Skip to main content
Log in

Intersubjectivity in perception

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The embodied, embedded, enactive, and extended approaches to cognition explicate many important details for a phenomenology of perception, and are consistent with some of the traditional phenomenological analyses. Theorists working in these areas, however, often fail to provide an account of how intersubjectivity might relate to perception. This paper suggests some ways in which intersubjectivity is important for an adequate account of perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Straus (1966, p. 138).

  2. Gibson (1979).

  3. Paillard (2000).

  4. Chiel and Beer (1997).

  5. Zajac (1993).

  6. Clark (1997).

  7. Chiel and Beer (1997, p. 554).

  8. Gallagher (2005a).

  9. Buytendijk (1974); Sandman (1986); Sheets-Johnstone (1999a).

  10. See Gallagher (in press), for a fuller account of the philosophical roots of the situated cognition idea.

  11. Dewey (1884, p. 280).

  12. Dewey (1938, p. 67).

  13. Wheeler (2005) gives a good account of Heidegger in this context.

  14. Heidegger (1968, p. 95).

  15. Ibid., pp. 86–90.

  16. Merleau-Ponty (1962, p. 369).

  17. Ibid., p. 369.

  18. Ibid., p. 370.

  19. See Gallagher and Marcel (1999).

  20. Clark and Chalmers (1998). Also see Clark (in press).

  21. Clark (1998); Wheeler (2005); Wheeler and Clark (1999).

  22. See Adams and Aizawa (2001).

  23. Dreyfus and Dreyfus (1985, 1986).

  24. Dewey (1896).

  25. Varela et al. (1991); Thompson and Varela (2001).

  26. Noë (2004).

  27. Ibid., p. 1.

  28. Ibid., p. 73.

  29. This is certainly the case across a number of disciplines that in the past have been highly influenced by cognitivist-computationalist approaches. See, e.g., Brooks (1991); Gallese (2000); Clancey (1991). The phenomenology of Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty has informed most of the philosophical accounts. See, e.g., Clark (1997); Dreyfus (1992); Gallagher (2005a); Gallagher and Varela (2003); Noë (2004); Sheets-Johnstone (1999b); Todes (2001); Varela et al. (1991); Wheeler (2005).

  30. Todes (2001); Noë (2004).

  31. Clark and Chalmers (1998).

  32. Ibid., p. 7 (my emphasis).

  33. Ibid., p. 8.

  34. Clark (1997, in press).

  35. Todes (2001). Todes’ book is actually his 1963 Harvard dissertation originally titled “The Human Body as Material Subject of the World.” In 1990 it was published for the first time, under its original title, as part of the Garland Press series of Harvard dissertations, which included the dissertations of Davidson, Goodman, Putnam, and Quine. In 2001 it was republished as Body and world, with a Foreword and Introduction by Hubert Dreyfus, and a second Introduction by Piotr Hoffman.

  36. Ibid., p. 2.

  37. Ibid., p. 3.

  38. Trevarthen and Hubley (1978). [Editor’s note: See also Beata Stawarska’s article, “Feeling good vibrations in dialogical relations,” in this issue.]

  39. E.g., Husserl (1966).

  40. Sartre (1956, p. 229).

  41. Husserl (1973a, p. 289). Cf. also Husserl (1968, p. 394; 1973b, p. 497).

  42. Sartre (1956, p. 255).

  43. Gurwitsch (1931/1978, pp. 35–36).

  44. Let me note here that Dreyfus himself has been influenced by Todes and Gurwitsch on these issues. Indeed, the same question about intersubjectivity that I am raising here can be raised in regard to Dreyfus’s account of expertise, an account which downplays the role of others. Harry Collins, for example, makes this critique. See Collins (1996, 2004). Also see Gallagher (2007); and Selinger (2003).

  45. Todes (2001, p. 2).

  46. See, e.g., Wheeler (2005). Wheeler makes good use of Heidegger’s concept of Mitsein to suggest that “a human being is world embedded only to the extent that she has been socialized into the set of practices and customs that define her culture …. Any talk of an individual’s subjective world can refer only to a secondary phenomenon, one that is dependent on a more fundamental, inherently social condition of cultural coembeddedness” (p. 149).

