Skip to main content
Log in

An Axiomatic Characterization of Causal Counterfactuals

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the causal interpretation of counterfactual sentences using a modifiable structural equation model. It is shown that two properties of counterfactuals, namely, composition and effectiveness, are sound and complete relative to this interpretation, when recursive (i.e., feedback-less) models are considered. Composition and effectiveness also hold in Lewis's closest-world semantics, which implies that for recursive models the causal interpretation imposes no restrictions beyond those embodied in Lewis's framework. A third property, called reversibility, holds in nonrecursive causal models but not in Lewis's closest-world semantics, which implies that Lewis's axioms do not capture some properties of systems with feedback. Causal inferences based on counterfactual analysis are exemplified and compared to those based on graphical models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J.D. Angrist, G.W. Imbens, and Rubin D.B. (1996), ‘Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables (with comments).’ Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434):444–472, June.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Balke and J. Pearl (1994), ‘Counterfactual probabilities: Computation methods, bounds, and applications’, in: R.L. de Mantaras and D. Poole (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 11–18, San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Balke and J. Pearl (1995), ‘Counterfactuals and policy analysis in structural models’ in: P. Besnard and S. Hanks, (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 11–18, San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Bowden and D.A. Turkington (1984), Instrumental Variables. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.P. Dawid (1997), Causal inference without counterfactuals. Technical Report, Department of Statistical Science, University College London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Dhrymcs (1970), Economctrics. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.F. Engle, D.F. Hendry, and J.F. Richard (1983), ‘Exogeneity’. Econometrical, 51(2):277–304, March.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Fagin, J.M. Halpert, Y. Moses, and M.Y. Vardi (1995), Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.M. Fisher (1966), The Identification Problem in Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.M. Fisher (1970), ‘A correspondence principle for simultaneous equation models’. Econometrica, 38:73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Galles and J. Pearl (1997a) An axiomatic characterization of causal counterfactuals. Technical Report R-250-L, Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, March 1997. Prepared for Foundations of Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Galles and J. Pearl (1997b), ‘Axioms of causal relevance’, Artificial Intelligence, 97(1–2):9–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Gibbard and L. Harper (1981), ‘Counterfactuals and two kinds of expected utility’, in: W.L. Harper, R. Stalnaker, and G. Pearce, (eds.), Ifs. D. Reidel, Dordrecht: Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.L. Ginsberg and D.E. Smith (1987), ‘Reasoning about action I: A possible worlds approach’, In Frank M. Brown, (ed.), The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, pages 233–258. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur S. Goldberger (1992), ‘Models of substance [comment on N. Wermuth, “On block-recursive linear regression equations”]’. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 6:1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Halpern (1997), Axiomatizing causal structures. Unpublished report, Cornell University, May.

  • D. Heckerman and R. Shachter (1995), ‘A definition and graphical representation of causality’, in: P. Besnard and S. Hanks, (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 262–273, San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • David F. Hendry (1995), Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. W. Holland (1986), ‘Statistics and causal inference (with discussion)’. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396):945–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.W. Holland (1988), ‘Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models.’ In C. Clogg, editor, Sociological Methodology, pages 449–484. American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Katsuno and A.O. Mendelzon (1991), ‘On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it.’ In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, pages 387–394. Boston, MA.

  • T.C. Koopmans (1950), ‘When is an equation system complete for statistical purposes?’ In T.C. Koopmans, (ed.), Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models, Cowles Commission, Monograph 10. Wiley, New York. Reprinted in D.F. Hendry and M.S. Morgan (Eds.), The Foundations of Econometric Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 527–537, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Leamer (1985), ‘Vector autoregression for causal inference?’ Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 22:255–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1973a), ‘Causation.’ Journal of Philosophy, 70:556–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1973b), Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1981), ‘Counterfactuals and comparative possibility’, in: W.L. Harper, R. Stalnaker, and G. Pearce, (eds.), Ifs. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.F. Manski (1990), ‘Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects.’ American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 80:319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Meditch (1969), Stochastic Optimal Linear Estimation and Control. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pearl (1988), Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann San Mateo, CA. (Revised 2nd printing, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pearl (1994), ‘A probabilistic calculus of actions’, in: R.L. de Mantaras and D. Poole, (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 454–462, San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pearl (1995a), ‘Causal diagrams for empirical research (with discussion). Biometrika, 82(4):669–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Pearl (1995b), On the testability of causal models with latent and instrumental variables.’ In P. Besnard and S. Hanks, (eds), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 11, pages 435–443. Morgan Kaufmann.

  • J. Pearl (1996), ‘Structural and probabilistic causality.’ Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 34:393–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Pearl (1997a), “The new challenge: From a century of statistics to an age of causation.’ Computing Science and Statistics, 29(2):415–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pearl (1997b), ‘On the identification of nonparametric structural models.’ In M. Berkane, (ed.), Latent Variable Modeling with Application to Causality, pages 29–68. Springer-Verlag.

  • J. Pearl (1998a), Graphs, causality, and structural equation models. Technical Report R-253, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles. To appear in Sociological Methods and Research, Special Issue on Causality.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pearl (1998b), Why there is no statistical test for confounding, why many think there is, and why they are almost right. Technical Report R-256, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Pratt and R. Schlaifer (1988), ‘On the interpretation and observation of laws.’ Journal of Econometrics, 39:23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Richard (1980), ‘Models with several regimes and charges in exogeneity.’ The Review of Economic Studies, 47:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Robins (1986), ‘A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period — applications to control of the healthy workers survivor effect.’ Mathematical Modeling, 7:1393–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Robins (1987), ‘Addendum to “A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods — application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect”.’ Computers and Mathematics, with Applications., 14:923–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Robins (1995), ‘Discussion of “Causal diagrams for empirical research” by J. Pearl.’ Biometrika, 82(4):695–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Rosenbaum and D. Rubin (1983), ‘The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.’ Biometrika, 70:41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.B. Rubin (1974), ‘Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.’ Journal of Educational Psychology, 66:688–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.A. Simon and N. Rescher (1966), ‘Cause and counterfactual.’ Philosophy and Science, 33:323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Sobel (1990), ‘Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models.’ Psychometrika, 55:495–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, and R. Schienes (1993), Causation, Prediction, and Search. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Strotz and O.A. Wold (1960), ‘Recursive versus nonrecursive systems: At attempt at synthesis.’ Econometrica, 28:417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Winslett (1988), ‘Reasoning about action using a possible worlds approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh American Association for Artificial Intelligenc Conference, pages 89–93.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galles, D., Pearl, J. An Axiomatic Characterization of Causal Counterfactuals. Foundations of Science 3, 151–182 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009602825894

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009602825894

Navigation