Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The process of science

Edited by Nancy J. Nersessian. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston and Lancaster, 1987. Pp. xiii + 221

  • Discussion Review
  • Naturalism Historicized, or Back to Hegel
  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brannigan, A.: 1981,The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L. and N., Maull: 1977. ‘Interfield Theories’,Philosophy of Science 44, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1986, ‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs’, in E. LePore (ed.),Truth and Interpretation, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • De, Mey, M.: 1982,The Cognitive Paradigm, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, C.: 1988, ‘Background Knowledge and Natural Language Understanding’, in H. Otto and J. Tuedio (eds.),Perspectives on Mind, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 261–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1983,The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S.: 1988,Social Epistemology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K.: 1980,The Manufacture of Knowledge, Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, H.: 1988, ‘How Internal Can You Get?’,Synthese,74, 313–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave (eds.): 1970,Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1984,Science and Values, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. et al.: 1986, ‘Testing Theories of Scientific Change’,Synthese 69, 141–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1979,The Differentiation of Society, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manier, E.: 1986, ‘Social Dimensions of the Mind/Body Problem: Turbulence in the Flow of Scientific Information’,Science and Technology Studies 4, 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T.: 1986, ‘Remarks on the Use of History as Evidence’,Synthese 69, 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, H.: 1986 (1902),The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D.: 1984 (1960–82),Reason and the Search for Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D.: 1988,Genius in Science: A Psychology of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S.: 1986, ‘The Sociology of Science in Its Place: Comment on Shapere’,Science & Technology Studies 4, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 1964 (1904–19),The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S.: 1988,Science: The Very Idea, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for the Study of Science in Society, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 24061, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Steve Fuller

Authors
  1. Steve Fuller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuller, S. The process of science. Erkenntnis 33, 121–129 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634554

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634554

Search

Navigation