Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Staying under the radar: constraints on labour agency of pineapple plantation workers in Costa Rica?

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plantation workers have seemingly little opportunities for labour agency, defined as the worker’s ability to act and improve their conditions. In response to a call for a better understanding of the horizontal dimension shaping labour agency, this article questions what local factors determine the worker’s ability to act by analysing the institutional constraints embedded in the national context through a mixed methods approach. A combination of qualitative and quantitative data is used to understand what shapes and constrains the potential for labour agency in the case of plantation workers in the pineapple sector of Costa Rica. We provide new empirical evidence of the relation between the local opportunity structure—proxied by perceived job security and union awareness—and labour agency in terms of a worker’s intention to choose forthright (voice), evasive (exit) or repressed (loyalty) actions. The model results indicate that a lack of job security and a lack of union awareness significantly reduce the likelihood to use forthright actions (such as voicing concerns, striking or joining a union) compared to evasive (such as leaving the job) or repressed actions (such as doing nothing). In addition, the qualitative analysis of the local opportunity structure identifies four institutional constraints: weak employment protection, vulnerability of migrant workers, limited workers’ representation and insufficient labour law enforcement. Besides overcoming these institutional constraints, empowering workers to make their voices heard also requires awareness raising about their collective bargaining rights and more job security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In terms of export value it increased from US$ 58 million in 1995 to US$ 940,7 million in 2017. It became the second largest national export sector (9% of total exports) after bananas (10%) (PROCOMER 2018).

  2. According to the Labour Ministry, 28% of the agricultural workers in the Huetar Norte region are not covered by social security.

  3. We identified the following unions in the region: SITRASEP, SITAGAH and SINTRAPEM (COSIBA-CR), SITRAP, UNT, SINTRAPIFRUT (SINTRASTAFCOR).

  4. A SWOT-analysis examines the internal Strengths and Weaknesses and the external Opportunities and Threats to an organisation.

  5. The potential instrumental variables we tested include: share of permanent contracts in the region, worker received training, parents who also work in the pineapple sector, intention to move to another region for living in the future, and distance to the plantation. Yet, none of these passed the statistical rigour test.

  6. The unionisation rate largely differs between private and public sector (respectively less than 1% vs. 30% unionised workers) (OECD 2017).

  7. The percentage of unionised workers in the banana industry fell from 90 in 1982 to 5% in 1987.

  8. According to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), MLM 1 is preferred because it has the lowest value compared with the other models. AIC and BIC are measures for comparing the quality of a model relative to other models. The model with the lowest score is preferred.

Abbreviations

AIC:

Akaike Information Criterion

BIC:

Bayesian Information Criterion

GPN:

Global Production Network

GVC:

Global Value Chain

IIA:

Irrelevant Independent Alternatives

ILO:

International Labour Organization

LR:

Likelihood Ratio

MLM:

Multinomial Logit Model

MPM:

Multinomial Probit Model

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

CANAPEP:

National Chamber of Pineapple Producers and Exporters

SWOT:

Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats

References

  • Acuña, G. 2009. La actividad piñera en Costa Rica: De la producción a la expansión. Principales características, impactos, retos y desafíos. San José: DITSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acuña, G. 2011. Flujos migratorios laborales intrarregionales: Situación actual, retos y oportunidades en Centroamérica y República Dominicana—Informe Costa Rica. San José: OIM, OIT, MTSS, CECC SICA, Red de observatorio del Mercado Laboral.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, M., S. Barrientos, and M. Visser. 2017. Multi-scalar labour agency in global production networks: Contestation and crisis in the South African fruit sector. Development and Change 48 (4): 721–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, R., M. Bertelsen, and J. Holland. 2007. Empowerment in practice: From analysis to implementation. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J., and B. Siim. 2004. Introduction: The politics of inclusion and empowerment: Gender, class and citizenship. In The politics of inclusion and empowerment: Gender, class and citizenship, ed. J. Andersen and B. Siim, 1–18. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni, E. 2018. Labour control and the labour question in global production networks: Exploitation and disciplining in Senegalese export horticulture. Journal of Economic Geography 18 (1): 111–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barquero, M. 2015. Gobierno aplaza multas por tener empleados migrantes ilegales. La Nación, 6 December. https://www.nacion.com/economia/agro/gobierno-aplaza-multas-por-tener-empleados-migrantes-ilegales/4SZJWHPEERHMFJBKV55T2YNRZM/story/. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.

