Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Eugenic World Building and Disability: The Strange World of Kazuo Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A crucial challenge for critical disability studies is developing an argument for why disabled people should inhabit our democratic, shared public sphere. The ideological and material separation of citizens into worthy and unworthy based on physiological variations imagined as immutable differences is what I call eugenic world building. It is justified by the idea that social improvement and freedom of choice require eliminating devalued human traits in the interest of reducing human suffering, increasing life quality, and building a more desirable citizenry. In this essay, I outline the logic of inclusive and eugenic world building, define and explain the role of the "normate" in eugenic logic, and provide a critical disability studies reading of the 2005 novel Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro and its 2010 film adaptation. I argue that the ways of being in the world we think of as disabilities must be understood as the natural variations, abilities, and limitations inherent in human embodiment. When this happens, disability will be understood not as a problem to be eliminated but, rather, as a valid way of being in the world that must be accommodated through a sustaining and sustainable environment designed to afford access for a wide range of human variations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W. and Max Horkheimer. 2002. “The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception.” In Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, translated by Edmund Jephcott, edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, 94-136. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Agar, Nicholas. 2004. Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, Loius. 1972. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by Ben Brewster, 127-86. New York: Monthly Review Press.

  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328. 1991. http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.pdf.

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1965. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynton, Douglas C. 1996. Forbidden Signs: American Culture and the Campaign Against Sign Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Black, Edwin. 2003. War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinius, Harry. 2006. Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America's Quest for Racial Purity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler. 2000. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burleigh, Michael. 1994. Death and Deliverance: Euthanasia in Germany 1900-1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogdell, Christina. 2004. Eugenic Design: Streamlining America in the 1930s. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Lennard. 1995. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Carl. 2003. Better Than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, Henry. 1995. The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Francis. 1883. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. London: MacMillan and Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Disability in American Literature and Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2005. “Dares to Stare: Disabled Women Performance Artists and the Dynamics of Staring.” In Bodies in Commotion: Disability and Performance, edited by Carrie Sandhal and Philip Auslander, 30-41. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • ——. 2009. Staring: How We Look. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

  • ——. 2011. "Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept." Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 26 (3): 591-609.

  • ——. 2012. “The Case for Conserving Disability.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (3): 339-55.

  • ——. 2015a. “Human Biodiversity Conservation: A Consensual Ethical Principle.” American Journal of Bioethics 15 (6): 13-15.

  • ——. 2015b. “A Habitable World: Harriet McBryde Johnson’s ‘Case for My Life,’” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 30 (1): 300-06.

  • Gilman, Sander. 1995. Health and Illness: Images of Difference. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1998. Creating Beauty to Cure the Soul: Race and Psychology in the Shaping of Aesthetic Surgery. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Mark H. 1984. Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamraie, Aimi. 2012. “Proximate and Peripheral: Discourses of Space and Vulnerability Surrounding the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” In The Politics of Space and Place, edited by Chiara Certomá, Nicola Clewer, and Doug Elsey, 145-171. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. John. 2005. “Clone Alone.” The Guardian, February 25. Accessed June 24, 2013. http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/feb/26/bookerprize2005.bookerprize

  • Hasia, Marouf A. 1996. The Rhetoric of Eugenics in Anglo-American Thought. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberer, Patricia. 2001. “‘Exitus Heute in Hadamar’: The Hadamar Facility and ‘Euthanasia’ Policy in National Socialist Germany.” PhD diss., University of Maryland at College Park.

  • Hoche, Alfred and Karl Binding. 1920. The Authorization for the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life [Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens]. Leipzig: Verlag Von Felix Meiner.

  • Hubbard, Ruth. 2006. “Abortion and Disability: Who Should and Should Not Inhabit the World.” In The Disability Studies Reader. 2nd Ed., edited by Lennard J. Davis, 93-104. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvistendahl, Mara. 2011. Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys Over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro, Kazuo. 2005. Never Let Me Go. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Sarah. 2005. “‘Never Let me Go’: When They Were Orphans.” The New York Times Sunday Book Review, April 17. Accessed July 13, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/17/books/review/17KERRL.html

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip. 1996. The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution in Human Possibilities. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, Stefan. 1994. The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, Paul. 2008. Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, The Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, Georg. (1923) 1972. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, translated by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  • Mairs, Nancy. 1996. Waist-High in the World: A Life among the Nondisabled. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl. (1936) 1955. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, translated by Louis Wirth and Edward Shils. San Diego: Harvest Books.

  • Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels. (1923) 1970. The German Ideology, edited by C. J. Arthur. New York: International Publishers.

  • Menand, Louis. 2005. “Something About Kathy: Ishiguro’s Quasi-Science-Fiction Novel.” The New Yorker, March 28. Accessed July 13, 2012. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/03/28/050328crbo_books1?currentPage=all

  • Mitchell, David and Sharon Snyder. 2003. "The Eugenic Atlantic: Race, Disability, and the Making of an International Eugenic Science, 1800–1945." Disability & Society 18 (7): 843-864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Hill, Benno. 1998. Murderous Science: Elimination by Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others in Germany, 1933-1945. Woodbury, NY: Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parens, Erik. 2005. “Authenticity and Ambivalence: Toward Understanding the Enhancement Debate." Hastings Center Report 35 (3): 34-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2006. Surgically Shaping Children: Technology, Ethics, and the Pursuit of Normality. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Parens, Erik and Adrienne Asch. 2007. “The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections and Recommendations.” In Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, edited by Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch, 3-43. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, John. 1994. Children of Choice: Freedom and New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanek, Mark, dir. 2010. Never Let Me Go. Fox Searchlight Pictures.

  • Rose, Nikolas. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael. 2007. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, Marsha. 1998. "Disability Rights and Selective Abortion." In Abortion Wars: A Half Century of Struggle (1950-2000), edited by Ricky Solinger, 374-93. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, Jackie Leach. 2008. “Disability and Genetics in the Age of Genomic Medicine.” Nature Reviews Genetics 9 (10): 797-802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shklovsky, Viktor. (1917) 1990. “Art as Device.” In Theory of Prose, translated by Benjamin Sher, 1-14. Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.

  • Stacy, Robert H. 1977. Defamiliarization in Language and Literature. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson-Jones, Katherine. 2009. “Formalism.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, edited by Paisley Livingstone and Carl Plantinga, 131-141. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Yi Fu. (1977) 2001. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. 25th Anniversary Ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • United Nations General Assembly. 2007. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol, A/RES/61/106, January 24. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.

  • Weber, Max. (1905) 2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Routledge.

  • Weisman, Leslie Kanes. 1981. “Woman's Environmental Rights: A Manifesto.” Heresies: A Feminist Publication on Art and Politics 3: 6-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Rosemarie Garland-Thomson

Authors
  1. Rosemarie Garland-Thomson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemarie Garland-Thomson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garland-Thomson, R. Eugenic World Building and Disability: The Strange World of Kazuo Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go . J Med Humanit 38, 133–145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-015-9368-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-015-9368-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation