Notes
Hopkins can be criticized on several fronts. First, Husserl’s position in PA may not reduce symbolic numbers to authentic numbers so simply as he believes (Ierna, 2014: 255–259). Second, he disregards Husserl’s historical context, with its development of the concepts of set and manifold, the emergence of the paradoxes, the formalization of logic itself and the separation of semantics and syntax, which obscures Husserl’s distinction between formal abstraction to any-object-whatsoever and the formal ‘game-meaning’ of algorithmic technique (Hartimo, 2013). Third, he fails to distinguish Husserl’s project of recovering the evidential presuppositions of formal ontology from the problem of the constitution of formal mathematics as traditionally understood, the former being a matter of truth logic as a critique of tradition from the point of view of its implicit telos (Husserl, 1969: 203–205) and likely connected to constructivist concerns about the paradoxes. Fourth, he fails to see how the project of the Crisis involves a new horizon of problems that may bring into question aspects of the project of formal ontology.
The metaphysical dimension of the crisis is mentioned, but it is understood as a matter of metaphysics bestowing cultural meaning on the sciences rather than a problem that enters into the cognitive content of the sciences (p. 16). This assumes that the content of a science can somehow be cleanly separated from the ultimate metaphysical presuppositions of its conceptuality.
References
Bloch, E. (1970). A philosophy of the future (J. Cumming, Trans.). Herder and Herder.
Carr, D. (1974). Phenomenology and the problem of history: A study of Husserl’s transcendental philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
De Santis, D. (2020). The theoretical reformer: On Husserl’s Plato. The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 51(3), 231–246.
Gasteiger, T. (2021). Husserl and Tran Duc Thao: Crisis, renewal and the ontology of possibility. In G. Abdel-Shehid & S. Noori (Eds.), Partisan universalism: Essays in honour of Ato-Sekyi Otu (pp. 154–166). Daraja Press.
Gurwitsch, A. (1974). Perceptual coherence as the foundation of the judgment of predication. In Phenomenology and the theory of science (pp. 241–267). Northwestern University Press.
Hartimo, M. (2013). Burt C. Hopkins: The origin of the logic of symbolic mathematics. Edmund Husserl and Jakob Klein. Husserl Studies, 29(3), 239–249.
Heidegger, M. (2014). Introduction to metaphysics (G. Fried & R. Polt., Trans.). Yale University Press.
Hopkins, B. C. (2011). The origin of the logic of symbolic mathematics: Edmund Husserl and Jacob Klein. Indiana University Press.
Hopkins, B. C. (2016). Husserl and Jakob Klein. The European Legacy, 21(5–6), 535–555.
Hountondji, P. J. (2002). The struggle for meaning: Reflections on philosophy, culture and democracy in Africa (J. Conteh-Morgan, Trans.). Ohio University Center for International Studies.
Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and transcendental logic (D. Cairns, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
Husserl, E. (1973). Husserliana, Band XV: Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität, Dritter Teil (1925–1935). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, First Book (F. Kersten, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Husserl, E. (1997). Phenomenology and anthropology (T. Sheehan, & R.E. Palmer, Trans.). In Psychology and transcendental phenomenology and the confrontation with Heidegger (1927–1931) (pp. 485–500). Kluwer Academic Press.
Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations, volume 1 (J.N. Findlay, Trans.). Routledge.
Husserl, E. (2003). Philosophy of arithmetic (D. Willard, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ierna, C. (2014). Burt C. Hopkins: The origin of the logic of symbolic mathematics: Edmund Husserl and Jacob Klein. Philosophia Mathematica, 22(2), 249–278.
Kosik, K. (1976). Dialectics of the concrete (K. Kovanda & J. Schmidt, Trans.). D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One dimensional man. Beacon Press.
Marcuse, H. (1982). On science and phenomenology. In A. Arato & E. Gebhardt (Eds.), The essential Frankfurt School reader (pp. 466–476). Continuum.
Marcuse, H. (2005). On the philosophical foundations of the concept of labor in economics. In R. Wolin & J. Abromeit (Eds.), Heideggerian Marxism (pp. 122-150). University of Nebraska Press.
Marx, K. (1990). Capital, volume 1 (B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin.
Marx, K. (1991). Capital, volume 3 (D. Fernbach, Trans). Penguin.
Paci, E. (1972a). The function of the sciences and the meaning of man (P. Piccone, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
Paci, E. (1972b). The philosophy of the ego and the philosophy of relation (E.P. Mahoney and E. Caserta, Trans.). Philosophy Today, 16(3), 220–229.
Patočka, J. (2007). Ideology and life in the idea (E. Manton, Trans.). Studia Phænomenologica, 7, 89–96.
Rickert, H. (2018). Sämtliche Werke, Band 2: Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis, Teilband 2/1. De Gruyter.
Sekyi-Otu, A. (1996). Fanon’s dialectic of experience. Harvard University Press.
Thao, T. D. (1946). Sur l’Indochine. Les Temps Modernes, 5, 878–900.
Thao, T. D. (2009). The origins of the phenomenological reduction in Husserl (N. de Warren, Trans.). Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 30(2), 337–348.
Trizio, E. (2016). What is the crisis of Western science? Husserl Studies, 32(3), 191–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gasteiger, T. Ian H. Angus: Groundwork of Phenomenological Marxism: Crisis, Body, World. Hum Stud 45, 179–187 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09622-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09622-w