  • Barrientos, S., G. Gereffi, and A. Rossi. 2011. Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. International Labour Review 150 (3–4): 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, S., and A. Kritzinger. 2004. Squaring the circle: Global production and the informalization of work in South African fruit exports. Journal of International Development 16 (1): 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, S., and S. Smith. 2007. Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly 28 (4): 713–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, T., and N. Egels-Zandén. 2016. Beyond decoupling: Unions and the leveraging of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. Socio-Economic Review 14 (2): 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berntson, E., K. Näswall, and M. Sverke. 2010. The moderating role of employability in the association between job insecurity and exit, voice, loyalty and neglect. Economic and Industrial Democracy 31 (2): 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carswell, G., and G. De Neve. 2013. Labouring for global markets: Conceptualising labour agency in global production networks. Geoforum 44: 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, M. 2017. La reforma procesal laboral de Costa Rica. Guía para los trabajadores y las trabajadoras. San José: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N.M. 2012. Geographies of production III: Making space for labour. Progress in Human Geography 37 (2): 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N.M., and M. Hess. 2013. Global production networks, labour and development. Geoforum 44: 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N.M., and D. Jordhus-Lier. 2011. Constrained agency? Reevaluating the geographies of labour. Progress in Human Geography 35 (2): 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cradden, C., and J.C. Graz. 2016. Is transnational private regulation potentially an effective means of promoting collective industrial relations? Global Labour Journal 7 (1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumbers, A., C. Nativel, and P. Routledge. 2008. Labour agency and union positionalities in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 8 (3): 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N., and J. Merk. 2014. Private regulation and trade union rights: Why codes of conduct have limited impact on trade union rights. Journal of Business Ethics 123 (3): 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT. 2018. Crop statistics database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QC. Accessed 8 Sept 2018.

  • Farrell, D. 1983. Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. The Academy of Management Journal 26 (4): 596–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frundt, H.J. 2002. Central American unions in the era of globalization. Latin American Research Review 37 (3): 7–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansemans, A. 2019. Beyond the low-hanging fruit: Worker empowerment in Costa Rica-EU pineapple trade. Ghent, Belgium: PhD thesis, Ghent University.

  • Graz, J.C., N. Helmerich, and C. Prébandier. 2019. Hybrid production regimes and labor agency in transnational private governance. Journal of Business Ethics.

  • Guevara, A., R. Arce, and P. Guevara. 2017. Economic, social and environmental impact of pineapple farming in Costa Rica. San José: Central American Institute of Business Administration (INCAE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. 2017. Paradoxes of the border: Labor shortages and farmworker minor agency in reworking California’s strawberry fields. Economic Geography 93 (1): 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J., and D. McFadden. 1984. Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica 52 (5): 1219–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedeker, D. 2003. A mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine 22 (9): 1433–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1970. Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, P. 2007. Agricultural workers and their contribution to sustainable agriculture and rural development. Rome: FAO-ILO-IUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2018. Report VI Social dialogue and tripartism. 107th Session of the International Labour Conference. http://www.ilo.org/ilc/ILCSessions/107/reports/reports-to-the-conference/WCMS_624015/lang–en/index.htm. Accessed 12 July 2018.

  • ILO. 2010. CEARC, NORMLEX Right to organise and collective bargaining convention, 1949 (No. 98)—Costa Rica. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13101:0::NO:13101:P13101_COMMENT_ID:3300840. Accessed 8 Oct 2018.

  • Koçer, R.G., and L. Fransen. 2009. Codes of conduct and the promise of a change of climate in worker organization. European Journal of Industrial Relations 15 (3): 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. 2010. Unpacking the packing plant: Nicaraguan migrant women’s work in Costa Rica’s evolving export agriculture sector. Signs 35 (2): 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louche, C., L. Staelens, and M. D’Haese. 2018. When workplace unionism in global value chains does not function well: Exploring the impediments. Journal of Business Ethics.

  • Lund-Thomsen, P. 2013. Labor agency in the football manufacturing industry of Sialkot, Pakistan. Geoforum 44: 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P., and N.M. Coe. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and labour agency: The case of Nike in Pakistan. Journal of Economic Geography 15 (2): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merk, J. 2009. Jumping scale and bridging space in the era of corporate social responsibility: Cross-border labour struggles in the global garment industry. Third World Quarterly 30 (3): 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, A. 2012. Migraciones y derechos laborales en Centroamérica: Características de las personas migrantes y de los mercados de trabajo. San José: FLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E.W. 2014. Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1 (1): 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MTSS. 2013. La población extranjera en Costa Rica: Principales actividades económicas y ocupaciones. San José: MTSS/OML/OIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, J., and B. Pritchard. 2009. Value chain struggles: Institutions and governance in the plantation districts of South India. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T.W.H., and D.C. Feldman. 2012. Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior 33 (2): 216–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2017. OECD Reviews of labour market and social policies: Costa Rica. San José: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oseland, S.E., H. Haarstad, and A. Fløysand. 2012. Labor agency and the importance of the national scale: Emergent aquaculture unionism in Chile. Political Geography 31 (2): 94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattenden, J. 2016. Working at the margins of global production networks: Local labour control regimes and rural-based labourers in South India. Third World Quarterly 37 (10): 1809–1833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T.M., and T.L. Brubaker. 2001. The effects of job insecurity on employee safety outcomes: Cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 6 (2): 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PROCOMER. 2018. Estadísticas de Comercio Exterior Costa Rica 2017. Promotora del Comercio Exterior de Costa Rica (PROCOMER). https://procomer.com/downloads/estudios/estudio_estadistico_2017/Estadisticas2017.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2019.