  47. See Gallagher (2005b).

  48. Noë (2004).

  49. Ibid., p. 60.

  50. Ibid., p. 63.

  51. Ibid., p. 23.

  52. Wheeler (2005, p. 197).

  53. For that reason we sometimes experience what I would call “Proustian effects” of intersubjectivity which may be deeply recessive in our perception of certain aspects of the world. It doesn’t happen all the time, but when I see the hammer (or some set of tools) the memory of my father may come explicitly to mind (because he and I built some things together many years ago). When it does not come explicitly to mind, however, that doesn’t mean that it is not there, with a certain emotional valence, working below the threshold, informing the perceptual significance of that hammer.

References

  • Adams, Frederick, and Kenneth Aizawa. 2001. The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology 14(1): 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Rodney. 1991. New approaches to robotics. Science 253: 1227–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buytendijk, F.J.J. 1974. Prolegomena to an anthropological physiology (trans: A.I. Orr). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

  • Chiel, Hillel J., and Randall D. Beer. 1997. The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends in Neurosciences 20: 553–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, William J. 1991. Situated cognition: Stepping out of representational flatland. AI Communications—The European Journal on Artificial Intelligence 4(2/3): 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andy. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andy. in press. Supersizing the mind: Reflections on embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Clark, Andy. 1998. Twisted tales: Causal complexity and cognitive scientific explanation. Minds and Machines 8: 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Harry M. 1996. Embedded or embodied: H. Dreyfus’s what computers still can’t do. Artificial Intelligence 80(1): 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Harry M. 2004. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3(2): 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1884. The new psychology. Andover Review 2: 278–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1896. The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3: 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1938. Logic: The theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart Dreyfus. 1985. From Socrates to expert systems: The limits of calculative rationality. In Philosophy and technology II: Information technology and computers in theory and practice, ed. Carl Mitcham and Alois Huning, 111–130. Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.

  • Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart Dreyfus. 1986. Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun. in press. Philosophical antecedents to situated cognition. In Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, ed. Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gallagher, Shaun. 2005a. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun. 2005b. Phenomenological contributions to a theory of social cognition. Husserl Studies 21: 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun. 2007. Moral agency, self-consciousness, and practical wisdom. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(5–6): 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun, and Anthony J. Marcel. 1999. The self in contextualized action. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(4): 4–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun, and Francisco J. Varela. 2003. Redrawing the map and resetting the time: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 29: 93–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, Vittorio. 2000. The acting subject: Towards the neural basis of social cognition. In Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions, ed. Thomas Metzinger, 325–333. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Gibson, J.J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch, Aron. 1931/1978. Human encounters in the social world. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1968. Being and time (trans: John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson). New York: Harper & Row.

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1966. Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Husserliana XI. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1968. Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester. 1925, ed. Walter Biemel. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1973a. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil. 1921–28, ed. Iso Kern. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1973b. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil. 1929–35, ed. Iso Kern. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of perception (trans: Colin Smith). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard, Jacques. 2000. The neurobiological roots of rational thinking. In Prerational intelligence: Adaptive behavior and intelligent systems without symbols and logic, vol. I, ed. Holk Cruse, Jeffrey Dean, and Helge Ritter, 343–355. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Sandman, C.A. 1986. Cardiac afferent influences on consciousness. In Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 1, ed. Richard J. Davidson, Gary E. Schwartz and David Shapiro, 55–85. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (trans: H.E. Barnes). NY: Philosophical Library.

  • Selinger, Evan. 2003. The necessity of embodiment: The Dreyfus–Collins debate. Philosophy Today 47(3): 266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 1999a. Emotion and movement: A beginning empirical-phenomenological analysis of their relationship. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(11–12): 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 1999b. The primacy of movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, Erwin. 1966. Philosophical psychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Evan, and Francisco J. Varela. 2001. Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(10): 418–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todes, Samuel. 2001. Body and world. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, Colwyn, and Penny Hubley. 1978. Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language, ed. Andrew Lock, 183–229. London: Academic Press.

  • Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Michael. 2005. Reconstructing the cognitive world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Michael, and Andy Clark. 1999. Genetic representation: Reconciling content and causal complexity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50(1): 103–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, Felix E. 1993. Muscle coordination of movement: A perspective. Journal of Biomechanics 26(suppl 1): 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun Gallagher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallagher, S. Intersubjectivity in perception. Cont Philos Rev 41, 163–178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-008-9075-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-008-9075-8

Keywords

Navigation