evolution in biology textbooks and introductory courses reinforce students’ faulty mental models of biology and evolution? Evolution Education Outreach, 2, 527–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Young, R. (2008). “Sex hormones” in secondary school biology textbooks. Science & Education, 17(10), 1175–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS.

  • Niaz, M., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2005). The oil drop experiment: Do physical chemistry textbooks refer to its controversial nature? Science & Education, 14(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson Education Annual Report. (2005). http://ar2005.pearson.com/operating/education.html.

  • Pearson Education Annual Report. (2007). http://ar2007.pearson.com/operating/education.html.

  • Publishers Weekly. (2010). www.publishersweekly.com//pw/by-topic/international/international-book-news/article/43564-global-publishing-rankings-2009.html.

  • Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2004). A reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks: A history and philosophy of science perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W. (2000). Does being wrong make Kettlewell wrong for science teaching? Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W. (2003). The role of photographs and films in Kettlewell’s popularizations of the phenomenon of industrial melanism. Science & Education, 12(3), 261–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W. (2004). The mystery phenomenon: Lesson plans. In D. Metz (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventh international history, philosophy and science teaching group meeting (pp. 773–811). IHPST: Winnipeg, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W. (2005). Did Kettlewell commit fraud? Re-examining the evidence. Public Understanding of Science, 14(3), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W. (2006). Myths about moths: A study in contrasts. Endeavour, 30(1), 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W., Cassidy, D. P., Fulford, J. M., & Howe, E. M. (2014). Changes observed in views of nature of science in a historically based unit. Science & Education, 23(9), 1879–1909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W., & Fulford, J. M. (2011). The role of visual imagery in textbook portrayals of industrial melanism. In F. Seroglou, V. Koulountzos & A. Siatras (Eds.), Science & culture: promise, challenge and demand, book of proceedings for the eleventh international history, philosophy & science teaching (IHPST) and sixth greek history, philosophy and science teaching joint conference, Aristotle University, 15 July 2011 (pp. 630–637). Thessaloniki, Greece: Epikentro Publications.

  • Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18(5), 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoog, G. (1979). Topic of evolution in secondary school biology textbooks: 1900–1977. Science Education, 63(5), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoog, G. (1984). The coverage of evolution in high school biology textbooks published in the 1980s. Science Education, 68(2), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., Duveen, J., & Scot, L. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Finding from Project 2016’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I., Banilower, E., McMahon, K., & Smith, P. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janice Marie Fulford.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Appendix: Codes for Questions 2 and 3

Appendix: Codes for Questions 2 and 3

Code number

 
 

Question 2: Are there any trends over time in what content is included?

1 Standard

There are two forms of the peppered moth (light and dark)

2

There are three forms of the peppered moth (light, intermediate and dark)

3 Standard

The dark form is controlled by a single gene which is dominant over the light form

4

Intermediate form is controlled by a complex of genes, which is dominant to the light form but recessive to the dark form

5 Standard

Peppered moths fly at night and/or rest on during the day (On trees or other sites)

6 Standard

Moths are eaten by birds. (Moths are eaten by a visual predator)

7 Standard

The moth’s camouflage determines how easily it can be spotted (on resting site) by visual predators/birds

8 Standard

Moth frequencies in a particular area are dependent on relative level of bird predation

9

Moth frequencies in a particular area are dependent on migration from areas where form frequencies are different

10

Melanism in some species was observed before the industrial revolution

11

Other moth species have undergone industrial melanism

 

Question 3: Are there any trends in pre-Kettlewell, Kettlewell or post-Kettlewell investigations on IM?

1

Insect collecting is a popular past time in England

2

Amateurs provided data on changes on wing color/pattern in moths

3

Tutt’s explanation of melanic moths

4

Haldane’s survey data on peppered moths

5

Heslop Harrison mentioned by name

6

Harrison’s caterpillar experiments

7

Harrison’s claim of inheritance of acquired traits

8

Controversies with Harrison’s work

9

E.B. Ford is mentioned by name

10

Ford’s explanation of natural selection acting on camouflage and physiological advantages

11

Ford’s role as a mentor to Kettlewell

12 Typical

H.B.D. Kettlewell mentioned by name

13 Typical

Kettlewell’s field investigations

14

Kettlewell’s moth survey

15

Kettlewell’s visibility scores with human observers

16 Typical

Kettlewell’s mark–release–recapture experiments

17 Typical

Kettlewell’s predation observations

18

Kettlewell’s background choice experiments

19 Typical

Kettlewell’s explanation of natural selection by bird predation

20

Controversies surrounding Kettlewell’s work

21

Kettlewell’s leaf-washing experiments

22

The mark–release–recapture experiments called a controlled experiment

23 Typical

The decline of melanics due to clean-air legislation

24

Post-Kettlewell research

25

Post-Kettlewell researchers mentioned by name

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fulford, J.M., Rudge, D.W. The Portrayal of Industrial Melanism in American College General Biology Textbooks. Sci & Educ 25, 547–574 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9820-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9820-z

Keywords

Navigation