  • Pye, O. 2017. A plantation precariat: Fragmentation and organizing potential in the palm oil global production network. Development and Change 48 (5): 942–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. 2014. Fairtrade, certification, and labor: Global and local tensions in improving conditions for agricultural workers. Agriculture and Human Values 31 (3): 499–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard, L. 2005. International framework agreements: A new model for securing workers rights? British Journal of Industrial Relations 44 (4): 707–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard, L., and N. Hammer. 2011. Prospects for labour in global value chains: Labour standards in the cut flower and banana industries. British Journal of Industrial Relations 49 (1): 168–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard, L., and O. Okinda. 2018. Changing labour power on smallholder tea farms in Kenya. Competition & Change 22 (1): 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, J.A. 2008. A history of organized labor in Panama and Central America. Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P.K. 2010. Responsible retailing: The practice of CSR in banana plantations in Costa Rica. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2): 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, J., and O. Vargas. 2014. Informe tecnico gira in situ a piñeras de San Carlos y Grecia Febrero 2014. San José: Departamento de Migraciones Laborales MTSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rye, J.F., and J. Andrzejewska. 2010. The structural disempowerment of Eastern European migrant farm workers in Norwegian agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 26 (1): 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said-Allsopp, M., and A. Tallontire. 2015. Pathways to empowerment? Dynamics of women’s participation in global value chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 107: 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawchuk, D. 2004. The Costa Rican catholic church, social justice, and the rights of workers, 19791996. Canadian corporation for studies in religion editions SR. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

  • Schreurs, B., H. Guenter, I.M. Jawahar, and N. De Cuyper. 2015. Speaking up when feeling job insecure: The moderating role of punishment and reward sensitivity. Journal of Organizational Change Management 28 (6): 1107–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, M., and M. Maertens. 2017. Worker empowerment through private standards: Evidence from the Peruvian horticultural export sector. The Journal of Development Studies 53 (4): 618–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, B. 2009. Labour flexibility in export horticulture: A case study of northeast Brazilian grape production. Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (4): 761–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda, J.M., and P. Frías. 2007. El sindicalismo en América Central: Desafíos del futuro a la luz de su memoria histórica. Guía didáctica. San José: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoss, M.K. 2017. Job insecurity: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management 43 (6): 1911–1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staelens, L., S. Desiere, C. Louche, and M. D’Haese. 2018. Predicting job satisfaction and workers’ intentions to leave at the bottom of the high value agricultural chain: Evidence from the Ethiopian cut flower industry. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 29 (9): 1609–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverke, M., and S. Goslinga. 2003. The consequences of job insecurity for employers and unions: Exit, voice and loyalty. Economic and Industrial Democracy 24 (2): 241–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverke, M., and J. Hellgren. 2001. Exit, voice and loyalty reactions to job insecurity in Sweden: Do unionized and non-unionized employees differ? British Journal of Industrial Relations 39 (2): 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverke, M., J. Hellgren, and K. Näswall. 2002. No security: A meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 7 (3): 242–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallontire, A., M. Opondo, V. Nelson, and A. Martin. 2011. Beyond the vertical? Using value chains and governance as a framework to analyse private standards initiatives in agri-food chains. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (3): 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. 2002. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vagneron, I., G. Faure, and D. Loeillet. 2009. Is there a pilot in the chain? Identifying the key drivers of change in the fresh pineapple sector. Food Policy 34 (5): 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorend, K., and F. Robles. 2011. Migrando en la crisis: La fuerza de trabajo inmigrante en la economía costarricense en los sectores de la construcción, agricultura y transporte público. San José: OIM-AECID-MTSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorend, K., F. Rivera, K. Venegas, and L.A. Oviedo. 2013. Nicaragüenses en el Norte: Condiciones laborales y prácticas de contratación de hombres y mujeres migrantes en la Región Huetar Norte. San José: ILO, Decent Work Technical Support Team and Country Office for Central America.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the constructive comments received on earlier versions of this paper from Katharina Krumbiegel and the participants of the IAAE Conference in Vancouver in 2018 and the EAAE PhD workshop in Barcelona in 2017. The feedback of the anonymous reviewers helped us to redesign the conceptual framework. We would also like to thank the enumerators and all respondents who took the time to participate in the study. The data collection would not have been possible without the logistical support of the Centro de Desarrollo Rural (CDR) and the partner universities in Costa Rica  to whom we owe a great debt of gratitude. The study was funded by a Special Research Fund (BOF) of Ghent University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marijke D’Haese.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Table 4 Means, standard deviations and correlation matrix of variables
Table 5 Cross tabulation of perceived job security by contract type
Table 6 Cross tabulation of perceived labour agency by perceived job security
Table 7 Cross tabulation of perceived labour agency by union awareness

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gansemans, A., D’Haese, M. Staying under the radar: constraints on labour agency of pineapple plantation workers in Costa Rica?. Agric Hum Values 37, 397–414 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09998-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09998-z

Keywords

Navigation