Abstract
Valentin Asmus made a significant contribution to the formation of key interpretations, analyses and evaluations of Immanuel Kant’s work in the Russian-Soviet tradition of studying the “history of foreign philosophy”. This article shows precisely which principles and developmental models Asmus laid down in his interpretation of the transcendental dialectic section of Kant’s philosophical system. The article attempts to show that in his reading of Kant, Asmus actively relies on Hegel’s philosophical legacy, namely, on his theory of dialectics, the ontological status of contradiction and the highly significant role of “error” in the formation and advancement of knowledge. Asmus reads Kant through the lens of Hegel’s philosophy and adheres to Hegelian philosophy as a benchmark of fidelity and heuristics, as a canon and organon, through which Kant’s thought should be evaluated. Pursuing this path, he notes the significant progress of Kant’s thought compared to the metaphysical philosophy of previous centuries, but points out the insufficiency of Kant’s determination to fully think through contradictions ontologically and dialectically. Kant confines himself to pointing out the natural origin of the principle of “appearance” in the limits of reason, but is not ready to revise the foundations of classical logic, where any contradictions should be avoided. As a consequence, he settles on the epistemological interpretation of contradiction seeing it as an error of reason, albeit a natural one, leaving Asmus deeply disenchanted with his Hegelian expectations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asmus, Valentin 1924. Dialekticheskiy materializm i logika. In Ocherk pazvitiya dialekticheskogo metoda v noveyshey filosofii ot Kanta do Lenina, 220–225, Kyiv: Sorabkop.
Asmus, Valentin 1929. Dialektika Kanta. Moscow: Kommunisticheskoy Akademii.
Asmus, Valentin 1957. Filosofiya Immanuila Kanta. Moscow: Znanie.
Asmus, Valentin 1973. Immanuil Kant. Leningrad: Nauka.
Hegel, George 2019. Nauka logiki. Moscow: ACT.
Kant, Immanuel 1934. Prolegomeny. Moscow; Leningrad: Sotsekgiz (OGIZ, State Socio-Economic Publishing House).
Kant, Immanuel 1994. Kritika chistogo razuma. Moscow: Mysl.
Funding
The article was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant No. 19-18-00100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gasparyan, D. False contradiction: a critique of Immanuel Kant’s transcendental dialectic in the Kantian thought of Valentin Asmus. Stud East Eur Thought 75, 613–628 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09578-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09578-2