Abstract
The embodied, embedded, enactive, and extended approaches to cognition explicate many important details for a phenomenology of perception, and are consistent with some of the traditional phenomenological analyses. Theorists working in these areas, however, often fail to provide an account of how intersubjectivity might relate to perception. This paper suggests some ways in which intersubjectivity is important for an adequate account of perception.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Straus (1966, p. 138).
Gibson (1979).
Paillard (2000).
Chiel and Beer (1997).
Zajac (1993).
Clark (1997).
Chiel and Beer (1997, p. 554).
Gallagher (2005a).
See Gallagher (in press), for a fuller account of the philosophical roots of the situated cognition idea.
Dewey (1884, p. 280).
Dewey (1938, p. 67).
Wheeler (2005) gives a good account of Heidegger in this context.
Heidegger (1968, p. 95).
Ibid., pp. 86–90.
Merleau-Ponty (1962, p. 369).
Ibid., p. 369.
Ibid., p. 370.
See Gallagher and Marcel (1999).
See Adams and Aizawa (2001).
Dewey (1896).
Noë (2004).
Ibid., p. 1.
Ibid., p. 73.
This is certainly the case across a number of disciplines that in the past have been highly influenced by cognitivist-computationalist approaches. See, e.g., Brooks (1991); Gallese (2000); Clancey (1991). The phenomenology of Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty has informed most of the philosophical accounts. See, e.g., Clark (1997); Dreyfus (1992); Gallagher (2005a); Gallagher and Varela (2003); Noë (2004); Sheets-Johnstone (1999b); Todes (2001); Varela et al. (1991); Wheeler (2005).
Clark and Chalmers (1998).
Ibid., p. 7 (my emphasis).
Ibid., p. 8.
Todes (2001). Todes’ book is actually his 1963 Harvard dissertation originally titled “The Human Body as Material Subject of the World.” In 1990 it was published for the first time, under its original title, as part of the Garland Press series of Harvard dissertations, which included the dissertations of Davidson, Goodman, Putnam, and Quine. In 2001 it was republished as Body and world, with a Foreword and Introduction by Hubert Dreyfus, and a second Introduction by Piotr Hoffman.
Ibid., p. 2.
Ibid., p. 3.
Trevarthen and Hubley (1978). [Editor’s note: See also Beata Stawarska’s article, “Feeling good vibrations in dialogical relations,” in this issue.]
E.g., Husserl (1966).
Sartre (1956, p. 229).
Sartre (1956, p. 255).
Gurwitsch (1931/1978, pp. 35–36).
Let me note here that Dreyfus himself has been influenced by Todes and Gurwitsch on these issues. Indeed, the same question about intersubjectivity that I am raising here can be raised in regard to Dreyfus’s account of expertise, an account which downplays the role of others. Harry Collins, for example, makes this critique. See Collins (1996, 2004). Also see Gallagher (2007); and Selinger (2003).
Todes (2001, p. 2).
See, e.g., Wheeler (2005). Wheeler makes good use of Heidegger’s concept of Mitsein to suggest that “a human being is world embedded only to the extent that she has been socialized into the set of practices and customs that define her culture …. Any talk of an individual’s subjective world can refer only to a secondary phenomenon, one that is dependent on a more fundamental, inherently social condition of cultural coembeddedness” (p. 149).
See Gallagher (2005b).
Noë (2004).
Ibid., p. 60.
Ibid., p. 63.
Ibid., p. 23.
Wheeler (2005, p. 197).
For that reason we sometimes experience what I would call “Proustian effects” of intersubjectivity which may be deeply recessive in our perception of certain aspects of the world. It doesn’t happen all the time, but when I see the hammer (or some set of tools) the memory of my father may come explicitly to mind (because he and I built some things together many years ago). When it does not come explicitly to mind, however, that doesn’t mean that it is not there, with a certain emotional valence, working below the threshold, informing the perceptual significance of that hammer.
References
Adams, Frederick, and Kenneth Aizawa. 2001. The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology 14(1): 43–64.
Brooks, Rodney. 1991. New approaches to robotics. Science 253: 1227–1232.
