Abstract
Rationality and reasonableness can be illustrated as Janus-faced concepts, not only in a descriptive diagnosis but also in a normative construction of adjudication, and in the analysis of its practical and rhetorical effects. Considering such an illustration, the present reflection returns to the discussion on the relevance of rationality and reasonableness in legal interpretation, aiming at distinguishing and/or connecting principles and criteria, beyond formally logical and/or procedurally argumentative decision-making, and, thus, within a normatively practical adjudication. Such an approach will be presented in two main steps. In a first step, the rationality/reasonableness dichotomy will be discussed within a constitutive connection between principles and criteria in adjudication, and understanding legal principles as normatively substantial foundations to legal criteria—the former as axiological references filtered into the juridical system and the latter as their concretizations, and whose practical adequacy is rhetorically assigned by the interpretive communities involved in/by adjudication, and normatively referred both to their practical accordance to the axiological normativity of the principles they shall presuppose and to their suitability as practical operators to the problematic relevance of the sub judice cases. In a second step, and consequently, encompassing the projection of legal interpretation, in semiotic and in practical-normative perspectives, in order to discuss their constituting practical relevance in adjudication, the rationality/reasonableness dichotomy will be experimented within formal-logical procedures and within practical-dialectical connections between juridical problem and juridical system—therefore stating a discussion on the foundations, the intentionality and the consequences of adjudication, amongst (theoretical-formal) deduction and (practical-dialectical) analogy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarnio, A. 1987. The Rational as Reasonable. A Treatise on Legal Justification. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Alexy, R. 2009. The Reasonableness of Law. In Reasonableness and Law, ed. G. Bongiovanni, G. Sartor, and C. Valentini. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ashley, K.D. 2017. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bronze, F.J. 1993. Breves considerações sobre o estado actual da questão metodonomológica, Boletim da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, LXIX: 177-199; also in Analogias, Coimbra: Coimbra, Editora 2012.
Bronze, F.J. 1994. A metodonomologia entre a semelhança e a diferença (reflexão problematizante dos pólos da radical matriz analógica do discurso jurídico), STVDIA IVRIDICA 3, Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Bronze, F.J. 1998. O jurista: pessoa ou andróide? In AB UNO AD OMNES—75 anos da Coimbra Editora, Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Bronze, F.J. 2008. A metodonomologia (para além da argumentação). In org. J. Figueiredo Dias, J. J. Gomes Canotilho and J. Faria Costa, Ars Ivdicandi – Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor António Castanheira Neves, STVDIA IVRIDICA 90, Ad Honorem – 3, vol. I – Filosofia, Teoria e Metodologia, Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Bronze, F.J. 2009. Praxis, problema, nomos (um olhar oblíquo sobre a respectiva intersecção). In org. M. Costa Andrade/M. J. Antunes/S. Aires de Sousa, Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor Jorge de Figueiredo Dias, vol. IV, Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Bronze, F.J. 2011/2012. “Pj – Jd: A equação metodonomológica (as incógnitas que articula e o modo como se resolve)”, Boletim da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, LXXXVII, II: 87–134; LXXXVIII, I: 13–53; also in Analogias, Coimbra: Coimbra, Editora 2012.
Eco, U. 1990. The Limits of interpretation, trans. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press (I limiti dell’interpretazione. Milano: Bompiani, 1990).
Eco, U. 1992. Overinterpreting Texts. In Interpretation and Overinterpretation, ed. Stefan Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gaudêncio, A.M. 2012. From Centrifugal Teleology to Centripetal Axiology(?): (In)adequacy of the Movement of Law to the Velocity of Praxis. Boletim da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra LXXXVIII I: 91–103.
Neves, A.C. 1993. Metodologia Jurídica. Problemas Fundamentais, STVDIA IVRIDICA 1, Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Neves, A.C. 1995. O actual problema metodológico da realização do direito, in Digesta – Escritos acerca do Direito, do pensamento jurídico, da sua metodologia e outros, vol. II, Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Neves, A.C. 1995. Método jurídico. In Digesta – Escritos acerca do Direito, do pensamento jurídico, da sua metodologia e outros, II, Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Neves, A.C. 1995. Interpretação jurídica. In Digesta – Escritos acerca do Direito, do pensamento jurídico, da sua metodologia e outros, II, Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
Neves, A.C. 1999. O problema da autonomia do Direito no actual problema da juridicidade. In coord. J. A. Pinto Ribeiro, O Homem e o Tempo. Liber Amicorum para Miguel Baptista Pereira. Porto: Fundação Eng. António de Almeida.
Nöth, W. 1995. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Perelman, C. 1979. The Rational and the Reasonable. Philosophic Exchange 10(1): 29–34.
Saussure, F. 1971. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Susskind, R. 1996. The Future of Law: Facing the Challenges of Information Technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaudêncio, A.M.S. Rationality and/as Reasonableness Within Formal-Theoretical and Practical-Dialectical Approaches to Adjudication: Semiotic and Normative Perspectives. Int J Semiot Law 33, 1033–1041 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09755-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09755-0