skip to main content
article

A Quantum Theory of Consciousness

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The relationship between quantum collapse and consciousness is reconsidered under the assumption that quantum collapse is an objective dynamical process. We argue that the conscious observer can have a distinct role from the physical measuring device during the process of quantum collapse owing to the intrinsic nature of consciousness; the conscious observer can know whether he is in a definite state or a quantum superposition of definite states, while the physical measuring device cannot "know". As a result, the consciousness observer can distinguish the definite states and their quantum superposition, while the physical measuring device without consciousness cannot do. This provides a possible quantum physical method to distinguish man and machine. The new result also implies that consciousness has causal efficacies in the physical world when considering the existence of quantum collapse. Accordingly consciousness is not reducible or emergent, but a new fundamental property of matter. This may establish a quantum basis for panpsychism, and make it be a promising solution to the hard problem of consciousness. Furthermore, it is suggested that a unified theory of matter and consciousness includes two parts: one is the psychophysical principle or corresponding principle between conscious content and matter state, and the other is the complete quantum evolution of matter state, which includes the definite nonlinear evolution element introduced by consciousness and relating to conscious content. Lastly, some experimental schemes are presented to test the proposed quantum theory of consciousness.

References

  1. Adler, S. L., & Brun, T. A. (2001). Generalized stochastic Schrödinger equations for state vector collapse. Journal of Physics A, 34, 4797-4809.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bell, J. S. (1987). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis. New York: Scribner's.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Czachor, M. (1995). Nonlinear Schrödinger equation and two-level atoms. Preprint quant-ph/9501007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. DeWitt, B. S., & Graham, N. (Eds.), (1973). The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum theory as a universal physical theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 24, 1-41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Diosi, L. (1989). Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations. Physics Review A, 40, 1165-1174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Duane, T. D., & Behrendt, T. (1965). Extrasensory electroencephalographic induction between two identical twins. Science, 150, 367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Everett, H. (1957). Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics. Review of Modern Physics 29, 454- 462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fivel, D. I. (1997). Dynamical reduction theory of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations and a possible origin of CP violations. Physics Review A, 56, 146-156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gao, S. (2000). Quantum motion and superluminal communication. Beijing: Chinese Broadcasting & Television Publishing House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao, S. (2001). From quantum motion to classical motion-seeking the lost reality. Physics Essays, 14(1), 37-48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gao, S. (2003a). A possible quantum basis of panpsychism. NeuroQuantology, 1(1), 4-9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao, S. (2003b). Quantum. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao, S. (2004a). Quantum collapse, consciousness and superluminal communication. Foundation of Physics Letters, 17(2), 167-182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gao, S. (2004b). A possible connection between quantum and self-consciousness. Axiomathes: An International Journal in Ontology and Cognitive Systems, 14(4), 295-305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao, S. (2006a). What quantum mechanics really describes: Discontinuous motion of particles. Galilean Electrodynamics, 17(1), 3-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gao, S. (2006b). A model of wavefunction collapse in discrete space-time. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 45(10), 1943-1957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Gao, S. (2006c). Quantum motion: Unveiling the mysterious quantum world. Bury St Edmunds: Arima Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986). Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physics Review D, 34, 470-491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ghirardi, G. C., Pearle, P., & Rimini, A. (1990). A Continuous-spontaneous-reduction model involving gravity. Physics Review D, 42, 1057-1064.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hameroff, S. R., & Penrose, R. (1996). Conscious events as orchestrated space-time selections. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), 36-53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hughston, L. P. (1996). Geometry of stochastic state vector reduction. Proceedings af the Royal Society of London A, 452, 953-979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jahn, R. G., Dunne, B. J., Nelson, R. D., Dobyns, Y. H., & Bradish, G. J. (1997). Correlations of random binary sequences with pre-stated operator intention: A review of a 12-year program. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 11(3), 345-367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Libet, B. (1993). Neurophysiology of consciousness: Selected papers and new essays. Boston: Birkhauser.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. McGinn, C. (1999). The mysterious flame: Conscious minds in a material world. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearle, P. (1989). Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization. Physics Review A, 39, 2277-2289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Penrose, R. (1996). On gravity's role in quantum state reduction. General Relativity and Gravitation, 28, 581-600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Percival, I. C. (1994). Primary state diffusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 447, 189- 209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Radin, D. I. (1997). The conscious universe: The scientific truth of psychic phenomena. New York: HarperCollins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Radin, D. I., & Nelson, R. D. (1989). Evidence for consciousness-related anomalies in random physical systems. Foundations of Physics, 19(12), 1499-1514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Seager, W. (1999). Theories of consciousness. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Seager, W. (2001). Panpsychism, Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Stapp, H. (1996). Mind, matter, and quantum mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Strawson, G. (2006). Realistic monism: Why pbysicalism entails panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Strawson, G., et al. (2006). Consciousness and its place in nature: Does physicalism entail panpsychism? Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Targ, R., & Puthoff, H. (1974). Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding. Nuture, 252, 602-607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Tegmark, M. (2000). Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physics Review E, 61, 4194-4206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Wackermann, J., Seiter, C., Keibel, H., & Walach H. (2003). Correlations between brain electrical activities of two spatially separated human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 336, 60-64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Wigner, E. P. (1967). Symmetries and reflections. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, pp.171-184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Quantum Theory of Consciousness

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access