Buytendijk, F.J.J. 1974. Prolegomena to an anthropological physiology (trans: A.I. Orr). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Chiel, Hillel J., and Randall D. Beer. 1997. The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends in Neurosciences 20: 553–557.
Clancey, William J. 1991. Situated cognition: Stepping out of representational flatland. AI Communications—The European Journal on Artificial Intelligence 4(2/3): 109–112.
Clark, Andy. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, Andy. in press. Supersizing the mind: Reflections on embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, Andy. 1998. Twisted tales: Causal complexity and cognitive scientific explanation. Minds and Machines 8: 79–99.
Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 7–19.
Collins, Harry M. 1996. Embedded or embodied: H. Dreyfus’s what computers still can’t do. Artificial Intelligence 80(1): 99–117.
Collins, Harry M. 2004. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3(2): 125–143.
Dewey, John. 1884. The new psychology. Andover Review 2: 278–289.
Dewey, John. 1896. The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3: 357–370.
Dewey, John. 1938. Logic: The theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart Dreyfus. 1985. From Socrates to expert systems: The limits of calculative rationality. In Philosophy and technology II: Information technology and computers in theory and practice, ed. Carl Mitcham and Alois Huning, 111–130. Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart Dreyfus. 1986. Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
Gallagher, Shaun. in press. Philosophical antecedents to situated cognition. In Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, ed. Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, Shaun. 2005a. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, Shaun. 2005b. Phenomenological contributions to a theory of social cognition. Husserl Studies 21: 95–110.
Gallagher, Shaun. 2007. Moral agency, self-consciousness, and practical wisdom. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(5–6): 199–223.
Gallagher, Shaun, and Anthony J. Marcel. 1999. The self in contextualized action. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(4): 4–30.
Gallagher, Shaun, and Francisco J. Varela. 2003. Redrawing the map and resetting the time: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 29: 93–132.
Gallese, Vittorio. 2000. The acting subject: Towards the neural basis of social cognition. In Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions, ed. Thomas Metzinger, 325–333. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibson, J.J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gurwitsch, Aron. 1931/1978. Human encounters in the social world. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1968. Being and time (trans: John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson). New York: Harper & Row.
Husserl, Edmund. 1966. Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Husserliana XI. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, Edmund. 1968. Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester. 1925, ed. Walter Biemel. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, Edmund. 1973a. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil. 1921–28, ed. Iso Kern. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, Edmund. 1973b. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil. 1929–35, ed. Iso Kern. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of perception (trans: Colin Smith). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Paillard, Jacques. 2000. The neurobiological roots of rational thinking. In Prerational intelligence: Adaptive behavior and intelligent systems without symbols and logic, vol. I, ed. Holk Cruse, Jeffrey Dean, and Helge Ritter, 343–355. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sandman, C.A. 1986. Cardiac afferent influences on consciousness. In Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 1, ed. Richard J. Davidson, Gary E. Schwartz and David Shapiro, 55–85. New York: Plenum Press.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (trans: H.E. Barnes). NY: Philosophical Library.
Selinger, Evan. 2003. The necessity of embodiment: The Dreyfus–Collins debate. Philosophy Today 47(3): 266–279.
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 1999a. Emotion and movement: A beginning empirical-phenomenological analysis of their relationship. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(11–12): 259–277.
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 1999b. The primacy of movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Straus, Erwin. 1966. Philosophical psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Thompson, Evan, and Francisco J. Varela. 2001. Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(10): 418–425.
Todes, Samuel. 2001. Body and world. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Trevarthen, Colwyn, and Penny Hubley. 1978. Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language, ed. Andrew Lock, 183–229. London: Academic Press.
Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wheeler, Michael. 2005. Reconstructing the cognitive world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wheeler, Michael, and Andy Clark. 1999. Genetic representation: Reconciling content and causal complexity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50(1): 103–135.
Zajac, Felix E. 1993. Muscle coordination of movement: A perspective. Journal of Biomechanics 26(suppl 1): 109–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallagher, S. Intersubjectivity in perception. Cont Philos Rev 41, 163–178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-008-9075-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-008-9075-8