Abstract
It is a received view that superluminal signaling is prohibited in collapse theories of quantum mechanics. In this paper, I argue that this may be not the case. I propose two possible mechanisms of superluminal signaling in collapse theories. The first one is based on the well-accepted solution to the tails problem, and the second one is based on certain assumptions about the minds of observers. Finally, I also discuss how collapse theories can avoid such superluminal signaling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Bob can also receive the superluminal signal by looking at the devices in his lab if his observation of the result of a device does not further collapse the entangled superposition of the device significantly so that the superposition is still a result “1” state with the tail being the result “0” state, namely immediately after Bob’s observation of the result of a device the state of the whole composite system including Bob is close to the state \(\sqrt{p_0}\left| 0\right\rangle _S\left| 0\right\rangle _M\left| 0\right\rangle _B+e^{i\phi }\sqrt{p_1}\left| 1\right\rangle _S\left| 1\right\rangle _M\left| 1\right\rangle _B\) or \(\sqrt{p_0}\left| 0\right\rangle _S\left| 0\right\rangle _M\left| 0\right\rangle _B-e^{i\phi }\sqrt{p_1}\left| 1\right\rangle _S\left| 1\right\rangle _M\left| 1\right\rangle _B\). In this case, if Alice does not make her measurements, Bob will observe the result “1” for all devices, while if Alice makes her measurements, Bob will observe the result “0” for some devices.
This means that these two mechanisms of superluminal signaling are different from the mechanism of superluminal signaling in nonlinear quantum mechanics [2, 7, 8, 11]. Note also that such superluminal signaling is practically unrealizable due to either the extremely small tails or the extremely small possibility of the existence of general superpositions of different result states.
References
Albert, D.Z., Loewer, B.: Tails of Schrödinger’s Cat. In: Clifton, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)
Czachor, M.: Mobility and non-separability. Found. Phys. Lett. 4, 351–361 (1991)
Gao, S.: . Why we cannot see the tails of Schrödinger’s cat. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15438/ (2018)
Ghirardi, G.C., Bassi, A.: Collapse Theories, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/qm-collapse/ (2020)
Ghirardi, G.C., Grassi, R., Benatti, F.: Describing the macroscopic world: closing the circle within the dynamical reduction program. Foundations Phys. 25, 5–38 (1995)
Ghirardi, G.C., Grassi, R., Butterfield, J., Fleming, G.N.: Parameter dependence and outcome dependence in dynamical models for state vector reduction. Foundations Phys. 23, 341–364 (1993)
Gisin, N.: Stochastic quantum dynamics and relativity. Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 363–371 (1989)
Gisin, N.: Weinberg’s non-linear quantum mechanics and superluminal communications. Phys. Lett. A 143, 1–2 (1990)
McQueen, K.J.: Four tails problems for dynamical collapse theories. Stud. History Philos. Modern Phys. 49, 10–18 (2015)
Monton, B.: The problem of ontology for spontaneous collapse theories. Stud. History Philos. Modern Phys. 35, 407–421 (2004)
Polchinski, J.: Weinberg’s nonlinear quantum mechanics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 397–400 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, S. Is Superluminal Signaling Possible in Collapse Theories of Quantum Mechanics?. Found Phys 53, 87 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-023-00729-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-023-00729-3