Skip to main content

Alternative Gotteskonzepte

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Analytische Religionsphilosophie
  • 1601 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Alternative Gotteskonzepte gibt es viele. Im Grunde ist jedes Gotteskonzept eine Alternative für andere Gotteskonzepte. Die Frage nach alternativen Gotteskonzepten ist somit eine Frage der Perspektive. In der gegenwärtigen analytischen Religionsphilosophie werden unter dem Begriff ›alternative Gotteskonzepte‹ Gottesvorstellungen zusammengefasst, die sich implizit oder explizit von dem in der Diskussion vorherrschenden christlich inspirierten theistischen Gottesbegriff abheben. Die Ausgangsperspektive ist also der durch die westlich-christlich geprägte Tradition theistische Gottesbegriff, während Abweichungen davon als alternative Gottesbegriffe gelten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Bishop, John: Can There Be Alternative Concepts of God? In: Nous 32/2 (1998), 174–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, John/Perszyk, Ken: Concepts of God and Problems of Evil. In: Buckareff, Andrei/Nagasawa, Yujin (Hg.): Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford 2016, 106–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, John/Perszyk, Ken: The Divine Attributes and Nonpersonal Conceptions of God. In: Topoi 36 (2017), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9394-z.

  • Draper, Paul/Schellenberg, J. L. (Hg.): Renewing Philosophy of Religion. Oxford 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, James: The power of humility in sceptical religion: why Ietsism is preferable to J. L. Schellenberg’s Ultimism. In: Religious Studies 53 (2017), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412515000475.

  • Forrest, Peter: Developmental Theism: From Pure Will to Unbounded Love. Oxford 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leftow, Brian (2016): Naturalistic Pantheism. In: Buckareff, Andrei/Nagasawa, Yujin (Hg.): Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford 2016, 64–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, John: The theory that the world exists because it should. In: American Philosophical Quarterly 7/4 (1970), 286–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, John: Universes. London 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, John: Infinite Minds. Oxford 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, John: A way of picturing God.‹ Alternative Concepts of God. In: Buckareff, Andrei/Nagasawa, Yujin (Hg.): Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: 2016, 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löffler, Winfried: Die Attribute Gottes. In: Schrenk, Markus (Hg.): Handbuch Metaphysik. Stuttgart 2017, 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.: The miracle of theism: Arguments for and against the existence of god. Oxford 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitzen, Stephen: Against Ultimacy. In: Draper, Paul/Schellenberg, J. L. (Hg.): Renewing Philosophy of Religion. Oxford 2017, 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord Adams, Marilyn: Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Ithaca 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, Tim: Purpose in the Universe. Oxford 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek: Why does the universe exist? The Harvard Review of Philosophy (Spring 1991), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas: Axiogenesis: An Essay in Metaphysical Optimalism. Lanham 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, John: Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion. Ithaca 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, John: The Wisdom to Doubt. Ithaca 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, John: God for All Time. From Theism to Ultimism. In: Buckareff, Andrei/Nagasawa, Yujin (Hg.): Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford 2016, 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer-Landau, Russ: Moral Realism. A Defence. Oxford 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, Richard: The Coherence of Theism. Oxford 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, Richard: The Existence of God. Oxford 22004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetens, Holm: Gott denken. Versuch über eine rationale Theologie. Stuttgart 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas: Inquiring about God, Bd. 1. Selected Essays. Hg. von Terence Cuneo. Cambridge 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas: The God We Worship: An exploration of liturgical theology. Grand Rapids 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gasser, G. (2019). Alternative Gotteskonzepte. In: Viertbauer, K., Gasser, G. (eds) Handbuch Analytische Religionsphilosophie. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04735-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04735-9_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04734-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04735-9

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics